THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN OPEN TEACHING POLICY IN OPEN EDUCATION IN MAURITIUS

Belle Louis Jinot

Abstract


This paper examines the implications of the implementation of a policy that promotes open teaching in an emerging open university. It describes the benefits and risks associated with such implementation within the context of Mauritius. It emphasises the adoption of cMOOCs which is more student-generated MOOCs that encourages student engagement based on socio-constructivism and heutagogy, instead of behaviourism and cognitivism. The use of open teaching promotes the democratisation of higher education and may help open universities to achieve economies of scale, and therefore making open universities profitable. However, open teaching through the adoption of cMOOCs may lack sustainability due to the political bearing of the open university concerning its governing bodies and the nomination of its head at the management level, the lack of electracy of a large number of contingent teaching staff as well as the lack of safeguard for the intellectual copyrights of MOOCs in Mauritius. It is recommended that open universities should invest massively in technology-enhanced content delivery and in the appointment of a graphic designer to support user-content generation.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


open teaching; implementation; cMOOCs; higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams-Becker, S., et al. (2017). NMC Horizon Report Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Alexander, B. (2006) Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. EDUCAUSE Review.

Bates, T. (2015). What do you mean by open education? [Online]. Available at https://www.tonybates.ca/2015/02/16/what-do-we-mean-by-open-in-education/ (Accessed 15 March 2021)

Cormier, D. (2012). Embracing uncertainty and the strange problem of habituation [Online]. Available at http://daavecormier.com/edblog/2012/01/26/embracing-uncertainty-and-the-starnge-problem-of-habituation/ (Accessed 30 April 2021)

Cormier, D. (2013). What do you mean …open? [Online]. Available at http://davecormier.com/edblog/2013/04/12/waht-do-you-mean-open/ (Accessed 25 April 2021)

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibilities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3(18). [Online]. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2012-18 (Accessed 26 April 2021)

DeRosa, R. (2016). My open textbook: Pedagogy and practice [Online]. Available at http://robinderosa.net/uncategorised/my-open-textbook-pedagody-and-practice/ (Accessed 30 April 2021)

Dwyer, D. C. (1996). The imperative to change our schools, in C. Fisher, D. Dwyer & K. Yocam (Eds). (1996). Education and Technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1): 37-61 [Online]. Available at https://doi.pog/10.1080/14759390100200102 (Accessed 17 April 2021)

Gourlay, L. (2015). Open education as a ‘heterotopia of desire. Learning, media and Technology, 40(3): 310-327 [Online]. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1029941 (Accessed 10 April 2021)

Gunawardena, C., & LaPointe , D (2008). Social and cultural diversity in distance education, in Evans, T., Haughey, M., & Murphy, D. (Eds.). International Handbook of Distance Education, 15(1): 51-70. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

Hylen, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD.

Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A Research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1): 1-16.

Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning in open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course [Online]. Available at https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/rt/printerfriendly/882/1689 (Accessed 30 April 2021)

Lane, A. (2016). Emancipation through open education: Rhetoric or reality? In: Blessinger, Patrick and Bliss, TJ eds. Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education. Open Book Publisher, 31-50.

Lewis, R. (1986). What is open learning? Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 1(2): 5-10.

Li, C., & Zhou, H. (2018). Enhancing the efficiency of massive online learning by integrating intelligent analysis into MOOCs with an application to education and sustainability. Sustainability [Online]. DOI: 10.3390/su/8410020468. Available at www.mdpi.cjournal/sustainability (Accessed 15 April 2021)

Maddox, C. D. (1986). Issues and concerns in special education microcomputing. Computers in the Schools, 2(3): 3.

Mishra, S. (2012). Openness in education: Some reflections on MOOCs, OERs and OD. Commonwealth of Learning.

Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning and sharing: How today’s high education faculty use social media for work and for play. Pearson.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.

Orr, D., van der Hijden, P., Rampelt, F., Rowert, R., & Suter, R. (2018). Towards a Bologna Digital Strategy for higher education. University World News, no. 504 [Online]. Available at http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2018050410025729 (Accessed 1 May 2021)

Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning [Online]. Available at http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf (Accessed 26 April 2021)

Smith, B., Hurth, J., Pletcher, L., Shaw, E., Whaley, K., Peters, M., & Dunlap., G. (2014). A guide to the implementation process: Stages, steps and activities. ECTA Centre: University of North California.

Stacey, P. (2013). The Pedagogy of MOOCs. [Online]. Available at https://edtechfrontier.com/2013/05/11/the-pedagogy-of-moocs/ (Accessed 30 March 2021)

Stracke, M. M. (2016). Open Learning for smart education: open educational practices, strategies and access for all. IEEE Education, Open University of Netherlands.

UNESCO. (2017). Communication and information, “What are open educational resources (OERs)? [Online]. Available at http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/acess-to-knowledge/open-educational-resources/what-are-open-educational-resources-oers/ (Accessed 25 March 2021)

Walberg, H. J., & Thomas, S. C. (1972). Open education: An operational definition and validation in Great Britain and the USA. American Educational Research Journal, 9(2): 197-208.

White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). [Online]. Available at http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171/3049 (Accessed 17 April 2021)

Wiley, D., & Green, C. (2012). Chapter 6: Why openness in education? [Online]. Available at https://library.educause.edu/resources/2012/5/chapter-6-why-openness-in-education/ (Accessed 4 May 2021)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3766

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).