EFFECTS OF EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION IN METACOGNITIVE WRITING STRATEGIES ON MOROCCAN ENGLISH DEPARTMENT LEARNERS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Mohammed Msaddek

Abstract


Given the high momentum gained through prior evidence-based research on the synergy between metacognition and writing performance, the current study is oriented toward testing the impact of explicit metacognitive writing strategies instruction (EMWSI) on Moroccan university-level learners’ expository and argumentative writing achievement in English (L3). Based on a one-group pretest-posttest design, this experimental study targeted an EFL group consisting of 55 university-level students. A paired-samples t-test was adopted with a view to drawing a clear-cut distinction between the pre-test and post-test writing outcomes attained by a single group of participants (n=55). In this regard, a variety of research instruments were implemented such as the writing tests (i.e., pre-test, post-test), the writing strategy intervention, and the weekly out-of-class writing assignments (expository & argumentative essays). The results uncovered that the targeted EFL subjects did benefit from the conducted explicit metacognitive writing strategies (i.e., planning, monitoring, evaluating) instruction as they achieved tangible, developmental advancement in writing performance scores at post-testing. Hence, a wide range of strategic courses of action relative to L3 writing instruction and pedagogy within the higher education landscape are recommended, and a host of stark limitations regarding the study are offered.

Keywords


metacognition, metacognitive writing strategies, self-regulation, writing strategy instruction, L3 writing performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aripin, N., & Rahmat, N.H. (2019). Exploring metacognitive writing strategies in the writing process using think-aloud protocol: A study across gender. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 178-187. https://doi.org/10.20448/801.41.178.187

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-98526-000

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828401500213

Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. In R.F. Baumeister, Self-regulation and Self-control, (pp. 79-128), New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.04.001

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003758167-5/metacognition-executive-control-self-regulation-mysterious-mechanisms-ann-brown

Cer, E. (2019). The instruction of writing strategies: The effect of the metacognitive strategy on the writing skills of pupils in secondary education. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019842681

Craswell, G., & Poore, M. (2011). Writing for Academic Success (2nd edition). London: SAGE Publications.

Decker, S.L., Roberts, A.M., Roberts, K.L., Stafford, A.L., & Eckert, M.A. (2016). Cognitive components of developmental writing Skill. Psychology in the Schools, 53(6) pp. 617-625. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21933

Eggen, P., & Schellenberg, S. (2010). Human memory and the new science of learning. In M. S. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education (pp. 79-107). New York: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_5

Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Besnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s Oral Communication Skills. New York: Academic Press.

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-97150-000

Gopee, N., & Deane, M. (2013). Strategies for successful academic writing - institutional and non-institutional support for students. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1624-1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.004

Han, L. (2024). Metacognitive writing strategy instruction in the EFL context: Focus on writing performance and motivation. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi:10.1177/21582440241257081

Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-98203-001

Huang Y., & Zhang L.J. (2022). Facilitating L2 writers’ metacognitive strategy use in argumentative writing using a process-genre approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036831

Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy and S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-98203-003

Khosravi, R., Dastgoshadeh, A., & Jalilzadeh, K. (2023). Writing metacognitive strategy-based instruction through flipped classroom: An investigation of writing performance, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00264-8

Kirin, W. (2010). Effects of extensive reading on students’ writing ability in an EFL class. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 285-308. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289304714_Effects_of_extensive_reading_on_students'_writing_ability_in_an_EFL_class

Lam, R. (2018). Promoting self-reflection in writing: A showcase portfolio approach. In A. Burns, & J. Siegel (eds.), International Perspectives on Teaching Skills in ELT (pp. 219-231). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63444-9_16

Li, S. (2023). Working memory and second language writing: A systematic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 647-679. https://doi:10.1017/S0272263123000189

Liu, P., Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2022). Flow experience in foreign language writing: Its effect on students’ writing process and writing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952044

Lu, X. F., & Ai, H. Y. (2015). Syntactic complexity in college-Level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003

Lv, F., & Chen, H. (2010). A study of metacognitive-strategies-based writing instruction for vocational college students. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p136

Matlin, M. W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Cognition.html?id=k2kbAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Moshirirad, M., Marzban, A., & Najafi Karimi, S. (2025). The effect of blended metacognitive writing strategy instruction on the writing performance and metacognitive awareness of Iranian advanced EFL learners: Stated attitude versus actual practice. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 5(1), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.57647/jals.2025.0501.10

Msaddek, M. (2016). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on Moroccan EFL learners’ strategy use and reading achievement. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(3), 271-285. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no3.2

Msaddek, M. (2025). Embedding Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Instruction in Tertiary Education. England: Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Retrieved from https://cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-0364-5781-5/

Nourazar, S., Kakvand, R., & Aliasin, S. H. (2022). The impact of scaffolded metacognitive writing strategy instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ IELTS writing task 2. Education Research International. 2022, 1-8. https://doi:10.1155/2022/6297895

Oktoma, E., Rafli, Z., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Metacognitive learning strategies in argumentative writing skills. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3795

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3

Pitenoee, M. R., Modaberi, A., & Ardestani, E. M. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive writing strategies on content of the Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 594-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.19

Rahimi, M., & Abedi, S. (2015). The role of metacognitive awareness of listening strategies in listening proficiency: The case of language learners with different levels of academic self-regulation. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp.169-192). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_7

Saleh, N. M. A., Mutahar, A. A.-M. M., & Alwai, A. M. S. (2025). Metacognitive writing strategies of master students in the departments of English at Yemeni universities. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i1.2047

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The Educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40 (2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distant nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677. https://doi:10.2307/3587400

Sitko, B. M. (1998). Knowing how to write: Metacognition and writing instruction. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 93-115). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07283-004

Teng, F. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493

Teng, M. F., & Yue, M. (2023). Metacognitive writing strategies, critical thinking skills, and academic writing performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09328-5

Teng, M.F., Qin, C. & Wang, C. (2021). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Vijayan, B. N., Hanafi, N.H., & Amaruddin, H.S. (2025). The influence of metacognitive writing strategies on foundation students’ writing performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9), 467-476. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i9/26501

Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779

Wang, K., Zhang, L. J., & Cooper, M. (2025). Metacognitive instruction for improving the effectiveness of collaborative writing for EFL learners’ writing development. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34 (4), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00886-7

Wang, Y. & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11 (1), 81-92. https://doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003

Wei, J., Chen, J., & Adawu, A. (2014). Teaching ESL beginners metacognitive writing strategies through multimedia software. The CATESOL Journal, 26(1), 60-75. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1111902.pdf

Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. London: Prentice-Hall International. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Learner_Strategies_for_Learner_Autonomy.html?id=JqowSwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19 (4), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515

Xiao, Y. (2007). Applying metacognition in EFL writing instruction in China. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(1), 19-33. Retrieved from https://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/19-34xiao.pdf

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532 6985ep3004_8

Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v9i2.725

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2026. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2602 - 0254 / ISSN-L 2602 - 0254). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.