USING VIRTUAL REALITY TOWARDS STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDE IN CHEMICAL BONDING

Tiwi Nur Astuti, Kristian Handoyo Sugiyarto, Jaslin Ikhsan

Abstract


This study is aimed at determining the effectiveness of using virtual reality (VR) toward students’ scientific attitude in chemical bonding. The data was collected through questionnaire consisting of 14 items. A quasi-experiment with a post-test design was employed in this study. The population was the students of 10th public senior high school in Gunungkidul Regency. A total of 96 grade 10th students were cluster randomly selected from a public senior high school. The samples were set into three different classes, namely control group (CG) using a real laboratory, experiment group-1 (EG-1) using a virtual reality integrated hybrid learning, and experiment group-2 (EG-2) using both of them. The data related to students’ scientific attitude were analyzed using ANOVA. Scientific attitude scores were significantly different between the class using a real laboratory, the class that was using virtual reality, and the class that using both of them. This study implies that VR can be used to improve students' scientific attitude.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


scientific attitude, virtual reality, hybrid learning, chemical bonding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antonoglou, L. D., Charistos, N. D., & Sigalas, M. P. (2011). Design, development and implementation of a technology enhanced hybrid course on molecular symmetry: Students’ outcomes and attitudes. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 12(4), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0RP90013C

Anwariningsih, S. H., & Ernawati, S. (2013). Development of interactive media for ICT learning at elementary school based on student self-learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2), 121-128. Retrieved from http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/EduLearn/article/view/8290

Bakar, N., Zaman, H. B., Kamalrudin, M., Jusoff, K., & Khamis. N. (2013). An effective virtual laboratory approach for chemistry. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 78-84. Retrieved from http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2013/special%20issue/78-84.pdf

Çelik, H., Sari, U., & Harwanto, U. N. (2015). Evaluating and developing physics teaching material with algodoo in virtual environment: Archimedes’ principle. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(4) 40-50. Retrieved from https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/viewFile/8084/10020

Cereci, S. (2018). Modern communication education: technological equipment. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(1), 9-16.

Diaz, L. A. & Entonado, F. B. (2009). Are the functions of teachers in e-learning and face-to-face learning environments really different?. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 331-343. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/12_4/28.pdf

Elsunni & Abdelwahed, H. (2014). Stakeholders’ perspective on the efficiency of the virtual laboratory in the development of students scientific research skills in science. American International Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 166-171. Retrieved from http://www.aijssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_2_March_2014/18.pdf

Emina, F. I. (1986). The validation of an inventory of scientific attitude. Journal of the Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 24(2), 171-178.

Er, E., Özden, M., & Arifoglu, A. (2009). A blended e-learning environment: A model proposition for integration of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 449–460.

Fitriyani, N., Wiyarsi, A., Ikhsan, J., & Sugiyarto, K. H., (2018) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097 (2018) 012064. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012064

Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful Implementation of E-learning Pedagogical Considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9

Heng, Y. C., Joo, C.. E, Basri, A. A. M., Leng, H. H., Bari, N. A., Suleiman, R., Som, A. M., Mustafa, S., Mohamed, S. H. O., Yusof, Z. M., Yazid, Z., & Majid, Z. A. (2002). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary School (Curriculum Specification. Science form 2). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Högström, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research Science Education, 40(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3

Ifthinan, D. N. M., & Atun, A. (2019). Virtual laboratory based on inquiry in chemical equilibrium as learning innovations. . International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 10(1), 8-18.

Jabbour, K. K. (2014). An analysis of the effect of mobile learning on Lebanese higher education. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.mii.lt/informatics_in_education/htm/INFE230.htm

Jancirani, R., Dhevakhrisnan, R., & Devi, S. (2012). A study on scientific attitude of adolescent students in Namakkal district. International Educational E-Journal, 1(4), 2-8. Retrieved from https://www.oiirj.org/ejournal/july-aug-sept2012/01.pdf

Kader, H. A. (2011). E-learning systems in virtual environment. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 8(1), 23-29. Retrieved from https://iajit.org/PDF/vol.8,no.1/6.pdf

Kim, P. (2006). Effects of 3D virtual reality of plate tectonics on fifth grade students' achievement and attitude toward science. Interactive Learning Environment, 14(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600697687

Klimova, B. F., & Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia – Social and Behaviour Sciences, 182, 477-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.830

Lalima, & Dangwal, K.L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 05(01), 129-136. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050116

Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(9), 743-760. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660190904

Makarov, E. A., & Makarov, E. L. (2018). Blending pedagogy and digital technology to transform educational environment. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802057M

Maphosa, C., & Bhebhe, S. (2019). Digital literacy: A must for open distance and e-learning (ODEL) students. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(10), 186-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2560085

Muhamad, M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory for learning biology – A preliminary investigation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(11), 2179-2182. Retrieved from https://waset.org/publications/8971/virtual-laboratory-for-learning-biology-a-preliminary-investigation

Olasehinde, K. J., & Olatoye, R. A. (2014). Scientific attitude, attitude to science and science achievement of secondary school student in Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Society Research, 4(1), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n1p445

Osborne, J. Simson. S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pitafi, A. I., & Farooq, M. (2012). Measurement of scientific attitude of secondary school student in Pakistan. Academic Research International, 2(2), 379-392. Retrieved from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.2(2)/2012(2.2-43).pdf

Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preferences International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/10.1.6/1179

Senler, B. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of attitude, anxiety and locus of control. Australian Council for Educational Research, 60(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116629807

Shalihah, F., Supramono, Abdullah. (2019). Blended learning-based media usage to practice problem solving skills. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2544571

Shyr, W. J. (2010). Experiences with a hands-on activity to enhance learning in the classroom. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 8(1), 86-90. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.8,%20No.1%20(2010)/13-Shyr-13.pdf

Stanojević, D., Cenić, D., & Cenić, S. (2018). Application of computers in modernization of teaching science. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(2), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802089S

Sumintono, B., Wibowo, S. A., Mislan, N., & Tiawa, D. H. (2012). Penggunaan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pengajaran: Survei pada guru-guru sains SMP di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17(1), 122-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.251

Tsovaltzi, D., Rummel, N., McLaren, B. M., Pinkwart, N., Scheuer, O., Harrer, A., & Braun, I. (2010). Extending a virtual chemistry laboratory with a collaboration script to promote conceptual learning. International Journal Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1/2), 91-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031262

Woldeamanuel, M., Atagana, H., & Engida. T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult?. African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31-43. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104070

Zhi-qiang, W. (2017). Virtual package design and realization based on 3D visualization technology. Procedia Engineering, 174, 1336-1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.284




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2434

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Tiwi Nur Astuti, Kristian Handoyo Sugiyarto, Jaslin Ikhsan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).