Marlon P. Manuel


Explicit corrective feedback has always been a topic of huge interest among educators. While various studies have investigated on certain types of error treatment methods, there has been little research conducted to look into explicit corrective feedback. The current research was designed to investigate the belief system of students on explicit corrective feedback in ESL classroom, particularly in speaking classes. The sample of the study consisted of 30 Omani EFL foundation learners which were randomly selected. In this study a series of qualitative survey tasks were conducted to determine the attitude of the respondents towards the method, the impact to respondents’ speaking fluency and the type of error treatment in which they are at ease most. Results revealed that respondents have positive attitude towards the method as they perceived it as instrumental in improving their speaking errors in grammar, diction, pronunciation and intonation. Additionally, majority of them opined that ECF is on top of all other corrective types when it comes to effect and value owing to its retentive effect. These emphasize the need to foster this method in EFL environment where teacher's feedback is the most important step through which learners improve their language proficiency.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



explicit corrective feedback, belief system, instrumental, retentive effect, speaking skill

Full Text:



Carpenter, H., Jeon, K., MacGregor, D., & Macky, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretation of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209-236.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368

Fu, T. (2012). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a Chinese as a foreign language class: Do perceptions and the reality match? Unpublished master thesis. University of Victoria.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, E. (1997).Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-61.

Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183- 218.

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.

Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595.

Pawlak, M. & Pospieszyn´ska, M. (2003). Does implicit corrective feedback work for pronunciation errors? In W. Sobkowiak & E. Waniek-Klimczak (Eds.). Dydaktyka fonetyki je˛zyka obcego (pp.125–138). Płock: Wydawnictwo Pan´stwowej Wy zszej Szkoły Zawodowej w Płocku.

Pennington, M. C. & Richards, J. C. (1986). Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 207-225.

Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.) Harlow: Longman Group UK Limited.

Rosa, E. & Leow, R. (2004). Computerized task-based exposure, expliteness, type of feedback and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88, 192-216.

Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp.133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2011). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /r/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning.

Sanz, C. (2003). Computer delivered implicit vs. explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction (pp. 241-256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 128-158.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2022. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).