THE DEVELOPMENT OF COLLABORATION COMMUNICATION SKILLS AND METACOGNITIVE OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
Abstract
This study tries to achieve two major purposes, the development and experiment. The development within this study aims at developing learning instrument. In addition, this study also aims at discovering the influence of learning instrument developed on the students’ communication skill, discovering the collaboration skill of students, revealing the effect of learning instrument on the metacognition ability of students, revealing the effect of learning instrument on the Fabrication conceptual understanding of students. This study employed Four D Model and the experiment design was used quasi-experiment with non-equivalent control group design. The data analysis data of this study employed descriptive analysis and covariant analysis or Anakova. The findings of this study reveal that the learning instrument developed based on scientific approach is effective to enhance the communication skill, collaboration skill, metacognition ability, and fabrication conceptual understanding of the Mechanical Engineering Vocational Program Students of UNESA Surabaya. Considering that communication skill, collaboration skill, metacognition ability are imperative in recent days, therefore it is suggested to utilize this learning instrument during Fabrication Practice Learning as well as evaluating the instrument to generate an improved instrument.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Andrew. V.A., 2012. Using Learning Study to Improve the Teaching and Learning of Accounting in School in Brinai Darussalam. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. I (1); 23-40
Akker, Jan van den. et al., 1999. Design Approach and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Baedhowi, 2011. Dirjen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan RI (PMPTK)
Burhanuddin Afid . Konsep Dasar Pembelajaran Inovatif. Diunduh dari https:// afidburhanuddin.wordpress.com/category/manajemen-pendidikan/ pada diakses tgl 4 Maret 2015
Borthwick, A. 1995. Body of evidence, Vocational Education Journal, 70 (3), 24-26, 48.
Bragg, D.D. 1995. Assessing postsecondary vocational-technical outcomes: What are the alternatives? Journal of Vocational Education Research, 20 (4),15-39
Brigham, Frederick J Gustashaw, William E, III; Michele St Peter 2004. Scientific Practice and the Tradition of Advocacy in Special Education. Brigham. Journal of Learning Disabilities 37.3 (May/Jun 2004): 200-6.
Chappell, C. (2003). Changing pedagogy: Contemporary vocational learning. OVAL Research Working Paper 03-12. The Australian Centre for Organisational, Journal Pendidikan Vokasi, Vol 2, Nomor 1, Februari 2012 Vocational, and Adult Learning (OVAL), University of Technology, Sydney.
Cristian Y. Lumena, dkk 2012. Analisis Jalur Faktor-faktor Penyebab kriminalitas di Yogyakarta, 2002.
Cheng Chang, 2009. Self-Effect of Weytem For Various Student Motivation Levels. Journal Computing Research. 41(4):391-405.
Dharma, Surya, dkk, 2002. Paradigma Baru: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Amara Books,
Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA, Dirjen Mandikdasmen,
Depdiknas. 2013. Konsep Pendekatan Saintifik. Materi Ajar yang disampaikan dalam Rangka Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
Depdiknas._______. 2008. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 2 tahun 2008 Tentang Buku. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Furqon Hidayatullah (2013). Metro News.Com Surakarta, Minggu 19 Oktober 2013.
Frizal, 4 Agustus 2014. Kemampuan Menilai Siswa Paling Jeblok. Hasil Pelatihan. Jawa Pos edisi.
Gaspersz. 2007. Team Oriented Problem Solving. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Gay, L.R. 1991. Educational Evaluation and Measurement: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Second edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Goffree, Fred dan Maarten Dolk. 1995. Freudenthal Institute. Ultrecht: Universiteit Ultrecht.Neiveen, Nienken. 1999. Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Dalam Yan van den Akker, Robert
Gredler, M.E., 2011, Learning and Instruction: Teori dan Aplikasi, Kencana, Jakarta
Happyanto, Rixky. 2012. Pembelajaran inovatif diunduh dari http://pembe-lajaraninovatif.wordpress.com/page/2/ pada tanggal 12 desember 2013
Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. J. 2012. Multi-level assessment for discourse, understanding, and achievement in innovative learning contexts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, (4) 1-65.
Hill, Susan & Hill, Tim. 1993. The Collaborative Classroom: guide co-operative learning. Australia. Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
Hudoyo, H. 1988. Mengajar Belajar Matematika. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas
Ibrohim. 2013. Panduan pelaksanaan Lesson Study. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.
I Wayan Santyasa. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pengembangan & Teori Pengembangan Modul. Makalah Disajikan dalam Pelatihan Bagi Para Guru TK, SD, SMP, SMA, dan SMK Tanggal 12-14 Januari 2009, Di Kecamatan Nusa Penida kabupaten Klungkung
Joni, T.R. 2000. Rasional Pembelajaran Terpadu. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Regional: Implementasi Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Menyongsong Era Indonesia Baru: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang, 20 Mei 2000
Kemdikbud 2013. Konsep Pendekatan Saintifik dalam pembelajaran. Makalah disajikan pada acara diklat guru dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013.
