Ronald Rutto Ngeiyo, John Ayieko Aseta


The unresolved land issue in Chepyuk ward for decades had adversely affected farming competitiveness in spite of the region being fertile and viable for competitive farm production. Lack of security of tenure on the untitled land had a direct bearing on investment (farm inputs) and therefore to a large extends affected farm output. Despite many researches that had been undertaken on Chepyuk land issue, land and conflict had been widely studied rather than farming competitiveness. The studies on farming competitiveness in Chepyuk ward remains scanty and therefore justify more research on the aspect of farming competitiveness. The main objective of this study was to establish the effect of land ownership documentation on farming competitiveness in Chepyuk Ward of Bungoma County. A descriptive survey research design was used in this study. The study was guided by theory of land ownership in a free society advanced by Ingalls (2012). The target population was 3120, households, 10 land officers and 10 agricultural officers located at the county level. Multistage sampling technique was used in this study where Simple random sampling was employed when selecting 312 respondents among the households. Five Land officers and Five Agricultural officers were respectively and purposefully sampled for this study. The researcher used questionnaires, interviews and document analysis as the main tools for collecting data. The data from the questionnaires, interviews and document analysis was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The researcher used frequencies and percentages in summarizing data. Information obtained through interviews was discussed to support or dispute the findings from the questionnaires. Tables were used to present the data for purposes of interpretation. The study informs Ministry of lands on the existing gaps in the fight against irregular allocation of land. The study also enables land policy experts in the government review existing mechanisms and systems set to support the Chepyuk area residents in dealing with cases that bring about land conflicts in the area and entire nation. Residents were in agreement that the land lacked mapping, surveying and land registration and this triggered frequent conflicts. Cultural norms of the community also denied women land ownership rights. The Land officers and Agricultural officers gave similar opinion. Lack of land documentation denied people opportunity to seriously venture into farming with sole aim of attaining food security and profit negatively affecting livelihood of the residents. The government should reposes illegally acquired plots and re-issue to the rightful owners, it should also process land titles for the scheme. The community should also be sensitized to embrace gender equity on land allocations. This will enable residents to actively engage in farming activities hence enhance farming competitiveness in Chepyuk ward.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


land ownership documentation, competitiveness

Full Text:



Dale P. and McLaughlin J. (1999). Ownership, Value and use when implementing land management policies. Land Administration system manual RNRA, Oxford press.

Haugerud A. (1989). Land Tenure and Agrarian Change in Kenya. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 59: 61-90

Mwenda J. N. (2003, March). In Country Report Kenya. Paper presented at the FIG Commission. 7th Annual Meeting, Krakow, Poland.

Odhiambo W. & Nyangito H. (2002). Land Laws and Land Use in Kenya: KHRC Resources.

Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O. (1991). Tenants of the Crown: evolution of agrarian law and Institutions in Kenya: ACTS Press.

Republic of Kenya (2006). