TIME SERIES IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: APPLICATION IN THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE ACHIEVEMENT
Abstract
The study proposes the utility of time series methodology in the study of processes in educational psychology. Conjointly, the study applies time series in the study of cognitive achievement. Thirteen students from seventh to ninth grades performed an inductive reasoning test. The performance was measured in 20 different occasions and the observations were aggregated to generate a times series of 260 observations (20 different occasions by each individual multiplied by 13 participants). Result shows that a seasonal ARIMA (0,0,1) (1,1,1) adequately fits the data through a model comparative approach. Concluding, despites the complexity, ARIMA methodology is capable to investigate process, reducing the object of the study without lost its fundamental properties and dynamical aspects.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Borckardt, J. J., Nash, M. R., Murphy, M. D., Moore, M., Shaw, D., & O’Neil, P. (2008). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research: a guide to case-based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63 (2), 77-95. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.77
Coghlan, A. (2011). A little book of R for time series. Retrieved from https://github.com/avrilcoghlan/LittleBookofRTimeSeries/raw/master/_build/latex/TimeSeries.pdf.
Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1975). Design and analysis of time series experiments. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associate University Press.
Golino, H. F. & Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). The structural validity of the Inductive Reasoning Developmental Test for the Measurement of Developmental Stages. In Adult Development: Past, Present and New Agendas of Research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the European Society for Research on Adult Development, Coimbra, PT. Retrieved from http://www.europeadultdevelopment.org/materials1.html.
Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014). Psychology data from the “BAFACALO project: The Brazilian Intelligence Battery based on two state-of-the-art models – Carroll’s Model and the CHC model”. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), p.e6. doi: 10.5334/jopd.af
Golino, H. F., Gomes C. M. A., Commons, M. L., & Miller, P. M. (2014). The construction and validation of a developmental test for stage identification: Two exploratory studies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19 (3), 37-54.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010a). Avaliando a avaliação escolar: notas escolares e inteligência fluida. Psicologia em Estudo, 15(4), 841-849. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=287123084020
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010b). Estrutura fatorial da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BaFaCalo). Avaliação Psicológica, 9(3), 449-459. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000300011&lng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2010c). Perfis de Estudantes e a relação entre abordagens de aprendizagem e rendimento Escolar. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 41(4), 503-509. Recuperado de http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/6336
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011a). Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 438-447. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722011000300004
Gomes, C. M. A. (2011b). Validade do conjunto de testes da habilidade de memória de curto-prazo (CTMC). Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 16(3), 235-242. doi:10.1590/S1413-294X2011000300005
Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). Validade de construto do conjunto de testes de inteligência cristalizada (CTIC) da bateria de fatores cognitivos de alta-ordem (BaFaCAlO). Gerais : Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 5(2), 294-316. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-82202012000200009&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A. (2013). A Construção de uma Medida em Abordagens de Aprendizagem. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 44(2), 193-203. Recuperado de http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/11371
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2007). Validação do modelo de inteligência de Carroll em uma amostra brasileira. Avaliação Psicológica, 6(2), 167-179. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712007000200007&lng=en&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008). Qualidades psicométricas de um conjunto de 45 testes cognitivos. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 20(1), 195-207. doi:10.1590/S1984-02922008000100019
Gomes, C. M. A. & Borges, O. N. (2009a). O ENEM é uma avaliação educacional construtivista? Um estudo de validade de construto. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, 20(42), 73-88. doi: 10.18222/eae204220092060
Gomes, C. M. A.s, & Borges, O. N. (2009b). Propriedades psicométricas do conjunto de testes da habilidade visuo espacial. PsicoUSF, 14(1), 19-34. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2009c). Qualidades psicométricas do conjunto de testes de inteligência fluida. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(1), 17-32. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712009000100003&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008). Limite da validade de um instrumento de avaliação docente. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(3), 391-401. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712008000300011&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Pinheiro, C. A. R., Miranda, G. R., & Soares, J. M. T. (2011). Validação da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP) em uma amostra Brasileira. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(1), 19-27. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722011000100004
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012a). Incremental validity of the Learning Approaches Scale. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 623-633. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722012000400001
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012b). O que a inteligência prediz: diferenças individuais ou diferenças no desenvolvimento acadêmico? Psicologia: teoria e prática, 14(1), 126-139. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-36872012000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2014). Self-reports on students' learning processes are academic metacognitive knowledge. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(3), 472-480. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201427307
Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Menezes, I. G. (2014). Predicting School Achievement Rather than Intelligence: Does Metacognition Matter? Psychology, 5, 1095-1110. doi: 10.4236/psych.2014.59122
Gomes, C. M. A., de Araújo, J., Ferreira, M. G., & Golino, H. F. (2014). The validity of the Cattel-Horn-Carroll model on the intraindividual approach. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(4), 22-30. doi: 10.1037/h0101078
Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. (2015). A retenção fatorial na abordagem intraindividual: proposição de uma estratégia de triangulação. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(2), 273-279. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712015000200013&lng=en&tlng=pt.
Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., Nascimento, E., & Jelihovisch, E. (2018). Routine Psychological Testing of the Individual Is Not Valid. Psychological Reports, 122(4), 1576-1593. doi: 10.1177/0033294118785636
Montgomery, D. C., Jennings, C. L., Kulahci, M. (2015). Introduction to time series analysis and forecasting (2nd. ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Muniz, M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Pasian, S. R. (2016). Factor structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices. Psico-USF, 21(2), 259-272. doi: 10.1590/1413-82712016210204
Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2018). Proposing a method to create metacognitive school exams. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(8), 119-142. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2313538
Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2017). Three mistaken procedures in the elaboration of school exams: explicitness and discussion. PONTE International Scientific Researches Journal, 73(3), 1-14. doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.3.1
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. (2005a). The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23, 115-128. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003
Van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. (2005b). Explaining after by before. Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25 (34), 408-442. doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2008). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to developmental assessment, modeling and research. In A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer & P. Léna (Eds.). The educated brain: essays in neuro-education (pp. 71-94). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van Geert, P. L. C., & Fischer, K. W. (2009). Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Reconsidered. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M. S. C. & McClelland, J. (Eds.). Dynamic systems and the quest for individual-based models of change and development (pp. 313-336). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (2003). Time Series Analysis. Em J. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 581-606). Volume 2, Handbook of Psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2733
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Felipe Valentini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
