Bitar Jarmas, Zedan Raed


Creativity is finding a new way within a given frame and it is the ability to connect between segments of information, materials and experience, which exists in their own right, or were previously connected with different patterns. The current research engaged in solving problems that can be resolved in various ways or that they have several solutions, by excelling students and this in order to measure the level of mathematical creativity related to solving mathematical problems, by measuring the three elements of mathematical creativity: flexibility (multiple solutions), fluency (time needed to solve the problem), innovation (originality of ideas). It is important to emphasize that the way of solving tasks by using as many ways as possible, considered to be as one of the most efficient ways to the discovering and development of mathematical creativity. In the current research, 24 8th grade pupils from several schools have participated, every student received three diverse mathematical problems and was requested to suggest and raise as many solutions or ways to solve as possible for each problem without teacher intervention, while measuring the required time to solve every problem separately for every student by a stopwatch. Additionally, a semi-structured interview was held with each student separately regarding his or her approach to each problem, the interview focused on identifying the mathematical language, in the process of resolving and in the exposure of the pupil’s mathematical thinking process until he or she reached the solution. The research findings indicate that there are differences between the pupils regarding flexibility, as multiple solutions were suggested by the pupils for each problem individually. Differences were also found in the level of innovation among the pupils, hence original solutions and new ideas to solve problems have been received. Moreover, a difference in fluency has been found so that pupils solved in a different time rates, this is despite the fact that all pupils have a very high level of achievement.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



mathematical creativity, mathematical content, excellent pupils


Arbel, B. (1990). Strategies for Solving Mathematical Problems - Part 1. The Open University. Tel Aviv: The Open University Press.

Arieli, M., and Kashty, S. (1997). Lexicon of Education and Teaching. Special Edition of the Teachers Union. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publishing.

Avitan, N. Nesher, P. (2012). The Development of Students' Intuitive Perceptions of the Concept of Infinity. ALAH 46, 13-21.

Gazit, A. And Patkin, D. (2009). The Role of Creativity in Solving Unconventional Problems in Series among Mathematics Teachers in the Elementary School, and Training in Teaching Other Disciplines. Strong Number 2000, Issue 17, 16-24.

Guberman, R. (2010). Division of Simple Fractions: Math Practice, or other Math? Strong Number 2000, Issue 18, 3-9.

Landau, A. (1990). The Courage to Be Talented. Lod: Dvir Publishing.

Landau, A. (1970). The Psychology of Creativity. Jerusalem: The Government Printer.

Leikin, R. (2006). About Four Types of Mathematical Connections and Problem-Solving in Different Ways. ALAH 36, 8-14.

Poye, c. (1961). How do you solve? Translation of Arnon Ben-Nahum. "Otzar HaMoreh" published by the Teachers Union.

Tzahor, D. (2011). Alternative Geometrical Proofs in the Questionnaire of the New Sampling Program. Alah 44, 32-36.

Karnieli, Z. (1997). Education and Revolving it. Published by Kibbutzim College.

Rachmal, S. (2006). A Position Paper and an Implementation Plan for the Nurturing of Excellent and Outstanding Students.

Shweika, Y. (1997). Multi-word. The Complete Dictionary of Modern Hebrew. Jerusalem: Steimatzky Publishing

Stegner, A. (2011). Teacher and Outstanding Mathematics Students in the Classroom, Conceptions and Methods of Action of Teachers in Mathematics Lessons in Elementary School. Strong number 2000, issue 20, 32-39.

Ziv, A. (1990). Gifted. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing.

Babaeva, J.D. (1999). A dynamic approach to giftedness: Theory and practice. High Ability Studies, 10, 51-68.

Coxford, A.F.(1995). The case for connections. In P.A. House & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum (pp. 3-12). USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In Tall, D. (Ed.), Advanced

Mathematical Thinking. (pp. 42-53).Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Falk, R. (2010). The Infinite Challenge: Levels of Conceiving the Endlessness of Numbers. Cognition and Instruction. 28(1), 1-38.

Hodgson, T.R. (1995). Connection as problem- solving tools. In P.A. House & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum (pp. 13-21). USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multipie solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. (pp. 129-145). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. Paper presented at the Working Group on Advanced Mathematical Thinking- Cyprus: CERME-5

Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 31, 73-90.

Martindale, S. (1989). Personality, situation and creativity, In J.A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Hand book of creativity (pp. 211-232). N.Y: Plenum Press.

National Council of Teachers of mathematics.(NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D.A. Grouws. (Ed.), Handbook of research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.

Shani-Zinovich, I., & Zeidner, M. (2009). On being a gifted adolescent: developmental, affective, and social issues. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. (pp. 195–219). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 29(3), 75-80.

Sowder, L.K. (1985). Cognitive psychology and mathematical problem solving: A discussion of Mayer's paper. In E.A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 139-146). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Torrance, E. P.,(1969). Guiding creative talent. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.

אתרי אינטרנט- משרד החינוך, להגדרת התלמידים המצטיינים- נדלו ביום: 11.2.14



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Bitar Jarmas, Zedan Raed

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).