KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION: NURTURING GRASSROOTS INNOVATIONS WITHIN ENVIRONMENTS OF SCARCITY. THE CASE OF COMMUNITY CURRENCY IN KISUMU, KENYA

Michael Oloko, Richard Kiaka

Abstract


Although grassroots innovations often emerge in contexts of scarcity, they rarely fulfil the purposes that originally prompted their inception. Limited local capacity to nurture and protect such initiatives can create opportunities for ‘elite capture’ by more privileged and resourceful actors. This paper brings together two seemingly antagonistic concepts—‘elite capture’ and ‘knowledge co-production’—to inform the introduction and implementation of a community currency as a grassroots innovation in Kisumu. It draws on experiences and lessons learnt from similar initiatives in Mombasa and Nairobi, and applies the principles of knowledge co-production to prevent ‘elite capture’ in Kisumu. The inclusive nature of the knowledge co-production approach—accommodating relevant stakeholders and their diverse interests—its goal-oriented focus, and its emphasis on effective collaborative engagement, combined with the flexibility to allow iterative processes, are employed to safeguard the interests of the most deserving local participants. The paper advances understanding of knowledge co-production and demonstrates its application in facilitating constructive engagement and stakeholder participation to prevent ‘elite capture’. Together, these elements help to ensure local ownership and management of innovations by their intended beneficiaries, thereby strengthening local support mechanisms and empowering the community.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbulut, B., & Soylu, C. (2012). An inquiry into power and participatory natural resource management. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(5), 1143–1162. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24232413

Albert, V. N., Christopher, C., Marie, F. L., Simon, W., Carina, W., Patricia, B., Angela, T. B., Elena, M. B., Reinette, B., Ariane de, B., Bruce, M. C., Josep, G. C., Stephen, R. C., Carl, F., Elizabeth, A. F., Owen, G., Stefan, G., Jean-Baptiste, J., Melissa, L., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2

Anderson, P. M. L., Brown-Luthango, M., Cartwright, A., Farouk, I., & Smit, W. (2013). Brokering communities of knowledge and practice: Reflections on the African Centre for Cities’ CityLab programme. Cities, 32, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.002

Arimah, B. C. (2012). Slums as expressions of social exclusion: Explaining the prevalence of slums in African countries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228856797_Slums_As_Expressions_of_Social_Exclusion_Explaining_The_Prevalence_of_Slums_in_African_Countries

Awoleye, M. O., & Okediran, O. O. (2021). Evaluation of community banking software in developing countries: A focus on flexibility and cost efficiency. Journal of Financial Technology, 14(3), 125–140.

Barinaga, E. (2020). A route to commons-based democratic monies? Embedding the governance of money in traditional communal institutions. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.575851

Barinaga, E., Oloko, M., Ruddick, W. O., & Zapata, C. (2019). Community currencies as means of local economic empowerment: Innovations from Mombasa and Nairobi to Kisumu, Kenya. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335338821_Community_Currencies_as_Means_of_Local_Economic_Empowerment_Innovations_from_Mombasa_and_Nairobi_to_Kisumu_Kenya_-_Swedish_International_Centre_for_Local_Democracy_ICLD_Policy_Brief_no4

Böhm, S., & Brei, V. (2008). Marketing the hegemony of development: Of pulp fiction and green deserts. Marketing Theory, 8(4), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593108096540

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Christenson, A. L. (2013). The co-production of archaeological knowledge: The essential relationship of amateurs and professionals in 20th century American archaeology. Complutum. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CMPL.2013.v24.n2.43367

Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). Zed Books. Retrieved from https://sergiorosendo.pbworks.com/f/Cooke+and+Kothari+2001+Chap+1.pdf

County Government of Kisumu. (2023). Kisumu County Integrated Development Plan (2023–2027) (CIDP III). https://www.kisumu.go.ke/download/kisumu-cidp-iii-2023-2027/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE. Retrieved from https://revistapsicologia.org/public/formato/cuali2.pdf

DiCaprio, A. (2012). Introduction: The role of elites in economic development. In A. H. Amsden, A. DiCaprio, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), The role of elites in economic development. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-role-of-elites-in-economic-development-9780199659036?cc=ro〈=en&

Dissaux, T. (2015). Financing for development: A monetary issue in which money does not have a word. 3rd International Conference on Social and Complementary Currencies. https://socialcurrency.sciencesconf.org/conference/socialcurrency/pages/Financing_for_development_DISSAUX.pdf

Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2010). Mission impossible: Diffusion and drift in the microfinance industry. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021011089248

Fritzen, S. A. (2007). Can the design of community-driven development reduce the risk of elite capture? World Development, 35(8), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.001

Fuest, C. (2005). Economic integration and tax policy with endogenous foreign firm ownership. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1823–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.10.002

