EXPLORING PROVISION FOR GIFTED STUDENTS IN CHINA: A NARRATIVE CASE STUDY OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS' PRACTICES

Joseph Xhuxhi

Abstract


This qualitative case study aims to explore how three Chinese primary school teachers understand, identify and provide for gifted students in ordinary classroom contexts. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with teachers from rural Shandong, an urban public school in Northeast China and an urban school context in Shanghai, the article examines gifted provision as a situated practice shaped by classroom routines, assessment pressure, family resources, school culture and teacher agency. The study uses thematic analysis to compare teachers' accounts of giftedness, identification, differentiation, institutional support and constraints. The findings show that teachers recognize high potential through everyday signs such as rapid comprehension, accurate responses, independence, advanced preparation, wide reading, curiosity, knowledge transfer and subject-specific engagement. However, public recognition of giftedness remains narrowed by examination performance, ranking and visible classroom achievement. Differentiated instruction is valued in principle but is usually enacted informally through questioning, peer sharing, occasional extension, role assignment, after-class suggestions and teacher encouragement rather than through systematic curriculum adaptation. Across the three cases, teachers' professional agency is bound by common pacing, large or mixed-ability classes, workload, safety responsibilities, parental expectations, monitoring, limited training and weak policy guidance. The article argues that the absence of school-based gifted provision is not neutral, because it shifts enrichment opportunities onto families and therefore reproduces uneven access. Building on a comparison with previous case-study work in Madrid, the article recommends a modest, inclusive and sustainable model of gifted support that frames challenge as educational fairness rather than elitism.

Keywords


gifted education; differentiated instruction; Chinese primary education; teacher agency and equity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, M., & Porta, T. (2025). Primary teachers' perceptions of differentiated instruction: Insights from Maldivian classrooms. Education 3-13. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2025.2473412

Ardenlid, F., Lundqvist, J., & Sund, L. (2025). A scoping review and thematic analysis of differentiated instruction practices: How teachers foster inclusive classrooms for all students, including gifted students. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100439

Bi, M., Struyven, K., & Zhu, C. (2023). Variables that influence teachers' practice of differentiated instruction in Chinese classrooms: A study from teachers' perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124259

Bi, M., Struyven, K., & Zhu, C. (2024a). Differentiated instruction in Chinese primary and secondary schools: A systematic literature review. ECNU Review of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265126

Bi, M., Struyven, K., Zhu, C., & Zhong, C. (2024b). From perception to practice: How Chinese teachers perceive and implement differentiated instruction in primary and secondary schools. Education 3-13. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2344853

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Thematic_Analysis.html?id=mToqEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Brighton, C. M., Moon, T. R., Jarvis, J. M., & Hockett, J. A. (2007). Primary grade teachers' conceptions of giftedness and talent: A case-based investigation (RM07232). National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505387.pdf

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391-1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Cai, F. (2025). Teachers' perceptions of young gifted children in China. Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(1), 37-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241287851

Chu, H. (2012). 追求卓越：英才教育与国家发展——突破我国英才教育的认识误区与政策障碍 [Striving for excellence: Gifted education and national development--To break through misunderstandings and policy obstacles of gifted education in China]. 教育研究 [Educational Research], 2012(11), 28-35.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Inquiry_and_Research_Design.html?id=pwjMEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Dahal, N., Neupane, B. P., Pant, B. P., Dhakal, R. K., Giri, D. R., Ghimire, P. R., & Bhandari, L. P. (2024). Participant selection procedures in qualitative research: Experiences and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, Article 1512747. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1512747

Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020

Dai, D. Y., Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Yang, Y. (2016). Gifted education in mainland China. In D. Y. Dai & C. C. Kuo (Eds.), Gifted education in Asia: Problems and prospects (pp. 79-110). Information Age Publishing.

Dal Forno, L. F., Bahia, S., & Veiga, F. H. (2015). Gifted amongst preschool children: An analysis on how teachers recognize giftedness. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 5(1), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2015.0090

Deterding, N. M., & Waters, M. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377

Deunk, M. I., Doolaard, S., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., & Bosker, R. J. (2015). Differentiation within and across classrooms: A systematic review of studies into the cognitive effects of differentiation practices. GION Education/Research. Retrieved from https://www.nko.nl/sites/nro/files/migrate/Differentiation-within-and-across-classrooms-Review.pdf

Fu, T. (2017). Wandering in the shadow of egalitarianism and equity: A social and cultural explanation to the underdeveloped gifted education in China. Global Education Review, 4(1), 34-44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137996.pdf

Gagné, F. (2000). A differentiated model of giftedness and talent (DMGT): Year 2000 update. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448544.pdf

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books. Retrieved from https://dspace.sxcjpr.edu.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/720/1/Howard%20Gardner%20-%20Frames%20of%20Mind_%20The%20Theory%20of%20Multiple%20Intelligences-Basic%20Books%20%282011%29%20%281%29.pdf

Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2022). Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers' philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students' interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1383-1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739

Gibbs, K. (2023). Voices in practice: Challenges to implementing differentiated instruction by teachers and school leaders in an Australian mainstream secondary school. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50(4), 1217-1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00551-2

Gibbs, K., & McKay, L. (2021). Differentiated teaching practices of Australian mainstream classroom teachers: A systematic review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101799

Kaplan, S. N. (2022). Factors affecting the perceptions and practices of differentiated curricula and pedagogies for gifted and talented students. Education Sciences, 12(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010041

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/InterViews.html?id=bZGvwsP1BRwC&redir_esc=y

Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464

Letzel, V., Pozas, M., & Schneider, C. (2023). Challenging but positive! An exploration into teacher attitude profiles towards differentiated instruction in Germany. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12535

Lv, S., He, Y., Xiong, B., & Wu, Y. (2024). Stress in Chinese teachers who teach the mathematically gifted: A qualitative perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388236

Margrain, V., & Farquhar, S. (2012). The education of gifted children in the early years: A first survey of views, teaching practices, resourcing and administration issues. Apex, 17(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21307/apex-2012-005

Miller, E. M. (2009). The effect of training in gifted education on elementary classroom teachers' theory-based reasoning about the concept of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 65-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903300104

Opoku, M. P., Elhoweris, H., Anwahi, N., Alsheikh, N., Mustafa, A., & Al Dhaheri, W. (2025). Differentiated instruction for gifted teaching behaviour in classrooms: What are the levers of change in the United Arab Emirates? Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(1), 6-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241247593

Plucker, J. A., McWilliams, J., & Guo, J. (2021). Smart contexts for 21st century talent development. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 295-316). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_17

Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20299281

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Narrative_Methods_for_the_Human_Sciences.html?id=DfAgxwF0GnQC&redir_esc=y

Shi, J., & Li, P. (2018). New century gifted education in mainland China. In B. Wallace, D. A. Sisk, & J. Senior (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented education (pp. 446-461). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463074.n37

Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/How_to_Differentiate_Instruction_in_Acad.html?id=rIl2DgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Mind_in_Society.html?id=RxjjUefze_oC&redir_esc=y

Xhuxhi, J. (2025). A case study of provision for gifted students in STEM subjects of a bilingual private secondary school in Madrid. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(4), 1666-1693. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i4.3068

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books/about/Case_Study_Research_and_Applications.html?hl=it&id=6DwmDwAAQBAJ

Yuen, S. Y., Luo, Z., & Wan, S. W.-Y. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of implementing differentiated instruction amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a qualitative exploration. Education Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100989




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i8.6834

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Xhuxhi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).