DESIGNING A NEEDS-BASED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR GERMAN LANGUAGE TEACHERS: EVIDENCE FROM GREECE
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anagnou E, Fragkoulis I, 2014. The contribution of mentoring and action research to teachers’ professional development in the context of informal learning. Review of European Studies 6(1): 133–142. doi: 10.5539/res.v6n1p133
Avalos B, 2011. Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education 27(1): 10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Bi M, Struyven K, Zhu C, 2024. Differentiated instruction in Chinese primary and secondary schools: A systematic literature review. ECNU Review of Education 7(2): 1–25. doi: 10.1177/20965311241265126
Bragg LA, Walsh C, Heyeres M, 2021. Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education 166: 104158. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
Brandão A, Pedro L, Zagalo N, 2024. Teacher professional development for a future with generative artificial intelligence: An integrative literature review. Digital Education Review 45: 151–157. doi: 10.1344/der.2024.45.151-157
Casal Otero L, Catala A, Fernández Morante C, González Abril L, 2023. AI literacy in K–12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education 10: Article 29. doi: 10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
Centre for the Greek Language (CGL), 2022. Routes in teaching Greek as a second/foreign language: Online training program for teachers. Thessaloniki, Greece: Centre for the Greek Language. https://greeklanguage.gr/en/ Accessed 3 July 2025
Cohen L, Manion L, 1994. Methodology of educational research (Greek trans. Ch. Mitsopoulou & M. Filopoulou), Athens, Greece: Ekfrasi
Collie RJ, 2023. Teacher well-being and turnover intentions: Investigating the roles of job resources and job demands. British Journal of Educational Psychology 93(3): 712–726. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12587
Creswell JW, 2011. Research in education: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Greek trans. N. Kouvarakou; ed. Ch. Tzorbatzoudis), Athens, Greece: Ion
Darling-Hammond L, Hyler ME, Gardner M, 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. doi: 10.54300/122.311
Duan S, Bissaker K, Xu Z, 2024. Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 36: 43. doi: 10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2
Fukaya T, Nakamura D, Kitayama Y, Nakagoshi T, 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies on mathematics and science pedagogical content knowledge. Frontiers in Education 9: Article 1435758. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1435758
Futterer T, Richter E, Richter D, 2024. Teachers’ engagement in online professional development—The interplay of online PD quality and teacher motivation. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 27: 739–768. doi: 10.1007/s11618-024-01241-8
Fylan F, 2005. Semi structured interviewing. In Miles J, Gilbert P (Eds.), A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, pp 65–78
Galletta A, 2013. Mastering the Semi Structured Interview and Beyond, New York, USA: University Press
Garton S, Richards K, 2016. Professional encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching. Palgrave Macmillan
Guskey TR, 2002. Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8(3): 381–391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
Hanft BE, Rush DD, Shelden ML, 2004. Coaching families and colleagues in early childhood. Baltimore, USA: Brookes Publishing
Institute of Educational Policy (IEP), 2022. Distance teacher training programs. Athens, Greece: Institute of Educational Policy. https://www.iep.edu.gr/en/ Accessed 3 April 2025
Hogan JA, Montalbano C, Coviello J, McQueston J, Kirby M, Koo BJ, Nissley-Tsiopinis J, Jutcovich S, Lang J, 2025. Developing Inclusive Educators: Analyzing the Effectiveness of a Short-Term Technical Assistance Model for Best Practices. Education Sciences 15(5): 578. doi: 10.3390/educsci15050578
Kemmis S, McTaggart R, Nixon R, 2014. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research, New York City, USA, Springer
Kennedy A, 2014. Models of Continuing Professional Development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education 40(3): 336–351. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
Korthagen FAJ, 2017. Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching 23(4): 387–405. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
Krippendorff K, 1989. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA: Sage Publications
Mason J, 2003. Qualitative Researching (Greek trans. E. Dimitriadou; ed. N. Kyriazi). Ellinika Grammata
Mercer S, 2023. The wellbeing of language teachers in the private sector: An ecological perspective. Educational Review. doi: 10.1177/1362168820973510
Mihulka K, Adamczak-Krysztofowicz S, 2023. In-service training of foreign language teachers in Poland: Aims and objectives versus implementation. Roczniki Humanistyczne 71(10): 197–212. doi: 10.18290/rh237110.13
Ministry of Education, 2022. Ministerial Decision 102919/GD4: Definition of Pedagogical Counselor Mentor (Government Gazette B 4509)
Mulaimović N, Richter E, Lazarides R, Richter D, 2025. Comparing quality and engagement in face‐to‐face and online teacher professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology 56(1): 61–79. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13480
Nguyen PV, 2023. Collaborative peer observation of teaching: enhancing academics’ collegiality and collaboration. Reflective Practice 24(4): 524–542. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2023.2210076
OECD, 2024. Education Policy Outlook 2024: Reshaping teaching into a thriving profession from ABCs to AI, Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/dd5140e4-en
Olawumi KB, Mavuso MP, 2024. In-service teacher training programmes that promote education for sustainable development: A review of emerging literature. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research 6: 1–20. doi: 10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.35
Richards JC, Farrell TSC, 2012. Practice teaching: A reflective approach, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Richter E, Richter D, 2024. Measuring the quality of teacher professional development: A large-scale validation study of an 18-item instrument for daily use. Studies in Educational Evaluation 81: 101357. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101357
Robson C, 2010. Real World Research (2nd ed.; Greek trans. V. P. Dalakou & K. Vasilikou), Athens, Greece: Gutenberg
Sachs J, 2016. Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching 22(4): 413–425. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
Schachter RE, 2015. An Analytic Study of the Professional Development Research in Early Childhood Education. Early Education and Development 26(8): 1057–1085. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2015.1009335
Scott A, Gath ME, Gillon G, McNeill B, Ghosh D, 2024. Facilitators of success for teacher professional development in literacy teaching using a micro credential model. Education Sciences 14(6): 578. doi: 10.3390/educsci14060578
Sheridan SM, Edwards CP, Marvin CA, Knoche LL, 2009. Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development 20(3): 377–401. doi: 10.1080/10409280802582795
Sims S, Fletcher-Wood H, 2021. Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 32(1): 47–63. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
Snyder P, Hemmeter ML, Meeker KA, Kinder K, Pasia C, McLaughlin T, 2012. Characterizing key features of the early childhood professional development literature. Infants & Young Children 25(3): 188–212. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0b013e31825a1ebf
Stavermann K, 2024. Online teacher professional development: A research synthesis on effectiveness and evaluation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 30: 203–240. doi: 10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9
Swaffield S, 2008. Critical friendship, dialogue and learning, in the context of Leadership for Learning. School Leadership & Management 28(4): 323–336. doi: 10.1080/13632430802292191
Unal Z, Unal A, 2023. Teacher Autonomy and Preferences in Professional Development: A Comprehensive Survey of Florida Educators. Innovare Journal of Education 11(6): 1–10. doi: 10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i6.49682
Uhlig U, 2023. A field experiment on the effects of weekly planning behaviour on work engagement, unfinished tasks, rumination, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 96(3): 575–598. doi: 10.1111/joop.12430
UNESCO, 2024. AI competency frameworks for students and teachers: Guidance for policymakers, Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i10.6195
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Anagnou Evaggelos, Iosif Fragkoulis, Maria-Anna Manana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).