Chumpon Chanthala, Toansakul Santiboon, Kamon Ponkham


This study focuses on investigating the effects of students’ activity-based on learning approaching management through the popular instruction; STEM Education Instructional Model on the Second Newton’s Law (spring and conservative law) issue for fostering students’ creative thinking abilities of their learning achievements to their students’ perceptions of their physics laboratory classroom environments. Administrations, which the sample size consisted of 48 upper secondary educational students at the 10th grade level from Mahasarakham University Demonstration School with cluster random sampling technique was selected. The purposes of this research study were to analyze of the processing performances and the performance results (E1/E2) efficiency at the determining criteria as 75/75. Students’ learning achievements with the pre-test and post-test design were assessed. Students’ learning achievements of their post-test assessment and their creative thinking abilities of their perceptions to their physics laboratory class towards physics were associated. Using the STEM Education instructional innovation’s lesson plans were managed the instructional activities, the Pre-Test and Post-Test Assessments were designed, students’ creative thinking abilities were fostered with the 24-item Guilford Creative Thinking Questionnaire (GCTQ), and students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environment obtained of the 35-item Physics Laboratory Environment Inventory (PLEI) was determined. Statistically significant were analyzed with the Simple and Multiple Correlations, Standardized Regression Weight Validity (β), and Coefficient Predictive Value (R2) were associated. The results of these research findings have revealed as:  students were evaluated to determine performance criteria with the efficiency of the processing performance and the performance results (E1/E2) of the STEM Education instructional method’s innovation lesson plans to management to the activity-based learning approach indicated that 78.23/75.38, which was higher than standardized criteria of 75/75. Students’ learning achievements of their pre-test and post-test assessing differences were also found evidence at the 0.01 level, significantly. Associations between students’ learning achievements of their post-test assessment indicated that 26% of the coefficient predictive value (R2) of the variance in students’ creative thinking abilities was attributable to their perceptions for the CTAT. Students’ learning outcomes of their post-test assessment, the R2value indicated that 35% of the variances in students’ perceptions to their physics laboratory classes for the PLEI. Students’ perceptions of their PLEI classes, the R2value indicated that 57% of the variances in students’ responses to their creative thinking abilities were attributable to their affecting the activity-based on learning approaching management through the STEM education instructional method for fostering their creative thinking abilities to their learning achievements and their perceptions in physics laboratory classes of upper secondary students at the 10th grade level are provided.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



activity-based on learning, STEM education instructional method, creative thinking abilities, learning achievements, students’ perceptions in physics laboratory classes


Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards, Ministry of Education. (2008). The integration of indicators of the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2008. Retrieved from

Chulawattantoon, M. (2013). Chulwatthana (2556). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology of Thailand. 19 (January - December 2013): pp. 3 – 14.

Fisher, R. (2006). Expanding minds: Developing creative thinking in young learners. CATS: The IATEFL Young Learners SIG Journal, pp. 5-9.

Fisher, D. L. Henderson, D. & Fraser, B. L. (1997). Laboratory environment and student outcomes in senior high school biology classes. American Biology Teacher, 1997. 59, pp. 214-219.

Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J. & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32, pp. 399-422.

Fraser, B. J. & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Science laboratory classroom environments at schools and universities: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation 1, pp. 289-317.

Fraser, B., McRobbie, C. J. and Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom instrument for senior high school students. Science Education, 77, 1-24. 1993.

Koul, R. B., & Fisher, D. L. (2005). Cultural background and students' perceptions of science classroom learning environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in Jammu, India. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 8, pp. 195-211.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms. Research Brief, 115.

Merino, D. C., & López, E. S. (2014). An analysis of the determinants of students’ performance in e-learning. Retrieved on 2014/1/31 from

Ministry of Education. (2015). Basic education curriculum core B.E.2551 (A.D. 2008). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Basic%20Education%20Core%20Curriculum% 20B.E.%202551%20(1).pdf

Moos, R.H. (1974). The Social Climate Scales: An overview, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.

New Jersey Technology and Engineering Educator Association. (2015). STEM education resource. Retrieved from

Office of Social Promotion for Learning and Quality of Youth. (2012). Development of a science-based brainstorming activity model in conjunction with group activities to improve science process skills. Retrieved from

Quek, C. L., Wong, A. F. L. and Fraser, B. J. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and gifted students' attitudes toward chemistry in laboratory classrooms in Singapore. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1): pp. 18-28.

Santiboon, T. (2012). Assessing science students’ perceptions in learning activities achievements in physics laboratory classrooms in Udon Thani Rajabhat University. 2012 International Conference on Education and Management Innovation IPEDR Vol.30 (2012) © (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore.

Santiboon, T. & Fisher D. L. (2005). Learning environments and teacher-student interactions in physics classes in Thailand. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Physics, Mathematics and Technology Education Sustainable Communities and Sustainable Environments: Envisioning a Role for Physics, Mathematics and Technology Education, Victoria, Vancouver, Canada.

Santiboon, T., Thongbu, S. & Saihong, S. S. (2016). Senior Educational Students’ Perceptions of their Master Science Trainee Educational Teachers’ Internships in Teaching Physics for Improving and Creating Attitude Skills on Teaching and Learning Sustainable Developments in Thailand. Academia Journal of Educational Research 4(11), pp. 175-186, November 2016.

Siriratanajit, A. (2013). Relationships between times’ spent habits and learning patterns of undergraduate students in Hatyai University. Retrieved from

Vasquez, J. A., Comer, M. & Sneider, C. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann Dedicated of Teachers. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Chumpon Chanthala, Toansakul Santiboon, Kamon Ponkham

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).