Pilaiwan Klangprapan, Paisarn Worakham, Piyatida Panya


The aims of this research study developed a model evaluation to assess the activity development of students in the Primary Education level in Thailand. The research was conducted by the research and development (R&D) process that it was administered in two phases; to investigate on analyzes the concept of student development activities, assessment of student development activities in primary school classes, and theory-driven evaluation and interviews with those involved with the activities of the students was the first phase. The second phase, creating an evaluation model to assess activity development for primary educational students. The third phase, to trial evaluation model by experimenting with different sized schools which sample consisted of nine schools, including small, medium, and expansion opportunity schools. The fourth phase, to assess the evaluation model that it has developed the tools used to assess the valuation model based on the evaluation of standards development committee to evaluate educational standards. The assessment is the evaluation of the experiment involving 18 experiments. It has found that; to investigation evaluated the events and activities of the primary educational students composed of textbooks, academic papers, the report showed that the factors used to evaluate the activity development of primary students in three key areas: planning activities for developing learners, processing development activities’ learners, and the characteristics of learners were satisfied. The evaluation model to evaluate activity development of primary educational students composed of eight elements, such as; principal, purpose, to be aimed at assessing the objective things, the tools used to evaluate, users assessment form, how to analyze assessment results, evaluation criteria, and assessment report. The experimental evaluation model to evaluate the activity development of primary educational students, the research study has found that expert on the evaluation model has given their opinions on the assessment form. The results are at the high appropriate level in all aspects and all indications are 3 aspects to planning development activities, process development activities for learners, and the quality characteristics of the students. The trial has not found of problems in the form of assessment. Finally, the developing evaluation model to evaluate activity development of primary education students, this is a theoretical validity, the opinions’ experts opine that the item can be measured according to measurement higher than 80%, and the possibilities are appropriate, and to be accurately, comprehensively. 


development, evaluation model, learner, activity, primary educational students


Buason, R. (2006). Project: Assessment research. 2nd edition. Bangkok: A reed Grammy.

Chalieowares, N. (1998). Assessment of the meta model. The zipper try to evaluate education programs. Education Doctoral Thesis. Department of Measurement and Evaluation of Research and Education, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.

Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Chen, H. T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Kanjanawasi, S. (1998). Guide to monitoring and evaluation at the provincial level. Bangkok. The Institute maintains Rajanupab Ministry of Interior

Kanjanawasi, S. (2007). Evaluation theory. Edition 6th. Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.

Lermtrakul, W. (2003). The development of methods to evaluate the success of teacher training programs based on evaluated using a theoretical base. Bachelor thesis Ph.D. Department of Measurement and Evaluation. Department of Research and Educational Psychology. Chulalongkorn University.

Ministry of Education. (2010). The activities of the group as a core curriculum of Basic Education Act BE 2551. 2. Type II: A gathering of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Thailand.

Phiriyanuwat, S. (2006). To assess the educational authorities. Edition 2nd. Chulalongkorn University. Bangkok.

Research and Learning Institute. (2008). How the model system to study the activity of primary school. Bangkok Commercial Publishers. Bangkok.

Stufflebeam, D. L. and A.J. Shinkfield, A. J. (2008). Evaluation Theory. ModelsandApplications.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.

Srisa-ard, B. (2003). Preliminary research. Edition 8: Suveeiiyasat, Bangkok.

Worakham, P. (2014). The evaluation focused on the theory: the dimension of the science assessment. Maha Sarakham

Worakham, P. (2016). The vast bloodhounds. Educational research. University Edition: Taxila Printing. Maha Sarakham.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Pilaiwan Klangprapan, Paisarn Worakham, Piyatida Panya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).