PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS CONCERNING THE MULTIFUNCTIONALITY OF AGRICULTURE IN THEIR MIND MAPS

Mehmet Bahar, Naciye Somuncu Demir, Okan Demir

Abstract


This study aimed at revealing the preservice teachers’ mental images about the concept of agriculture and the functions of agriculture contains through mind maps. The images of a total of 60 Mind Maps were obtained by drawing technique. Mind maps were examined by content analysis in MAXQDA© qualitative data analysis program. As a result of analyses performed by utilizing the agricultural literacy themes, it appeared that the images examined in mind maps were under eight main themes viz ecology, food safety and health, food processing, food production and energy, marketing and distribution, culture, geography and climate, economy and politics, science, technology and engineering. While it was seen that descriptions concerning the food areas and ecology theme were at a level that could be regarded as important, preservice teachers did not produce enough images on economy and marketing network issues.  

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


mind maps, multifunctionality of agriculture, preservice teachers

References


Anderson, S. M., Velez, J. J., & Thompson, G. (2014). An analysis of K-12 teachers’ conceptions of agriculture prior to and during engagement in an agricultural literacy program. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(3), 132-146.

Akyüz, Y. (2013). Determination of opinions and preferences of farmers about multifunctionality: the case of İzmir province. Unpublished master dissertation, Ege University, İzmir.

Balschweid, M. A., Thompson, G. W., & Cole, R. L. (1998). The effects of an agricultural literacy treatment on participating K-12 teachers and their curricula. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39 (4), 1-10

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication

Eason, A. N. (2014). Secondary school agricultural teachers understanding of the differences between agricultural awareness and agricultural literacy in Iowa. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Iowa State University.

Ercan H., Ozen A., Karatepe H., Berber M., & Cengizlier R. (2012). Primary school teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes toward anaphylaxis. Paediatric Allergy Immunology, 23, 428-32.

Frick, M. J., Kahler, A. A., & Miller, W. W. (1991). A Definition and the concepts of agricultural literacy. Journal of Agricultural Education, 32 (2), 49-57.

Haşiloğlu, M. A. (2009). Development and implementation of material on the? Agriculture culture? Topic in regard to constructivist learning theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon

Mısırlıoğlu-Dibek, E., & Bostancı, İ. (2013). Food allergy. Turkish Journal of Paediatric Disease, 7 (4).

Knoblock, N., Ball, A., & Allen, C. (2007). The benefits of teaching and learning abıut agriculture in elementary and junior high school. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(3), 25-36.

Moon, W. (2012). Conceptualizing multifunctional agriculture from a global perspective. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Birmingham.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development-OECD (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards An Analytical Framework: Agriculture and Food, France.

Rogers, M. E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth Edition). New York: Free Press.

Somuncu, N., & Bahar, M. (2011). A New Approach for science education: agriscience. World Conference on New Trends in Science Education, Aydın, 19-23.Kasım.

Somuncu Demir, N. ve Bahar, M. (2014). The opinions of the school administrators about the agricultural practice garden based education model (Tokat province example). Oral presentation, XI. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Adana.

Somuncu Demir, N. ve Bahar, M. (2015). An imaginative analysis of 21st Century children's agriculture and food perceptions. Oral presentation. 5th International Congress of Research in Education (ICRE), Edirne, 8-10 October.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Trexler, C. J., & Suvedi, M., (1998). Perception of agriculture as a context for elementary science teaching a case of change in Sanilac County, Michigan. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39 (4), 28-36.

Powell, D., & Agnew, M. D. (2011). Assessing agricultural literacy elements of project food land and people in k–5 using the food and fiber systems literacy standards. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1),155–170. DOI: 10.5032/jae.2011.01155.

Trexler, C. J., & Suvedi, M., (1998). Perception of agriculture as a context for elementary science teaching; A case of change in Sanilac County, Michigan. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39 (4), 28-36

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences.

(6th Edition). Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.835

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Mehmet Bahar, Naciye Somuncu Demir, Okan Demir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).