MODERNISING GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING AND PROTECTING PUBLIC FINANCIAL DATA IN SIERRA LEONE: A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
Abstract
Sierra Leone presents a paradox that should trouble anyone who studies public financial management reforms in low-income countries. Two decades of sustained investment, five independent Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessments and three successive reform strategies have produced genuine achievements: a Treasury Single Account (TSA), an upgraded Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) covering thirty ministries, departments and agencies, adoption of Cash Basis International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), an operational electronic procurement platform and an ‘A’ rating for budget classification in the 2021 to 2022 PEFA assessment. Yet, in December 2025 the Financial Secretary warned publicly that fragmented data systems were bleeding value from payroll and pension administration, observing that “somebody will still continue to benefit from one system while the other system is losing”. This article takes that warning as its organising diagnosis. It argues that Sierra Leone has reached the limits of system-by-system modernisation and that the next generation of reform must treat three agendas as a single problem: interoperability across government financial systems, cyber-security and data protection for the financial information those systems generate, and institutional accountability for how that information is used. The article traces the reform trajectory from the Integrated Public Financial Management Reform Project (2008 to 2013) through the current interoperability roadmap, evaluates the emerging Data Protection and Right to Access Information Act and its unified dual-mandate authority, and analyses the persistent gap between transactional automation and data governance. It then proposes an integrated digital governance framework built on four pillars, digital infrastructure and systems integration, legal and regulatory enablement, institutional capacity and human capital, and oversight with citizen engagement, resting on a cross-cutting foundation of security and data protection by design, with a sequenced sixty-month implementation roadmap ‘costed’ against realistic institutional capacity and the financing envelope available from the IMF Extended Credit Facility, World Bank and African Development Bank operations. Sierra Leone’s experiment in fusing access to information and data protection within one authority, and in wiring anti-corruption oversight directly into digital PFM systems, offers lessons of genuine comparative significance for the Global South.
JEL: M40, M41, M48, G00, H00
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, R. (2020). Security engineering: A guide to building dependable distributed systems (3rd ed.). Wiley. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119644682
Andrews, M. (2013). The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060974
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747482.001.0001
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Cangiano, M., Curristine, T., & Lazare, M. (Eds.). (2013). Public financial management and its emerging architecture. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475531091.071
COSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission). (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. COSO. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Enterprise_Risk_Management_Integrating_w.html?id=U28O0QEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dener, C., Watkins, J., & Dorotinsky, W. L. (2011). Financial management information systems: 25 years of World Bank experience on what works and what doesn’t (World Bank Study). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8750-4
Diamond, J., & Khemani, P. (2006). Introducing financial management information systems in developing countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(3), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v5-art17-en
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88.
Government of Ghana. (2012). Data Protection Act, 2012 (Act 843). Government Printer.
Government of Kenya. (2019). The Data Protection Act, No. 24 of 2019. Government Printer.
Government of Nigeria. (2023). Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023. Federal Government Printer.
Government of Sierra Leone. (2016). Public Financial Management Act, 2016. Government Printing Department.
Government of Sierra Leone. (2021). Cybersecurity and Crime Act, 2021. Government Printing Department.
Government of Sierra Leone. (2025). Communications of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Information and Civic Education on PFM interoperability, payroll and pension data fragmentation, and the Data Protection and Right to Access Information Bill [Official statements and workshop proceedings, July–December 2025; to be verified against gazetted texts and official releases].
Hashim, A. (2014). A handbook on financial management information systems for government: A practitioner’s guide for setting reform priorities, systems design, and implementation (Africa Operations Services Series). World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/147241467987856662
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
IFAC & CIPFA (International Federation of Accountants & Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy). (2021). International public sector financial accountability index: 2021 status report. IFAC. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/public-sector/publications/international-public-sector-financial-accountability-index-2021-status-report
International Monetary Fund. (2025a). Sierra Leone: Governance and corruption diagnostic assessment [Country report; details to be verified]. IMF. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/publications/technical-assistance-reports/issues/2025/12/10/sierra-leone-technical-assistance-report-governance-and-corruption-diagnostic-572467
International Monetary Fund. (2025b). IMF Executive Board completes the first and second reviews of the Extended Credit Facility arrangement with Sierra Leone [Press release, December 2025; to be verified]. IMF. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/12/16/pr-25425-sierra-leone-imf-completes-1st-and-2nd-reviews-arrangement-under-ecf
INTERPOL. (2024). African cyberthreat assessment report. INTERPOL. Retrieved from https://afripol.africa-union.org/resources/interpol-african-cyberthreat-assessment-report-2024
IPSASB (International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board). (2017). Financial reporting under the cash basis of accounting (revised). IFAC.
IPSASB (International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board). (2022). Handbook of international public sector accounting pronouncements. IFAC.
ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2021). Global Cybersecurity Index 2020. ITU. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/epublications/ru/publication/d-str-gci.01-2021-htm-e
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 (NIST CSWP 29). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2023). 2023 OECD Digital Government Index (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers). OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
PEFA Secretariat. (2023). Sierra Leone: Public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) performance assessment report, 2021–2022 [Report details to be verified]. PEFA Secretariat. Retrieved from https://www.pefa.org/node/5185
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35
Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.123
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
United Nations. (2024). United Nations e-government survey 2024. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2024
World Bank. (2022). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/298661631773566870
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v10i5.2295
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Momoh Conteh, Musa Abdullah Kargbo, Abdul Rahman N’Jai, Mohamed Sahid Sesay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2026. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research (ISSN 2501-9430) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
