Taiye Umar Hassanna


This study investigated the extent of use of two levels of creativity in teaching Literature-in-English in tertiary institutions in Kwara State. The study employed the descriptive survey research design. Total enumeration sampling technique was used to select 32 lecturers of Literature-in-English from two public colleges and two faculties of education in the state. Two instruments were used to gather information for the study namely: Use of Creativity Questionnaire for Lecturers (UCQL), and Use of Creativity Observation Rating Scale (UCORS). Data collected were analysed using frequency, percentage, and mean. The results revealed that there was a low level of use of the two levels of creativity in teaching Literature-in-English with percentage ranging from 56.25% to 68.75% of respondents who did not use either of the levels of creativity at all, with their mean scores being less than 1. Lecturers also made use of teaching creatively (0.90) more than teaching for creativity (0.80). The study concluded that there was low use of the two levels of creativity in teaching Literature-in-English in tertiary educational institutions in Kwara State.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



teaching creatively; teaching for creativity

Full Text:



Agharuwhe, T. (2013). Parental Involvement, Interest in Schooling and School Environment as Predictors of Academic Self-efficacy among Fresh Secondary School Student in Oyo State, Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5-3 (1). 163-180.

Ambrose, D. (2005). Creativity in Teaching: Essential Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions in J. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across Domains. pp. 281- 298 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Bramwell–Rejskind, K. (2004). Bringing Creativity Back into Primary Education. Education 3(13), 105-107.

Clandfield, L. (2001). Teaching Literatures to English Language Learners. Ezine articles Retrieved September 8, 2012, from'?literature.html

Cropley, A. J. (1999) More Ways than One: Fostering Creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, Culture and Person: A Systems View of Creativity’ In Robert Sternberg (Ed). The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. New York. Cambridge University Press

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York. Harper Collins.

Halliwell, S. (1993). Teacher creativity and teacher education. In D. Bridges, & T. Kerry (Eds.), Developing Teachers Professionally pp. 67-78. New York: Routledge.

Joubert, M. (2001). The Art of Creative Teaching: NACCCE and beyond, in Craft, A., Jeffrey, B. and Liebling, M. (eds) Creativity in Education, London: Continuum.

Moss J. F. (2000), Teaching Literature in the Middle Grades: A Thematic approach. Norwood: Christopher Gordon publishers. New York: Teachers College Press.

National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999) All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education, London: Department for Education and Employment.

National Centre for Education statistics (2001) Digest of Education Statistics 2001. Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 2002–130

Nwodo, E. C. (2011). Deprivation of Literature-in-English as the Missing Link in Nigerian Education in the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Prospects. Journal of the Nigeria English Studies Association (JNESA) 14(2). 89-102.

Labo-Popoola, S. O. (2010).The Place of Literature in the Teaching of English Language as a Second Language. The Social Sciences, 5 (1), 49-54.

Ogunnaike, J. (2002). Challenges of the Teaching and Learning of Literature in Nigerian Secondary Schools. In A. Lawal, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on applied linguistics in language and literature (pp. 334-344). ISBN 978-032-041-5

Onukaogu, C. E. (2002). A Literature-Based English language Curriculum in Nigerian Schools and Colleges: In A. Lawal, et al. (Eds). Some Reflections on Minimum Requirements in Perspectives on Applied Linguistics in Language and Literature. ISBN 978-032-041-5

Rejskind, F. G. (2000). TAG Teachers: Only the Creative Need Apply. Roeper Review, 22, 153-157.

Richards, J. C. (2006) Communicative Language Teaching Today, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sawyer, S. (2004) Thinking Creatively. Primary Geographer, 50, 4-6.

Woods, P. (1995) Teachable moments: The art of creative teaching in primary schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Taiye Umar Hassanna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).