Gallien, M., & van den Boogaard, V. (2021). Rethinking formalisation: A conceptual critique and research agenda (ICTD Working Paper 127). Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/ICTD.2021.017

Gilbert, A. (2007). The return of the slum: Does language matter? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(3), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00754.x

Gupta, A. (2012). Innovations for the poor by the poor. International Journal of Technology, Learning, Innovation and Development, 5, 28–39. https://www.idin.org/sites/default/files/resources/Gupta_2012.pdf

Gupta, A., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P., Patel, H., Patel, K., Chand, V. S., James, T. J., & others. (2003). Mobilising grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35, 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00053-3

Gutberlet, J., Kain, J. J., Nyakinya, B., Ochieng, D., Odhiambo, N., Oloko, M. O., Omondi, E., Omolo, J., Zapata, P., & Zapata Campos, M. J. (2016). Socio-environmental entrepreneurship and the provision of critical services in informal settlements. Environment and Urbanization, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815623772

Hajjar, R. F., Kozak, R. A., & Innes, J. L. (2012). Is decentralisation leading to “real” decision-making power for forest-dependent communities? Case studies from Mexico and Brazil. Ecology and Society, 17(1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248393511_Is_decentralization_leading_to_real_decision-making_power_for_forest-dependent_communities_Case_studies_from_Mexico_and_Brazil

Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49, 785–812. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01044.x

Hardoy, J. E., Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Environmental problems in an urbanising world: Finding solutions for cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071732

Hemström, K., Simon, D., Palmer, H., Perry, B., & Polk, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: A guide for sustainable cities. Practical Action Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/9781788531481

Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01024.x

Jens, F. L., & Moeko, S.-J. (2013). Revisiting the issue of elite capture of participatory initiatives. World Development, 46, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.028

Joubert, L., & Mistra Urban Futures Realising Just Cities Team. (2021). Realising just cities (Report). African Centre for Cities & Mistra Urban Futures. https://www.africancentreforcities.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Realising-Just-Cities-final-version-2021.pdf

Kaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.003

Kariuki, P., & Njeri, W. (2018). The burden of compliance: Regulatory costs for small organisations in Kenya. Journal of Development and Social Policy, 9(2), 45–60.

Kiaka, R. D., Oloko, M. O. O., Ocampo, J., & Barinaga, E. (2024). “Gaming the system”: How communities strategise around currencies, convertibility and cash transfers in Kenya. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 9(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v9i6.1689

Labonte, M. T. (2011). From patronage to peacebuilding? Elite capture and governance from below in Sierra Leone. African Affairs, 111(442), 90–115. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41494467

Lauermann, J., & Mallak, K. (2023). Elite capture and urban geography: Analysing geographies of privilege. Progress in Human Geography, 47(5), 645–663. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231186810

Linna, P. (2013). Bricolage as a means of innovating in a resource-scarce environment: A study of innovator-entrepreneurs at the BOP. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946713500155

Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and -driven development: A critical review (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3209). World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14310

Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localising development: Does participation work? World Bank.

Mattsson, C. E. S., Criscione, T., & Ruddick, W. O. (2022). Sarafu community inclusion currency 2020–2021. Scientific Data, 9, 426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01539-4

Meagher, K. (2018). Cannibalising the informal economy: Frugal innovation and economic inclusion in Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 17–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4

Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder governance initiatives: The case of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3

Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/rulingclass031748mbp

Muriuki, J. (2021). Challenges in legal compliance for community-based organisations in Kenya. East African Law Review, 18(1), 29–41.

Musgrave, M. K., & Wong, S. (2016). Towards a more nuanced theory of elite capture in development projects: The importance of context and theories of power. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n3p87

Mwangi, K., & Maina, G. (2018). Regulatory complexity and its impact on small NGOs and CBOs in Kenya. International Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(1), 13–26.

Ng, B. K., Mohamad, Z. F., Chandran, V. G. R., & Mohamad Noor, N. H. (2019). Public policy interventions for grassroots innovations: Are we getting it right? Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 27(3), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2019.1678392

Njoroge, T. (2020). Financial constraints and compliance challenges for self-help groups in Kenya. Journal of Social Economics, 14(3), 101–120.

Oloko, M., & Ness, B. (2020). Local projects retrofitted. In Comparative urban research from theory to practice (pp. 41–62). Policy Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/book/9781447354093/ch003.xml

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X

Palmer, H., & Walasek, H. (2016). Co-production in action: Towards realising a just city. Mistra Urban Futures. https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en/publication/co-production-action-towards-realising-just-cities

Pansera, M., & Owen, R. (2017). Innovation for de-growth: A case study of counter-hegemonic practices from Kerala, India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1872–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.197

Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting sustainable development solutions: Frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(51). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010051

Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society: A treatise on general sociology. Harcourt Brace. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL6319598M/The_mind_and_society

Pareto, V. (1968). The rise and fall of elites: An application of theoretical sociology. Bedminster Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Elites.html?id=SnKHOKGXUZwC&redir_esc=y

