Eser Ordem, Erdogan Bada


The dominance of syntactic studies in linguistics has caused lexis and grammar to be perceived as two distinct categories. With introduction of the paradigm of cognitive linguistics, the studies in syntax have been replaced by those in lexis and concepts. Semantics has come to the fore through the studies in cognitive linguistics, and there has been a trend from syntactic studies to lexical ones. In addition to research in cognitive linguistics, construction grammar has also emphasized the continuum between lexis and grammar. With the emergence of corpus linguistics, the studies regarding the continuum between lexis and grammar have gained momentum, and thus studies of collocations have been theorized. Early studies of collocations have focused on only lexis and disregarded grammar. However, in the process, the studies have also incorporated grammar as well, and this view supports the idea that each word has its own grammatical properties. Therefore, lexis and grammar should be studied on the same continuum because there is a continuum between these two categories rather than a discontinuum. Within the framework of this paradigm, this study focused on verb+noun lexical collocations across the health, physical and social sciences in the written academic genre and analyzed these lexical collocations through the frequency and chi-square analysis. The study aimed to search for commonalities and differences between the verbs with their collocations. The results showed that there were more similarities and relationship between the health and physical sciences, while the social sciences indicated a significant difference compared to the other two. The study found 165 common verbs used across the three sciences. 12 verbs among the 165 verbs were found to be candidate’s verb+noun lexical collocations as prototypes. 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Corpus linguistics, collocations, construction, prototype, written academic genre

Full Text:

PDF Academia.edu E R I C


Bartsch, S. (2004). Structural and functional properties of collocations in English. A corpus study of lexical and pragmatic constraints on lexical co-occurrence. Tübingen: Verlag Gunter Narr.

Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.

Bolinger, D. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum I, 1-14.

Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistics perspectives. London: Routledge.

De. Saussure, F. (1916). Nature of the linguistics sign. In C. Bally & A. Sechehaye (Eds.), Cours de linguistique générale, McGraw Hill Education.

Evert, S. (2007). Corpora and collocations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fillmore, C., J. (1979). On fluency. In C. Fillmore, J. D. Kempler & S.Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behaviour (pp.85-101). New York: Academic Press.

Fillmore, C. (1992). Corpus linguistics or computer-aided armchair linguistics. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistic, Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991 . ACM, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Firth, J. (1951). Modes of meaning. Papers in Linguistics, 5, 190–215. Firth, J. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Firth, J. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Golberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gries, S.Th. (2011). Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What's the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In M. Brdar, M. Žic Fuchs, & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: convergence and expansion, (pp. 237-256). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Gries, S.Th. (2013). Data in construction grammar. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.93-108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gries, S.Th. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97-129.

Gries, S.Th. (2012). Collostructions. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp.92-95). London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Hausmann F. J. (1989). “Le dictionnaire de collocations”. In F.J. Hausmann, O Reichmann, H.E.Wiegand., L. Zgusta (Eds.), Wörterbücher : Ein internationales Handbuch zur Lexicographie, Dictionaries, Dictionnaires (pp.1010-1019). Berlin/New-York, De Gruyter.

Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction. London, Routledge.

Hoey, M. (2004). Lexical priming and the properties of text. In A. Partington, J. Morley, L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (pp. 385–412). Bern: Peter Lang.

Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24 – 44.

Hunston, S. & Gill F. (2000). Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin, & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99- 121). London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16 (3), 148-164.

Hyland, K. (2008). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41 (4), 543-562.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), 123-139.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary? TESOL Quarterly, 41 (2), 235-254.

Hymes, D. H. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. The Hague: Mouton.

Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.) Directions in Corpus Linguistic, Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, (pp.4-8). ACM, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lewis, M. (1998). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Scott, M. (2010). Word Smith tools version 5.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75-106.

Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.

Sinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and text: Basic principles. In M.Wynne (Ed.), Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to practice (pp.1-16). Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12, 365-382.

Watt, R.J.C. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.concordancesoftware.co.uk/index.html on 17th June, 2012.

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.87


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Eser Ordem, Erdogan Bada

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).