Kilic, A. (2010). Learner-centered micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3 (1): 77-100.
Leavell, A.G. 1996. Portfolio assessment: Some questions, some answers, some recommendations. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39 (6), 480-491.
Livingstone. J.A., 1997. Metakognition. An Overview. (online). http://www.ges. Buffalo.edu. Diunduh 22 Agustus 2014.
Maribe Branch, Kent Gustafson, Nienke Nieveen, Tjeerd Plomp. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Halaman 125 – 135. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Mulyasa. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung Cetakan ke tiga Maret 2007. Badung
Mohamad Arwani.2014. Kendala dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
Ohayon, I. H., Kravest, S. Levy. & Roe. . 2009. Metakognitive and interperavere Mental Illness: Theory and Practice. Journal Psychiatry Relat Science. 46 (2): 141-148.
Paul Webb, 2009. Towards an Integrated Learning Strategies Approach To Promoting Scientific Literacy in the South African Context. International Journal of Environment Vol. 4, No. 3, July 2009, 313-334
Plomp, Tjeerd 2001. Development Research in/on Education and Training. Makalah disajikan pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia yang diadakan oleh Universitas Sanata Darma pada tanggal 14-15 November 2001 di Yogyakarta.
______. 2007b. Model Pembelajaran inovatif Berorientasi Konstrutivistik. Surabaya: Prestasi Pustaka
Rita C. Richey, J. D. K., Wayne A. Nelson. (2009). Developmental Research: Studies of Instructional Design and Development.
Sartono, wahyuari.___. Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif diunduh dari (http:// bagooor.wordpress.com/metode-pembelajaran-efektif/) pada tanggal 14 November 2014
Schunk, Dale H., 2012, Learning Theories: An. Educational Perspective, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta
Setyowati 2014. Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Produktif Kelompok Keahlian Akuntansi di SMK Negeri 6 Surakarta. Jupe UNS, Vol 2 No. 3 Hal 312 s/d 322. Juli| 2014
Seels, Barbara B. & Richey, Rita C. 1994. Teknologi Pembelajaran: Definisi dan Kawasannya. Penerjemah Dewi S. Prawiradilaga dkk. Jakarta: Kerjasama IPTPI LPTK UNJ.
Shyi-Huey Wu. (2005). Employability and effective learning systems in higher education. Ninth Quality in Higher Education International Seminar in collaboration with ESECT and The Independent. Birmingham 27th-28th January 2005.
Slamet PH. 2011. Peran Pendidikann Vokasi dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, Edisi Juni 2011, Th. XXX, No. 2
Sudrajat, Ahmad. 2008. Model Pembelajaran Inovatif diunduh dari (http:// akhmadsudrajat.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/model-pembelajaran-inovatif/) pada tanggal 14 november 2014
Sugiyono 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Plomp, Tj. 1994. Educational Design: Introduction. From Tjeerd Plomp (eds). Educational & Training System Design: Introduction. Design of Education and Training (in Dutch). Utrecht (the Netherlands): Lemma. Netherland. Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente
Taccasu Project. (2008) “Metacognition” Tersedia ada: http://www.careers.hku.hk/ taccasu/ ref/metacogn.htm, diakses pada 19 Mei 2014
Tempelaar, D. & Nijhuis, J. (2007). Commonalities in attitudes and beliefs toward different academic subjects. In M. K. McCuddy et al. (Eds), The Challenges of Educating People to Lead in a Challenging World (pp. 225-249). The Netherlands: Springer.
Tessmer, Martin. 1998. Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Undang-undang Sisdiknas Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Pasal 15 Sisdiknas Nomor 20 Tahun 2003
Van den Akker J. 1999. Principles and Methods of Development Research. Pada J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, Nieven, dan T. Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1-14). Dortrech: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van den Akker J., dkk. 2006. Educational Design Research. London and New York: Routledge.
Wina Sanjaya (2008). Perencanaan dan desain sistem pembelajaran. Kencana Prenada Media Group
Wood. K.2013. Design for Teacher Education based on a Systematic Framework of Variation to Link Teaching with Learners ‘Way of Experiencing the Object of Learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 2 (1)c 56-71
Xaviery, 2004. Strategi Pembelajaran Sosiologi Tingkat SMA. http://artikel.us/ xaviery6-04.html. diakses tanggal 27 Augustus 2015
Zita M. Wagner. 1998. Portfolio assessment in vocational education: the assessor's view. Australian Journal of Teacher Education .Volume 23 Issue 2 Vocational Education and Training (VET)
Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2012. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Woolfolk Anita.2008, Educational Psychology, Active Learning Edition, Pearson Education Inc., Boston.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1086
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Dewanto A. Sonhadji, E. Ekohariadi, Eddy Sutadji
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
