Lincolyn Moyo


Formative assessment is vital to the learning process, because it promotes valued thinking tactics, skills and strategies. In most African schools today, the most visible assessment is summative. Yet research indicates that, teachers who use formative assessment approaches and techniques are better prepared to meet diverse students’ individual learning needs. Through qualitative research, paradigm approaches of observing trainee teachers on teaching practice, and reviewing written documents on assessment, the researcher observed that the use of scientific formative assessment approaches are a challenge. Data analysis found out six major barriers to wider practice of formative assessment. The most common challenge being found to be lack of scientific diagnostic assessment procedures like use of anecdotal notes and observation checklist to provide detailed and accurate assessment information instead of “Thingumbobing” or “Casting lots”. Data synthesis led to conclusions suggesting that reviewed formative assessment challenges are a result of three major causes: lack of rigorous emphasis, psychological training on assessment before teaching practice, negative attitudes by trainee teachers on detailed assessment procedures and, lack of motivation, seeing justification to carry out proper assessment procedures. In consideration of the above findings, the research recommended improved emphasis on scientific assessment procedures in teacher training programmes, mandatory policy requiring assessment record keeping during teaching practice and improvement of teacher working conditions.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



thingumbobing, casting lots, formative assessment, teaching practice

Full Text:



Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Barrow, K., Boyle, H., Ginsburg, M., Leu, E., Pier, D., Price-Rom, R. and Rocha, V. (2006). Cross-national synthesis of educational quality report No, 2: Professional Development and Teachers’ Conceptions of Educational Quality. Washington, D.C: USAID/Education Quality Improvement Project 1.

Bennet, R. E. (2009). A critical look at the meaning and basis of formative assessment. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

Bishop, G. (1989). Alternative strategies for education. MacMillan Publishers: London.

Bishop, R. and Glynn, T. (1999). Culture counts: Changing power relations in education. Dunmore Press: Palmerston North.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). “Assessment and classroom planning, Assessment in education: Principles policy and practice”. CARFAX Oxfordshire, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7-74.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshal, B. and Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Open University Press: London.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). “The search for methods of instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring”. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-17.

Boyle, B. and Charles, M. (2014). Formative assessment for teaching and learning. Sage: Los Angeles.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE: London.

Brookhart, S. M. (2007). “Classroom assessment: Tension and intersections in theory and practice”. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 429-458.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

Buari, N. A. (2011). “Teacher education challenges and prospects in innovation in Nigeria educational system”. Knowledge Review Volume 22 No 2, April, 2011.

Burke, K. (2005). How to assess authentic learning, (4th Ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press/Sage.

Burke, K. (2006). From standards to rubrics in six steps: Tools for assessing student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press SAGE.

Burke, K. (2008). What do we do with the kid who…Developing cooperation, self-discipline and responsibilities in the classroom, (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press/SAGE.

Butter, D. L. and Winne, P. H. (1995). “Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis”. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 245-281.

Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in action: Weaving the elements together. Hodder Arnold: Birmingham.

Colle, M. (2007). Marxism and educational theory: Origins and issues. Oxford: Routledge.

Corno, L. and Aderman, E. M. (2016). Handbook of educational psychology, (3rd Ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group: New York.

Costa, A. L. and Kallick, B. (2004). Assessment Strategies for self-directed learning. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.

Cowie, B. and Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 6(1), 32-42.

Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn to be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1994). “Promoting self-determined education”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(1). 3-14.

Dweek, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Esterberg, K. K. (2002). Qualitative methods in school research. McGraw-Hill Higher Education: Boston.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The Theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment and learning. Sage Publications Ltd: Oxford.

Ginsburg, M. (2006). Challenges to promoting active-learning, student-centred pedagogies. USAID/American Institutes for Research under the EQUIPILWA.

Gray, D. E. (2010). Doing research in the real world (2nd Ed.). Sage: London.

Guskey, T. R. (2008). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.

Guskey, T. R. (2010). Formative assessment: The contributions of Benjamin. S. Bloom. In H. L. Andrade and G. J. Gzik (Eds.). Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 66-124). New York: Taylor and Francis.

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. and Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hidi, S. and Haracklewicz, J. M. (2000). “Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century”. Review of Educational Research, 70 (2), 151-179.

Jones, A. C. (2005). Assessment for learning. Skills Development Agency: London.

Jones, L. (2007). The student-centred classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Kahl, S. (2005). “Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose”. Education Week, 25 (September (4), 11.

Keefe, J. W. K. and Jenkins, J. M. (2003). Personalised instruction in education. McGraw-Hill: Dushkin Connecticut.

Leu, E. and Price-Rom, A. (2006). Quality of education and teacher learning: A review of literature. Washington, D.C.: USIAD Educational Quality Improvement Project 1.

Looney, J. (Ed.). (2005). “Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms”. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., and McTigue, J. (1993). Assessing learner outcomes. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Merriam, S. (2007). Qualitative research and case study: Application in education, revised and expanded from case study. Research in Education: London.

Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachden, D. and Faraday, S. (2008). Independent learning: Literature review. Development for Children, Schools and Families Research Report: London.

Musial, D., Nieminen, G., Thomas, J. and Burke, K. (2009). Foundations of meaningful educational assessment. McGraw-Hill Higher Education: New York.

Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Human being. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

Paul, J. (2004). Introduction to the philosophies of research and criticism in education and the social sciences. Prentice Hall: London.

Randall, C. (2007). Philosophy of education: An anthology. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.

Robin, A. (2000). Culture and pedagogy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schunk, D. H. (1996). “Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning”. American Educational Research Journal, 33 pp. 359-382.

Shepard, L. A., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Rust, F., Snowden, J. B. and Gordon, E. (2005). Assessment in L, Darling-Hammond and J, Bransford (Eds.). Preparing teachers for a changing world. What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 275-326). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Simmons, H. (2002). School self-evaluation in a democracy. School-Based Education in D, Nevo (Ed.). School-based Evaluation: An International Perspective. Jai Press Oxford, pp. 17-34.

Stiggins, R. (2004). “New assessment beliefs for a new school mission”. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22-27.

Stiggins, R. J. (1999). “Assessment, student confidence and school success”. Phi Delta Kappa. November, pp. 19-198.

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Learner-involved assessment for learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

Thakrar, J., Zinn, D., and Wolfenden, F. (2009). Harnessing open educational resources to the challenges of teacher education in sub-Saharan Africa. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 10, No, 4-p. 1-15.

UNESCO (2000-2016). Global Monitoring Reports: Education for All-The Quality Imperative. Paris: UNESCO.

Wexler, P. (2008). Social theory in education. Primer: Peter Lang.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Education assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Woolman, D. C. (2001). “Educational reconstruction and post-colonial curriculum development: A comparative study of four African countries”. International Education Journal, Vol 2, No 5. http://www.flinders.edu.au/education/iej. Retrieved 06 September 2016.

Woolfolk, A. and Margetts, K. (2013). Functions of formative assessment. Educational Psychology: Pearson Frenchs Forest.

Wragg, E. C. and Brown, G. (2001). Questioning in the secondary school. Routledge Falmer: London.

Yero, J. L. (2002). The meaning of education. Teachers’ mind resources: http://www.teachersmind.com, Retrieved 22 May 2013.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1737


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Lincolyn Moyo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015-2023. European Journal of Education Studies (ISSN 2501 - 1111) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).