UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF GENERATIVE AI AS A PARTICIPANT IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY AT A VIETNAMESE UNIVERSITY

Tan Tai Nguyen

Abstract


Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has entered university English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings at remarkable speed, yet how learners perceive it as a participant in classroom interaction, alongside their teachers and peers, remains underexplored, particularly in Vietnamese higher education. Adopting a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, this study surveyed 50 English-major undergraduates at a public university in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, with a bilingual instrument of 29 Likert items and two open-ended prompts, and then interviewed four focal students to interpret the survey patterns. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, non-parametric comparisons, a Spearman correlation, and qualitative content analysis were used to characterise students’ patterns of GenAI use and their construal of GenAI as an interactional partner. Students used GenAI most for explaining grammar and vocabulary, generating ideas, and obtaining writing feedback, and least for speaking practice. They construed it primarily as a preparatory tutor and peer that scaffolds what they will say around class, reporting heightened willingness to communicate; yet they did not trust its English over their teacher’s, ranking their trust as teacher over AI over peers. Frequency of use was moderately associated with perceiving GenAI as an interactional participant. Both strands converged on one tension: the preparatory function that supported interaction also constrained it when GenAI produced over-complex language or fostered dependency that slowed real-time turn-taking. The study offers early Vietnam-based evidence that learners position GenAI as a backstage rehearsal partner rather than a replacement interlocutor, and points to a pedagogical need for prompt literacy and register-appropriate editing.

Keywords


generative AI; ChatGPT; EFL; higher education; classroom interaction; student perceptions; Vietnam

Full Text:

PDF

References


Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Du, J., & Alm, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) students’ language learning experience: A self-determination theory analysis. Education Sciences, 14(7), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070726

Du, J., & Daniel, B. K. (2024). Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100230

Ho, A., & Nguyen, H. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in language learning: EFL students’ perceptions of technology acceptance. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/fr1rkj58

Huang, F., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Modelling generative AI acceptance, perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and self-efficacy to English as a foreign language learners’ willingness to communicate. European Journal of Education, 59(3), e12770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12770

Jeon, J. (2024). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners’ experiences and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241

Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students’ perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100279

Kucuk, T. (2024). ChatGPT-integrated grammar teaching and learning in EFL classes: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Arab World English Journal, (ChatGPT Special Issue), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/chatgpt.6

Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2025). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288

Liu, G. L., Zou, M. M., Soyoof, A., & Chiu, M. M. (2025). Untangling the relationship between AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE), foreign language enjoyment and willingness to communicate. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e12846. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12846

Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5

Ma, Y., & Chen, M. (2024). AI-empowered applications' effects on EFL learners’ engagement in the classroom and academic procrastination. BMC Psychology, 12, 682. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02248-w

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290

Muniandy, J., & Selvanathan, M. (2025). ChatGPT, a partnering tool to improve ESL learners’ speaking skills: Case study in a public university, Malaysia. Teaching Public Administration, 43(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394241230152

Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V., Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in academic writing in English as a foreign language. Education Sciences, 15(5), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611

Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Qu, K., & Wu, X. (2024). ChatGPT as a CALL tool in language education: A study of hedonic motivation adoption models in English learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19471–19503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12598-y

Rezai, A., Namaziandost, E., & Hwang, G.-J. (2024). How can ChatGPT open promising avenues for L2 development? A phenomenological study involving EFL university students. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100510

Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2

Teng, M. F. (2024). ‘ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies’: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive awareness and EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in utilising ChatGPT for writing feedback. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12811. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811

Toncelli, R., & Kostka, I. (2024). A love-hate relationship: Exploring faculty attitudes towards GenAI and its integration into teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240306

Ulla, M. B., Advincula, M. J. C., Mombay, C. D. S., Mercullo, H. M. A., et al. (2024). How can GenAI foster an inclusive language classroom? A critical language pedagogy perspective from Philippine higher education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100314

Van Horn, K. R. (2024). ChatGPT in English language learning: Exploring perceptions and promoting autonomy in a university EFL context. TESL-EJ, 28(1), a8. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a8

Wang, C., Zou, B., Du, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). The impact of different conversational generative AI chatbots on EFL learners: An analysis of willingness to communicate, foreign language enjoyment and speaking self-efficacy. System, 126, 103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103533

Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, & Rusdin, D. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity: EFL students’ experiences with ChatGPT in academic writing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2392388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388

Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212

Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., & Zakiya, R. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335

Zou, B., Wang, C., Yan, Y., Du, X., & Ji, Y. (2025). Exploring English as a foreign language learners’ adoption and utilisation of ChatGPT for speaking practice through the lens of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12658




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v11i4.7002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).