THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARABIC LANGUAGE ENVIRONMENT IN ENHANCING COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE IN TEACHING ARABIC AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE: AN APPLIED STUDY AT THE FACULTY OF USULUDDIN, SULTAN SHARIF ALI ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY (UNISSA) BRUNEI DARUSSALAM

Achmad Yani, Siti Sara Binti Haji Ahmad, Rafidah Binti Haji Abdullah, Siti Shalihah, Anis Malik Thoha

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Arabic linguistic environment in developing communicative competence among first-year students at the Faculty of Sharia, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University, Brunei Darussalam. Grounded in the theoretical frameworks of second language acquisition and educational communication, the research proceeds from a central hypothesis: that an interactive Arabic-speaking environment constitutes a critical component in fostering communicative competence, particularly within non-Arabic university contexts where Arabic is taught for communicative purposes. The study adopts a descriptive-evaluative quantitative methodology, renowned for its precision in analyzing educational phenomena through measurable indicators that are amenable to objective statistical analysis. The research instrument employed is a closed-ended questionnaire constructed on a five-point Likert scale, encompassing several key dimensions: the availability of Arabic language input, in-class and extracurricular interaction, and the use of Arabic in visual media across the university setting. Data were collected from a purposive sample of 22 students, representing 63% of the target population. Analytical procedures included percentage analysis, weighted mean scores, and standard deviations, supported by established theoretical models such as Krashen’s Input Hypothesis (1985), Canale and Swain’s Communicative Competence Framework (1980), and Oxford’s Language Learning Strategies Model (1997). The findings reveal several pivotal indicators. Notably, 83.3% of the respondents affirmed the presence of a stimulating Arabic environment conducive to daily communication—reflecting the successful application of the “comprehensible input” principle within a low-anxiety learning context. Moreover, the study observed a high level of vertical interaction between instructors and students (86.7%), contrasted by a lower rate of horizontal peer interaction (71.7%), indicating limited informal social use of Arabic. The presence of Arabic in formal visual displays ranged between 66.7% and 76.7%, suggesting an incomplete immersion environment. However, extracurricular activities demonstrated a positive impact on the development of both oral (75%) and written (73.3%) skills, though the findings underscore the need for greater curricular support for writing proficiency. These results underscore the necessity of reforming educational policies to foster a holistic, low-anxiety Arabic language environment rooted in authentic communicative interaction, immersive exposure, and a balanced integration of formal and informal inputs—thereby enhancing communicative competence in Arabic as a foreign language across Asian university settings. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


environment, language, Arabic, communicative competence, Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards Intercultural Communicative Competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), pp. 57–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, pp. 112–123. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Principles_of_Language_Learning_and_Teac.html?id=jUF0QgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://octovany.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/ok-teaching-by-principles-h-douglas-brown.pdf

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), pp. 1–47. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Merrill-Swain/publication/31260438_Theoretical_Bases_of_Communicative_Approaches_to_Second_Language_Teaching_and_Testing/links/0c960516b1dadad753000000/Theoretical-Bases-of-Communicative-Approaches-to-Second-Language-Teaching-and-Testing.pdf

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge, pp. 45–49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson, pp. 155–159. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED672918

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill, p. 103. Retrieved from https://saochhengpheng.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jack_fraenkel_norman_wallen_helen_hyun-how_to_design_and_evaluate_research_in_education_8th_edition_-mcgraw-hill_humanities_social_sciences_languages2011.pdf

Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman, pp. 88–120. Retrieved from https://s1.papyruspub.com/files/demos/products/ebooks/academicbooks/applied-linguistics/Preview-The-Practice-of-English-Language-Teaching.pdf

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman, pp. 31–39. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Input_Hypothesis.html?id=5ttoAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–101. Retrieved from https://www.library.brawnblog.com/How%20Languages%20are%20Learned.pdf

Littlewood, W. (2004). Foreign and Second Language Learning. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Foreign_and_Second_Language_Learning.html?id=lbUXHB_dRiEC&redir_esc=y

Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), pp. 319–326. Retrieved from https://educacion.udd.cl/files/2017/04/CGG_Task_based_final.pdf

Muijs, D. (2011). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, pp. 78–79. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/doing-quantitative-research-in-education-with-spss-2e/toc

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York: Routledge, pp. 103–106. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359163061_Language_Curriculum_Design_ISP_Nation_John_Macalister

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Heinle & Heinle. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/secondlanguagete0000nuna

Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, and Interaction: Three Communicative Strands in the Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), pp. 37–42. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/328888

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

Shohamy, E. (2006). Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203387962

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615245

Ur, P. (2012). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–119. Retrieved from https://sacunslc.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/penny-ur-a-course-in-language-teaching-practice-of-theory-cambridge-teacher-training-and-development-1996.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v9i2.633

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Yani, Siti Sara Binti Haji Ahmad, Rafidah Binti Haji Abdullah, Siti Shalihah, Anis Malik Thoha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2026. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.