Persha, L., & Andersson, K. (2014). Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralised forest governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 24, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.005

Platteau, J. P. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Development and Change, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00350.x

Platteau, J. P., & Abraham, A. (2002). Participatory development in the presence of endogenous community imperfections. Journal of Development Studies, 39(2), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322771

Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Wharton School Publishing/Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-fortune-at-the-bottom-of-the-pyramid-eradicating-poverty-through-profits/

Quistgaard, S. K., & Villadsen, K. (2020). From social gospel to CSR: Was corporate social responsibility ever radical? Organization, 27(6), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419877611

Ramdorai, A., & Herstatt, C. (2015). Bottom of the pyramid concept: Taking stock. In Frugal innovation in healthcare (India Studies in Business and Economics). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16336-9_2

Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy – The politics of choice in natural resource decentralisation (WRI Report). World Resources Institute. http://pdf.wri.org/wait_for_democracy.pdf

Rigon, A. (2014). Building local governance: Participation and elite capture in slum-upgrading in Kenya. Development and Change, 45(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12078

Ruddick, W. (2011). Eco-Pesa: An evaluation of a complementary currency programme in Kenya’s informal settlements. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 15(A), 1–12. https://www.socioeco.org/bdf_fiche-document-887_en.html

Ruddick, W., Richards, M., & Bendell, J. (2015). Complementary currencies for sustainable development in Kenya: The case of the Bangla-Pesa. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 19, 18–30. https://www.socioeco.org/bdf_fiche-document-2161_en.html

Schelenz, L. (2022). Diversity and social justice in technology design. International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies, 5(2), 33–53. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/48755788

Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. Retrieved from https://base.socioeco.org/docs/seyfang_and_smith.pdf

Seyfang, G., Smith, A., & Longhurst, N. (2010). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: A new research agenda. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 12(1), 68–72. https://base.socioeco.org/docs/seyfang_and_smith.pdf

Simon, D., Palmer, H., & Riise, J. (2020). Comparative urban research from theory to practice: Co-production for sustainability. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10tq4cj

Simon, D., Palmer, H., Riise, J., Smit, W., & Valencia, S. (2018). The challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production: From unilocal to comparative research. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818787177

Smit, W., Durakovic, E., Sitas, R., Johansson, M., Haysom, G., Dymitrow, M., Ingelhag, K., & Kotze, S. (2020). Replicating projects for comparative research: Mistra Urban Futures’ experiences with comparative work on knowledge exchange, food and transport. In Comparative urban research from theory to practice: Co-production for sustainability (pp. 63–88). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10tq4cj.10

Smith, A., Fressoli, M., Abrol, D., Arond, E., & Ely, A. (2017). Grassroots innovation movements: Pathways to sustainability. Routledge. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/53011

Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025

Tesfaye, L. A., & Fougère, M. (2021). Frugal innovation hijacked: The co-optive power of co-creation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04883-4

Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Diprose, K., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., & Versace, I. (2020). Internationally initiated projects with local co-production: Urban Sustainable Development Goal project. In Comparative urban research from theory to practice: Co-production for sustainability (pp. 113–132). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10tq4cj.12

Varman, R., Skålén, P., & Belk, R. W. (2012). Conflicts at the bottom of the pyramid: Profitability, poverty alleviation, and neoliberal governmentality. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 19–35. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236693804_Conflicts_at_the_Bottom_of_the_Pyramid_Profitability_Poverty_Alleviation_and_Neoliberal_Governmentality

Warren, C., & Visser, L. (2016). The local turn: An introductory essay revisiting leadership, elite capture and good governance in Indonesian conservation and development programmes. Human Ecology, 44(3), 277–286.

World Bank. (2004). World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/832891468338681960

Zapata Campo, M. J., Barinaga, E., Kain, J., Oloko, M., & Zapata, P. (2019). Organising grassroots initiatives for a more inclusive governance: Constructing the city from below (Research Report No. 15). Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy. https://www.local2030.org/library/676/Organising-grassroots-initiatives-for-a-more-inclusive-governance-Constructing-the-city-from-below.pdf

Zapata Campos, M. J., Barinaga, E., Kain, J., Oloko, M., & Zapata, P. (2022). Organising grassroots infrastructure: The (in)visible work of organisational (in)completeness. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211062818

Zapata Campos, M. J., Carenzo, S., Charles, G., Gutberlet, J., Kain, J.-H., Oloko, M. O., Reynosa, J. P., & Zapata, P. (2023). Grassroots innovations in ‘extreme’ urban environments: The inclusive recycling movement. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(2), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221118191

Zeller, S. (2020). Economic advantages of community currencies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110271

Zeschky, M. B., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research-Technology Management, 57(4), 20–27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5437/08956308X5704235




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v12i1.2142

Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Oloko, Richard Kiaka

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2026. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.