REVISITING THE PHILIPPINE BS PHARMACY CURRICULUM AFTER 13 YEARS: A SURVEY ON PHARMACIST PRACTITIONERS FOR THE UPCOMING CURRICULUM REVISION

Romeo C. Ongpoy, Jr., Penuel P. David, Nora B. Capistrano, Jennifer Obliosca-Ongpoy, Frederick M. Francisco

Abstract


The objective of this study is to supposedly investigate the current 4-year BS Pharmacy curriculum in the Philippines in relation to the eventual shift to a 5-year BS Pharmacy curriculum by 2018 which did not materialize including modifications in the curricular topics and internship strategies. To do this, a cross-sectional study was done using purposive sampling answered by 119 practicing Filipino Pharmacists from the different areas of practice and regions in the Philippines. About this study, 72.88% prevalence rate of those who agree and strongly agree of the BS Pharmacy curriculum shift to a 5-year program was evident. There is also a strong percentage (highest subject is 98.6% and lowest subject is 59.3%) calling for improvement on all curricular topics. On the other hand, 63.3% of the respondents agree that increasing specialty rotations during internship would be more appropriate internship strategy but the new curriculum increases the internship hours instead that only gathers 4.6% support, the lowest among the options. It can be concluded, that it is only appropriate to shift to the 5-year BS Pharmacy program based on the perception of the respondents and improvement of all curricular topics must come with it.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


bachelor of pharmacy; curriculum; curriculum assessment; Philippines; curriculum research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Commission on Higher Education, CHED 2016-03: Guidelines on Graduate Education Scholarships for Faculty and Staff in the K to 12 Transition Period. 2016

Commission on Higher Education, CHED 2017-54: Policies, Standards and Guidelines for the Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy Program. 2017.

Noble, Christy, O’Brien, Mia, Coombes, Ian, Shaw, Nicholas and Nissen, Lisa. Concept Mapping to Evaluate an Undergraduate Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011; 75 (3) 55.

Hirsch, Jan, Do, Ai Hang, Hollenbach, Kathryn, Monoguerra, Anthony and Adler, David. Student’s Health-Related Quality of Life Across the Preclinical Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2009; 73 (8) 147.

Janke, Kristin, Traynor, Andrew and Sorensen, Todd. Refinement of Strengths Instruction in a Pharmacy Curriculum Over Eight Years. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011; 75 (30) 45.

El-Awady, El-Sayed, Moss, Stephen, Mottram, David and O, Donnell, James. Student Perspectives on Pharmacy Curriculum and Instruction in Egyptian Schools. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2006; 70 (1) 09.

Faruk Khan, Mo, Deimling, Michael and Philip, Ashok. Medicinal Chemistry and the Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011; 75 (8) 161.

Graber, David, Bellack, Janis, Lancaster, Carol and Musham, Catherine. Curriculum Topics in Pharmacy Education: Current and Ideal Emphasis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1999; 63: 145-151.

Tiralongo, Evelin and Wallis, Marianne. Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine Education Into the Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2008; 72 (4) 74.

Britton, Mark, Letassy, Nancy, Medina, Melissa and Er, Nelson. Evaluation, Assessment and Outcomes in Pharmacy Education: The 2007 AACP Institute. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2008; 72 (5) 99.

Awaisu, Ahmed, Mohamed, Mohamad Haniki Nik, Al-Efan, Qais Ahmad Mohammad. Perception of Pharmacy Students in Malaysia on the use of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations to Evaluate Competence. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2007; 71 (6) 118.

Kao, Doris, Hudmon, Karen Suchanek and Corelli, Robin. Evaluation of a Required Senior Research Project in a Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011; 75 (1) 5.

Hubball, Harry and Burt, Helen. Learning Outcomes and Program-Level Evaluation in a Four-Year Undergraduate Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2007; 71 (5) 90.

Draugalis, JoLaine Reierson, Slack, Marion, Sauer, Karen Ann, Haber, Stacy and Vaillancourt, Richard. Creation and Implementation of a Learning Outcomes Document for a Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2002; 66: 253-260.

Kelsch, Michael and Werremeyer, Amy. Poster Project to Emphasize Public Health in the Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2011; 75 (1) 2.

Tofade, Toyin, Khandoobhai, Anand and Leadon, Kim. Use of SMART Learning Objectives to Introduce Continuing Professional Development into the Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2012: 76 (4) 68.

Department of Health. Hospital Pharmacy Management Manual, 2nd edition (DOH, Philippines: 1994).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Romeo C. Ongpoy, Jr., Penuel P. David, Nora B. Capistrano, Jennifer Obliosca-Ongpoy, Frederick M. Francisco

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).