THE EFFECT OF EXPECTED WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE GOVERNANCE ON PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN SIERRA LEONE: A PROBIT MODEL EVIDENCE

Saa Emerson Lamina, Robert Dauda Korsu

Abstract


The study investigates whether support for the proportional representation system of legislative governance in Sierra Leone is linked to an expected increase in women's participation in legislative governance. A Probit model of proportional representation support is estimated using a national survey dataset from all five regions in Sierra Leone, with all 16 districts covered. The results show that among those who support a proportional representation system of parliament, increased women's representation in parliament as a reason is 13.9 percentage points higher than otherwise. In addition, the probability of a respondent supporting proportional representation based on the expected increase in women's participation is 60.7% and is significant at the 1% level. Hence, there are about 39.3% of the sample that do not support PR in spite of its increase in female participation in legislative governance in Sierra Leone. The actual proportion supporting PR based on women's participation in governance is found to be 60.86%, implying that it captures the data well. In addition, overall, the proportion of the sample that supports PR. is 59.0%. Hence, enforcement of the Gender Equality Women Empowerment (GEWE) Act by the Political Party Regulation Commission (PPRC) and the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone is very critical for the enhancement and sustainability of the PR system adopted in Sierra Leone in 2022, which is a tool for inclusive developments in all districts across Sierra Leone, including strengthening maternal and child healthcare, girls’ education and enforcement of gender-based violence laws.

Keywords


proportional representation, women's participation, governance, Probit Model, Sierra Leone

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayuja, A. & MaCledon, G. (2026). The effects of exposure to New Electoral Rules: Field Experimental Evidence from Sierra Leone. American Political Science Association. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055426101518

Banducci, S.A., Donovan, T. & Karp, J.A. (1999). Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: Evidence from New Zealand. Electoral Studies, 18(4), pp. 533-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00019-0.

Baur, G. & Britton, H.E. (eds.) (2006). Women in African Parliaments Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/279/7/Onyejekwe_CJ_2007_Review_Women_in_African_Parliaments(1).pdf

Belschner, J., Ibenskas, R., & Weiler, F. (2025). When do voters reveal candidate gender preferences? Evidence from individual-level ballot data. European Journal of Political Research, 64(1), pp. 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12679.

Boyle, B. (2024). Engineering democracy: Electoral rules and turnout inequality. Political Studies,72(1), pp. 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221096563.

Clayton, A., Josefsson, C., & Wang, V. (2017). Quotas and women’s substantive representation: Evidence from a content analysis of Ugandan plenary debates. Politics and Gender, 13(2), pp. 276-304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000453

Dhlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies,11(4), pp. 275-298.

Gallego, A., Rodriquez-Pose, A., & Staddon, C. (2014). Is decentralisation good for development? Evidence from Switzerland and Bolivia. Regional Studies, 48(5), pp. 759-777.

Golder, M., & Ferland, B. (2017). Electoral systems and citizens-elite ideological congruence. In E. S. Herrorn, R. Pekkanen, and M.S Shugart (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. pp. 213-246. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.11

Gonzalez-Eiras, M., and Sanz, C. (2021). Women’s representation in politics: The effect of electoral systems. Journal of Public Economics vol. 198. pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104399

Kanter, R.M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), pp. 965-990.

Lee, D.S., & McClean, C.T. (2026). How do underrepresented voters view electoral system trade-offs? Electoral Studies, 99. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379425001428

Lindberg, S.I. (2004). Democratisation and women’s empowerment: The effect of electoral systems, participation and repetition in Africa. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(1), pp. 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686314.

Liphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bg23

Longman, T. (2006). Rwanda: Achieving equality or serving an authoritarian state? In G. Bauer and H.E Britton (Eds.), Women in African Parliaments (pp. 133-150); Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Ragauskas, R. (2021). Party-determined viability and gender bias in open-list proportional representation systems. Politics and Gender, 17(2), pp. 250-276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000448.

Stockemer, D. (2011). Women’s parliamentary representation in Africa: The impact of democracy and corruption on the number of female deputies in national parliaments. Political Studies, 59(3), pp. 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00876.x

Tambe, E.B., & Jormfeldt, J. (2024). Addressing the gender gap: Impact of institutions on women’s political participation in Africa. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 65(2), pp. 140-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152241253206

Yoon, M.Y. (2004). Explaining Women’s Legislative Representation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29, pp. 447-468. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598562




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpss.v9i2.2263

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Saa Emerson Lamina, Robert Dauda Korsu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017 - 2026. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.