NEGATIVE DIALECTICS OF PROGRESS IN THE PLANET OF THE APES TRILOGY: FROM TECHNOPHILIA TO TECHNOPHOBIA

Abir Amezzane

Abstract


The reboot Planet of the Apes Trilogy, Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011), Dawn of the Planet of the Apes (2014), and War for the Planet of the Apes (2017), begins with a recognizably technophilic promise: scientific innovation will overcome biological vulnerability. Yet the attempt to cure Alzheimer’s disease produces the Simian flu, resulting in the acceleration of ape cognition and precipitating human civilisational collapse. This article argues that the trilogy stages a negative dialectic of progress in which the rational instruments designed to extend human life and our mastery over disease and nonhuman nature generate new forms of vulnerability, domination, and regression. By reading the films through the Frankfurt School critique of instrumental reason and William Leiss’s account of the domination of nature, the article aims to trace a movement from technological confidence to technological fear. It focuses on Gen-Sys, animal experimentation, the pandemic, the persistence of weaponry after social collapse, as well as the visual reclamation of San Francisco by the growing vegetation. The trilogy does not simply condemn technology, nor is that the aim of this paper; rather, the paper aims to show how the trilogy questions a model of progress in which scientific capacity is detached from any ethical responsibility and organized around total domination and control. The trilogy’s dystopian force lies mainly in demonstrating how humanity’s attempt to control nature through science and technology ultimately contributes to its own downfall.


Keywords


Planet of the Apes; technological progress; technophilia; technophobia; instrumental reason; dystopia; domination of nature.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes. Translated by Xan Fielding, Del Rey, 2001.

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Matt Reeves, performances by Andy Serkis, Jason Clarke, Gary Oldman, and Keri Russell, 20th Century Fox, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2103281/

Greene, Eric. Planet of the Apes as American Myth: Race and Politics in the Films and Television Series. McFarland, 1996. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Planet_of_the_Apes_as_American_Myth.html?hl=pt-PT&id=1L8IEQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, translated by Edmund Jephcott, Stanford UP, 2002. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Dialectic_of_Enlightenment.html?id=HIkwCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Ingram, Penelope. “Simian Flu or Ebola Redux.” Imperiled Whiteness: How Hollywood and Media Make Race in “Postracial” America, UP of Mississippi, 2023, pp. 101–24. https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496845498.003.0004

Kilgore, De Witt Douglas. “Planet of the Apes.” Oxford Bibliographies in Cinema and Media Studies, Oxford UP, 31 July 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0318

Leiss, William. The Domination of Nature. McGill-Queen’s UP, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/3102334

Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Rupert Wyatt, performances by James Franco, Andy Serkis, Freida Pinto, and John Lithgow, 20th Century Fox, 2011. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1318514/

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. 1818. Edited by J. Paul Hunter, 2nd ed., W. W. Norton, 2012. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Frankenstein_or_The_Modern_Prometheus.html?id=2Zc3AAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y

War for the Planet of the Apes. Directed by Matt Reeves, performances by Andy Serkis and Woody Harrelson, 20th Century Fox, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3450958/

West, Thomas J., III. “Going Ape: Animacy and Affect in Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011).” New Review of Film and Television Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, 2019, pp. 236–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2019.1602980




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v7i2.742

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2026. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.