THE USER EXPERIENCE OF AI-BASED TEACHING AND LEARNING AND ITS IMPACT OF ENGLISH LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN CHINA / 中国小学英语教学中AI技术的用户体验与学习效果研究

Zhong Yongfei, Chng Lay Kee

Abstract


To improve English competence, this study examines the complex requirements and benefits of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in Chinese primary schools. Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and classroom observations offer multifaceted perspectives from educators and learners who have personally navigated the implementation of intelligent technology. The findings demonstrate divergent views among teachers, with optimism regarding the success of tailored instruction balanced against pessimism regarding the lack of nuanced cultural contextualisation in algorithmic materials. While students concur with these ideas, they also emphasise that teacher supervision creates a balance between directive feedback and creative or emotional development. Direct observations in the classroom show growing digital divides, technology limitations, and a reluctance to abandon tried-and-true instructional strategies. The possibility of upending paradigms necessitates reevaluating assumptions, such as the inevitability of data-driven, automated Education. The findings raise questions about whether conversational bots and intelligent tutors can enhance skill efficiency to the extent that they do so without compromising equity, holistic development, and the risks associated with passive student dependency. The empirical study encourages methodical execution, maximising personalised and interactive learning experiences offered by AI systems, while maintaining strong teacher-student relationships and avoiding fragmented development. It informs policies that prioritise thoughtful, culturally appropriate design without using rhetoric associated with "techno-solutionism". The findings present a novel integration philosophy that reconciles quantifiable productivity with high-quality learning experiences and self-actualisation. As intelligent technology becomes more ubiquitous, academics must continue to be cautiously optimistic while providing a clear description of implementation realities as they move from theory to practice. This study prompts us to consider what Education needs to become and should become in an era of increased immersion.  

 

本研究通过半结构化访谈、焦点小组和课堂观察,探讨人工智能在中国小学英语教学中的应用现状。教师群体对AI个性化教学持谨慎乐观态度,但普遍担忧算法材料缺乏文化适应性;学生则认为教师监督能平衡AI的反馈与创造力培养。课堂观察揭示了数字鸿沟、技术局限性和传统教学惯性等问题。研究提出量化效率与人文关怀并重的整合路径,为AI教育产品的文化适配性和伦理设计提供政策建议。

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


AI integration, cultural contextualisation, teacher mediation, equity in Education, ethical considerations / 人工智能教育,文化适配,教师中介,教育公平,小学英语

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 237–258. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0144739418775787#tab-contributors

Adeoye, A. A., & Olanrewaju, A. O. (2019). Use of the technology acceptance model (TAM) to evaluate library electronic information resources use by undergraduate students of Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-24. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333103888_Use_of_Technology_Acceptance_Model_TAM_to_Evaluate_Library_Electronic_Information_Resources_use_by_Undergraduate_Students_of_Lead_City_University_Ibadan_Nigeria

Adetayo, A.J. and Oyeniyi, W.O. (2023). "Revitalising reference services and fostering information literacy: Google Bard's dynamic role in contemporary libraries", Library Hi Tech News, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-08-2023-0137

Ahmad, K., Qadir, J., Al-Fuqaha, A., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Benhaddou, D., & Ayyash, M. (2020). Data-driven artificial intelligence in Education: A comprehensive review. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10247566

Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M. K., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness, and safety in Education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8

Ahmad, T. (2023, June 12). Personalised Learning through the Magic of Artificial Intelligence (AI). www.linkedin.com. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/personalized-learning-through-magic-artificial-ai-tabish-ahmad

Ai, Trusec. (2023, June 6). How AI Is Personalising Education for Every Student. E-learning Industry. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/how-ai-is-personalizing-education-for-every-student#:~:text=AI%2Dpowered%20platforms%20can%20generate

AIContentfy team. (2023, March 5). The role of AI in content curation. AIContentfy. Retrieved from https://aicontentfy.com/en/blog/role-of-ai-in-content-curation

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in Education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Akorbi. (2023). The Risk of Cultural Insensitivity in AI Translations | Akorbi. Akorbi.com. https://akorbi.com/blog/the-risk-of-cultural-insensitivity-in-ai-translations/

Alam, A. (2021, November). Possibilities and Concerns in the Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organisations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31.

Alase, A. (2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9-19.

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2018, December 10). Improvements Ahead: How Humans and AI Might Evolve Together in the Next Decade. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech; Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/12/10/improvements-ahead-how-humans-and-ai-might-evolve-together-in-the-next-decade/

Anis, M. (2023). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Inclusive English Language Teaching: Strategies and Implications for Learner Diversity. Journal of Multi-disciplinary Educational Research, 12(6). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374701500_LEVERAGING_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_FOR_INCLUSIVE_ENGLISH_LANGUAGE_TEACHING_STRATEGIES_AND_IMPLICATIONS_FOR_LEARNER_DIVERSITY

Annamalai. (2023). Using chatbots for English language learning in higher Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(100153), 100153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100153

Askarzai, W., & Unhelkar, B. (2017). Research methodologies: An extensive overview. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 6(4), 21. Retrieved from https://ijsrm.humanjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/3.Dr_.-Walied-ASKARZAI-Bhuvan-Unhelkar.pdf

Balcombe, L., & De Leo, D. (2022). Human-Computer Interaction in Digital Mental Health. Informatics, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010014

Barker, T. (2011). An Automated Individual Feedback and Marking System: An Empirical Study. 9th European Conference on eLearning 2010, ECEL 2010. 9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228614824_An_Automated_Individual_Feedback_and_Marking_System_An_Empirical_Study

Basias, N., & Pollalis, Y. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91-105. Retrieved from https://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_7-s1_sp_h17-083_91-105.pdf

Chen, X., Gascó-Hernandez, M., & Esteve, E. (2023). Cross-cultural transferability of AI in Education: A meta-analysis of implementation barriers. Computers & Education, 185, 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104501

Deuchar, A. (2022). Ethical localisation of AI-powered educational tools: Lessons from global classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 78-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48629244

Gadhvi, M., & Parmar, D. (2023). Real-time language assessment using natural language processing: Accuracy and pedagogical implications. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(2), 210-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00324-z

Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2023). Measuring holistic language development in AI-assisted learning environments: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221145678

Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 168, 104195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104195

Liu, Q., & Ren, X. (2022). Policy-driven AI integration in Chinese K-12 Education: Opportunities and challenges. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00635-0

Nozima, A., & Nusratovich, R. S. (2023). Multidimensional language proficiency assessment in AI-augmented Education. Journal of Language and Education, 9(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.14567

Özdemir-Çağatay, S. (2023). Teacher agency in AI-mediated classrooms: A phenomenological study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, 104007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104007

Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2018). A review of research on AI-facilitated language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 103-118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506

Zheng, L., & Mei, Y. (2021). Sociocultural perceptions of English learning in China: A policy discourse analysis. Language Policy, 20(2), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-020-09575-9




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v10i3.6171

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2026. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).