THE ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ACCOUNTABILITY ON ACADEMIC PROFESSIONALISM
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural Politics and Education. New York: Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/42981571
Apple, M. W. (2013). Knowledge, power, and education: The collected works of Michael W. Apple. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Knowledge-Power-and-Education-The-Selected-Works-of-Michael-W-Apple/Apple/p/book/9780415529006
Australian Teachers’ Union (ATU). (1991). Teacher Professionalism (Policy Statement). Melbourne: ATU.
Ball, S. J. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands (Eds.), The Performing School: Managing, Teaching and Learning in a Performance Culture (pp. 210–226). London: Routledge Falmer. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225572669_Performativities_and_fabrications_in_the_education_economy_Towards_the_performative_society
Barnett, R. (1997). Higher Education: A Critical Business. London: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://learnhigher.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/CT&Rbookreviews.pdf
Barnett, R. (2000). Realising the University in an Age of Supercomplexity. London: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3448008
Biesta, G. J. J., & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement (Working Paper 5). Exeter: The Learning Lives Project. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228644383_How_is_agency_possible_Towards_an_ecological_understanding_of_agency-as-achievement
Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044329
Craig, R., Amernic, J., & Tourish, D. (2014). Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12025
Department of Education and Science (DES). (1991). Higher Education: A New Framework (White Paper). London: HMSO.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). The Future of Higher Education (White Paper). London: HMSO.
Dunn, D. (2003). Accountability, democratic theory, and higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802239286
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/231294?seq=1
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Professionalism_the_Third_Logic.html?id=Tgn3sThG8QEC&redir_esc=y
Groundwater-Smith, S., & Sachs, J. (2002). The activist professional and the reinstatement of trust. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764022000024195
Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1050440
Hansen, H. F., Geschwind, L., Kivistö, J., Pekkola, E., Pinheiro, R., & Pulkkinen, K. (2019). Balancing accountability and trust: University reforms in the Nordic countries. Higher Education, 78(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-0358-2
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Academic_Identities_and_Policy_Change_in.html?id=LSZsEs4KrXEC&redir_esc=y
Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K. M., & Blomberg, A. (2020). From professional bureaucracy to competitive bureaucracy—redefining universities’ organization principles, performance measurement criteria, and reason for being. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-10-2019-0111
Knights, D., & Clarke, C. (2014). “It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life”: Fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508396
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
Marini, G., & Reale, E. (2016). How does collegiality survive managerially led universities? Evidence from a European survey. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1070676
Morley, L. (1999). Equity and change in higher education. In Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy (pp. 27–46). London: Macmillan. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780333984239
Morley, L. (2003). Quality and Power in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Quality_And_Power_In_Higher_Education.html?id=3T_oAAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Nakano, S., Beaupré-Lavallée, A., & Bégin-Caouette, O. (2021). Accountability measures in higher education and academic workload: A ten-year comparison. Brock Education Journal, 30(2), 116-116. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1305224.pdf
Nixon, J. (2001). “Not Without Dust and Heat”: The moral bases of the “new” academic professionalism. British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00170
Nixon, J., Marks, A., Rowland, S., & Walker, M. (2001). Towards a new academic professionalism: A manifesto of hope. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690124202
O’Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust (Reith Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/29969/sample/9780521529969ws.pdf
Osborn, M., Croll, P., Broadfoot, P., Pollard, A., McNess, E., & Triggs, P. (1997). Policy into practice and practice into policy: Creative mediation in the primary classroom. In G. Helsby & G. McCulloch (Eds.), Teachers and the National Curriculum (pp. 52–65). London: Cassell. Retrieved from https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/policy-into-practice-and-practice-into-policy-creative-mediation-/
Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/book/26482
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. J. J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice (pp. 187–206). London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472553195.ch-010
Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029220
Sachs, J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010092014264
Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930116819
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy (pp. 57–89). London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203449721-7/coercive-accountability-cris-shore-susan-wright
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/681534
Stahl, G. (2015). “Performance Anxiety: Audit Culture and the Neoliberal New Zealand University”, Culture Unbound, 7(4), pp. 618–626. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1573618
Skinner, B., Leavey, G., & Rothi, D. (2021). Managerialism and teacher professional identity: Impact on well-being among teachers in the UK. Educational Review, 73(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1556205
Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (1998). Changing accountability and autonomy at the “coalface” of academic work in Australia. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and Globalisation (pp. 241–254). London: Sage. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/1408675
Vidovich, L., & Slee, R. (2001). Bringing universities to account? Exploring some global and local policy tensions. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110071039
Walker, M. (Ed.). (2001). Reconstructing Professionalism in University Teaching: Teachers and Learners in Action. Buckingham: Open University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/EBOOK_Reconstructing_Professionalism_In.html?id=v39EBgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher professionalism in new times. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200121
University and College Union (UCU). (2019). Value of university staff pay has plummeted in the last decade, employers’ own research reveals. (Press Release, 4 October 2019). UCU. Retrieved from https://www.ucu.org.uk/article/10342/Value-of-university-staff-pay-has-plummeted-in-last-decade-employers-own-research-reveals
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i1.6461
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Xhuxhi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2026. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



