AN ANALYSIS OF HOW PRESERVICE MATH TEACHERS CONSTRUCT THE CONCEPT OF LIMIT IN THEIR MINDS

Mustafa Çağrı Gürbüz, Murat Ağsu, M. Emin Özdemir

Abstract


Recently, people prefer learning information operationally rather than conceptually. In this context, this study was carried out to uncover how preservice math teachers construct in their minds the conceptual definition of limit within the scope of the Calculus Course. The participants of this study consisted of 62 (30 female, 32 male) sophomore students studying in the Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education Department at Uludağ University Faculty of Education in the 2016–2017 academic year. Midterm and final exam questions requiring the use of prior knowledge were used to help collect data. Interviews were conducted with three participants who were chosen for their success. In these interviews, five questions were asked by the researchers to uncover the mathematical thinking levels and abstraction processes of the participants. The methods of semi-structured interviews and observations were used to collect data. The data were video-recorded and transcribed. The transcripts were analyzed and interpreted according to the cognitive actions of the RBC- model and the steps in Sfard’s theory of mathematics learning. Based on the analysis, the participants were found to be more successful in operational information than in conceptual information. Although the preservice teachers were able to accomplish operational learning, it can be said that they could not fully accomplish conceptual learning because they could not identify algebraic representations and could not use reasoning on these representations. Interviews with the participants revealed that they memorized the characteristics of the concept of limit to be successful in the exams. However, conceptual learning did not take place. Understanding how participants learn is believed to benefit the educators who teach the concept of limit.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


conceptual learning, limit, operational learning, RBC model, Sfard’s learning theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbulut, K., & Işık, A. (2005). Limit kavramının anlaşılmasında etkileşimli öğretim stratejisinin etkinliğinin incelenmesi ve bu süreçte karşılaşılan kavram yanılgıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 497-512.

Altun, M., & Yilmaz, A. (2008). High School Students' Process of Construction of the Knowledge of the Greatest Integer Function. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 41(2), 237-271.

Altun, N. (2009). Limit Öğretimine Alternatif Bir Yaklaşım.

Baki, M., & Çekmez, E. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının limit kavramının formal tanımına yönelik anlamalarının incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 3(2).

Barak, B. (2007). Limit konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. [Determination of the misconceptions about limit subject] (Master’s thesis, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

Baştürk, S., & Dönmez, G. (2011). Mathematics student teachers’ misconceptions on the limit and continuity concepts. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 225-249.

Bekdemir, M., & Gelen, S. (2010). The effects of 2005 elementary mathematics education curriculum on the elementary seventh grade students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and skills. Journal of Education Faculty, 12(2), 130-148.

Biber, A. C., & Argün, Z. (2015). The relations between concept knowledge related to the limits concepts in one and two variables. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 4, 501-515.

Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2004). Towards the Emergence of Constructing Mathematical Meanings. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Bukova-Güzel, E. (2007). The effect of a constructivist learning environment on the limit concept among mathematics student teachers. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 7(3), 1189.

Cildir, S. (2012). Vısualızaton of Lımıt in Computer Envıronment and the Vıews of Prospectıve Teachers on Thıs Issue. Hacettepe Unıversıtesı Egıtım Fakultesı Dergısı-Hacettepe Unıversıty Journal of Educatıon, (42), 143-153.

Cornu, B. (1991). Limits, D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, 153-166.

Denbel, D. G. (2014). Students’ Misconceptions of the Limit Concept in a First Calculus Course. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(34), 24-40.

Donmez, G., & Basturk, S. (2010). Pre-service mathematical teachers’ knowledge of different teaching methods of the limit and continuity concept. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 462-465.

Dreyfus, T. (2007). Processes of abstraction in context the nested epistemic actions model. Retrieved on November, 12, 2008.

Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben's consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3), 271-300.

Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2001a). The construction of abstract knowledge in interaction. In PME CONFERENCE (Vol. 2, pp. 2-377).

Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2001b). Abstraction in context II: The case of peer interaction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1(3/4), 307-368.

Ervynck, G. (1981). Conceptual difficulties for first year university students in the acquisition of the notion of limit of a function. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 330-333).

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.

Fernández, E. (2004). The Students' take on the Epsılon-Delta Definition of a Limit. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 14(1), 43-54.

Gass, F. (1992). Limits via graphing technology. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 2(1), 9-15.

Hassan, I., & Mitchelmore, M. (2006). The role of abstraction in learning about rates of change.

Hershkowitz, Dreyfus & Schwarz, B. (2006). Mechanisms for consolidating knowledge constructs. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 465.

Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 195-222.

Kabaca, T. (2006). Limit kavramının öğretiminde bilgisayar cebiri sistemlerinin etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Kula, S., & Güzel, E. B. (2015). Reflections of Mathematics Student Teachers' Knowledge Related to the Purposes of the Curriculum on Their Limit Teaching. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science/Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 8(1).

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.

Memnun, D. S., & Altun, M. (2012). Rbc+ c modeline göre doğrunun denklemi kavramının soyutlanması üzerine bir çalışma: özel bir durum çalışması. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 1(1).

Memnun, D. S., Aydin, B., Özbilen, Ö., & Erdogan, G. (2017). The Abstraction Process of Limit Knowledge. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(2), 345.

Noss, R. (2002). Mathematical epistemologies at work. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 2-13.

Novak, J. D. (1993). How Do We Learn Our Lesson?. Science Teacher, 60(3), 50-55.

Ozmantar, M. F. (2004). Scaffolding, abstraction and emergent goals. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 24(2), 83-89.

Ozmantar, M. F., & Monaghan, J. (2007). A dialectical approach to the formation of mathematical abstractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 89- 112.

Paul White & Michael C. Mitchelmore (2010) Teaching for Abstraction: A Model, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12:3, 205-226, DOI: 10.1080/10986061003717476/

Piaget, J. (2000). Studies in reflecting abstraction (R. L. Campbell, Trans.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Przenioslo, M. (2004). Images of the limit of function formed in the course of mathematical studies at the university. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1- 3), 103-132.

Quesada, A., Einsporn, R. L., & Wiggins, M. (2008). The Impact of the Graphical Approach on Students' Understanding of the Formal Definition of Limit. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 15(3).

Roh, H. K. (2007). An Activity for Development of the Understanding of the Concept of Limit. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 105-112).

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational studies in mathematics, 22(1), 1-36.

Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification – the case of function. In E. Dubinsky, & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, MAA Notes No. 25. (pp. 54– 84). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

Sierpińska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 371-397.

Soylu, Y., & Aydın, S. (2006). A study on importance of the conceptual and operational knowledge are balanced in mathematics lessons. Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 83-95.

Swinyard, C. A., & Lockwood, E. (2007). Research on students’ reasoning about the formal definition of limit: An evolving conceptual analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (CRUME2007).

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational studies in mathematics, 12(2), 151-169.

Tangül, K., Barak, B., & Özdaş, A. (2015). Students’ concept definitions and concept images about limit Concept. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 5(1), 88-114.

URL-1. http://biography.yourdictionary.com/augustin-louis-cauchy.

URL-2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Weierstrass.

White, P., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2010). Teaching for abstraction: A model. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(3), 205-226.

Yeşildere, S., & Türnüklü, E. B. (2008). İlköğretim sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin bilgi oluşturma süreçlerinin matematiksel güçlerine göre incelenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2).

Yin, R. (2003). K.(2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc, 5, 11.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2085

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Mustafa Çağrı Gürbüz, Murat Ağsu, M. Emin Özdemir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).