PASTORAL LIFE IN RURAL MONGOLIA: HERDERS’ EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND FUTURE ADAPTATIONS

Aruhan Bai, Javzandulam Batsaikhan

Abstract


Pastoralism remains central to Mongolia’s cultural heritage and rural economy, yet herders face mounting pressures from environmental change, demographic shifts, and market instability. This qualitative study explores the lived experiences, challenges, and future perspectives of four herders in western Mongolia, representing different generations and family structures. Data were collected through participant observation and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings reveal that herders value pastoral life for its harmony with nature, emotional fulfillment from livestock, self-sufficiency, and cultural continuity. However, they also confront profound challenges, including climate variability, labor shortages, educational disruptions, health care inaccessibility, and inadequate government support. Participants voiced concern about the declining number of herders and emphasized that sustaining pastoralism will depend on adaptive strategies, intergenerational knowledge transfer, and responsive state policies. The study contributes to understanding how cultural identity, environmental change, and socioeconomic factors intersect in shaping the future of Mongolian pastoralism.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


pastoral life, herder, rural Mongolia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addison, J., Brown, C., Davies, J., Holcombe, S., & Walters, G. (2013). A critical review of rangeland management in Mongolia. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-3-8

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Begzsuren, S., Ellis, J. E., Ojima, D. S., Coughenour, M. B., & Chuluun, T. (2004). Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park, Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.02.001

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (1999). Sustaining the steppes: A geographical history of pastoral land use in Mongolia. The Geographical Review, 89(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/216154

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., & Batbuyan, B. (2004). Law and disorder: Local implementation of Mongolia’s land law. Development and Change, 35(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00345.x

Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205

Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/research-ethics-for-social-scientists/toc#_

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for semi-structured interview guides. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kreutzmann, H. (2012). Pastoral practices and their transformation in the Karakoram. In H. Kreutzmann (Ed.), Pastoral practices in High Asia (pp. 1–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.3167/082279404780446096

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/naturalistic-inquiry

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED415771

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Research.html?id=JFN_BwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=p0wXBAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Miyamae, N. (2003). モンゴルにおける初等教育の諸問題と教育協力の課題 [Issues of primary education and educational cooperation in Mongolia]. Kyushu Kyoiku Gakkai Kenkyu Kiyo, 31, 105–112.

O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2392270

Sternberg, T. (2008). Environmental challenges in Mongolia’s dryland pastoral landscape. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(7), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.12.016

Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

UNESCO. (2019). Nomadic pastoralism in Mongolia: Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing.

Upton, C. (2010). Living off the land: Nature and nomadism in Mongolia. Geoforum, 41(5), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.06.004

Upton, C. (2012). Managing Mongolia’s commons: Land reforms, social context, and institutional change. Society & Natural Resources, 25(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.565454

Yembuu, B. (2016). Mongolian nomads: Effects of globalization and social change. In K. Ueno, S. Sonoda, & A. Nishimura (Eds.), Everyday knowledge, education and sustainable futures: Transdisciplinary approaches in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 89–105). Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0216-8_7

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i12.6370

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aruhan Bai, Javzandulam Batsaikhan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).