WHERE IS THE LINE? GENERATIVE AI, PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT, AND INCLUSIVE PRACTICE

Tonia De Giuseppe, Julie A. Delello

Abstract


Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is becoming an increasingly common part of educational practice, raising new questions about how educators determine when AI-generated materials are appropriate for supporting students with diverse needs in inclusive classrooms. This mixed-methods study examined how 351 educators in Italy used GenAI in inclusive practice and how they determined when its use was appropriate. Quantitative analyses examined patterns of GenAI use, training, and perceptions, while qualitative analyses explored educators’ experiences, concerns, training needs, and the professional judgments that guided their use of GenAI. Findings indicated that educators were already using GenAI to support inclusive practice despite limited formal preparation, with nearly half reporting no training in its educational use. Participants consistently emphasized the need for practical, classroom-based professional development and described reviewing, adapting, and evaluating AI-generated materials before using them with students. They also expressed concerns about overreliance, loss of critical thinking, bias, privacy, and whether AI-generated outputs could adequately address the needs of individual learners. Framed through the Artificial Intelligence Agent-Pedagogical Content Ethical Knowledge (AIA-PCEK) framework, the findings suggest that effective use of GenAI in inclusive practice depends not only on access to AI tools but also on educator preparation and professional judgment.

Keywords


inclusive education, artificial intelligence, technology, professional development, professional judgment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-kfairy, M., Mustafa, D., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., & Alfandi, O. (2024). Ethical challenges and solutions of generative AI: An interdisciplinary perspective. Informatics, 11(3), Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

De Giuseppe, T., Delello, J. A., & Anaya, E. (2026). Perceptions of generative AI for inclusive instruction among educators. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-24. Retrieved from https://inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/583

De Giuseppe, T. (2024). The impact of Artificial intelligence in democratic education: Decidim, Flipped inclusion and the challenges of inclusion. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v4i1.151

De Giuseppe, T. (2024). Felice Corona’s inclusive existential pedagogy: systemic axiology and salutogenic didactic care. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 4(2sup). Retrieved from https://inclusiveteaching.it/index.php/inclusiveteaching/article/view/214

Delello, J. A., Sung, W., Mokhtari, K., & De Giuseppe, T. (2024a). Are K-16 educators prepared to address the educational and ethical ramifications of artificial intelligence software? In K. Arai (Ed.), Advances in information and communication: FICC 2024 (pp. 406-432). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54053-0_28

Delello, J. A., Sung, W., Mokhtari, K., Hebert, J., Bronson, A., & De Giuseppe, T. (2025). AI in the classroom: Insights from educators on usage, challenges, and mental health. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020113

Delello, J. A., Watters, J. B., & Garcia-Lopez, A. (2024b). Artificial intelligence in education: Transforming learning and teaching. In J. A. Delello & R. R. McWhorter (Eds.), Disruptive technologies in education and workforce development (pp. 1-26). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3003-6.ch001

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66, 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7

Fitas, R. (2025). Inclusive education with AI: Supporting special needs and tackling language barriers. AI and Ethics, 5, 5729-5757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00824-3

Gambacorta, L., Jappelli, T., & Oliviero, T. (2025). Exploring household adoption and usage of generative AI: New evidence from Italy (BIS Working Papers No. 1298). Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/work1298.htm

Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., & Rienties, B. (2025). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(11), 2518-2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886

Goldman, S. R., Taylor, J., Carreon, A., & Smith, S. J. (2024). Using AI to support special education teacher workload. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241257240

Gonzales, S. (2024, August 6). AI literacy and the new digital divide: A global call for action. UNESCO Global AI Ethics and Governance Observatory. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/articles/ai-literacy-and-new-digital-divide-global-call-action

Han, X., Peng, H., & Liu, M. (2025). The impact of GenAI on learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Educational Research Review, 48, Article 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100714

Hassen, M. Z. (2025). The impact of AI on students’ reading, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. American Journal of Education and Information Technology, 9(2), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajeit.20250902.12

Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I.-A., Wasson, B., & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence and education: A critical view through the lens of human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Artificial_intelligence_and_education.html?id=RM-lEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Judijanto, L. (2025). Beyond access: Cultural, ethical, and infrastructural challenges of AI in marginalised education contexts. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(6), 83-98. Retrieved from https://ejceel.com/index.php/journal/article/view/281

Kadaruddin, K. (2023). Empowering education through generative AI: Innovative instructional strategies for tomorrow’s learners. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), 618-625. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.215

Linsenmayer, E. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence to support students with special education needs (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers No. 46). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e3dffa9-en

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Dartmouth College. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220605142_A_Proposal_for_the_Dartmouth_Summer_Research_Project_on_Artificial_Intelligence_August_31_1955

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Research.html?id=JFN_BwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Mimoudi, A., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). “AIA-PCEK”: A new framework for teaching with AI. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2563171. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2563171

Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito. (2025). Linee guida per l’introduzione dell’intelligenza artificiale nelle istituzioni scolastiche: Allegato al DM n. 166 del 09/08/2025. Retrieved from https://www.mim.gov.it/documents/20182/0/MIM_Linee%2Bguida%2BIA%2Bnella%2BScuola_09_08_2025-signed.pdf

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N., & Mian, A. (2025). A comprehensive overview of large language models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 16(5), Article 106, 1-72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3744746

OpenAI. (2022, November 30). Introducing ChatGPT. Retrieved from https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/623da898-en

Pew Research Center. (2025, September 17). AI in Americans’ lives: Awareness, experiences and attitudes. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2025/09/17/ai-in-americans-lives-awareness-experiences-and-attitudes/

Peterson, S. P. (2025). Addressing student use of generative AI in schools and universities through academic integrity reporting. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1610836. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1610836

Sakowicz, M., & Hamidi, F. (2025). Exploring the role of generative AI in supporting students with disabilities, through the lens of universal design for learning. American Journal of STEM Education, 15, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32674/yeyaaq64

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 1-23. Retrieved from https://citejournal.org/volume-23/issue-1-23/editorial/editorial-chatgpt-challenges-opportunities-and-implications-for-teacher-education/

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373724

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Retrieved from https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/salamanca-statement-and-framework.pdf

United Nations Children’s Fund. (2021). Seen, counted, included: Using data to shed light on the well-being of children with disabilities. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-with-disabilities-report-2021/

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf

Van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Varsik, S., & Vosberg, L. (2024). The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers No. 23). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en

Wang, M., Tlili, A., Khribi, M. K., Lo, C. K., & Huang, R. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in special education: A systematic review through the lens of the mediated-action model. Information Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251335655

Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/monograph/9780934613262/artificial-intelligence-and-tutoring-systems

Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024). Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1839-1850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Chen, X. (2025). The use of generative AI by students with disabilities in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 66, Article 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v12i6.6938

Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Special Education Research (ISSN 2501 - 2428) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).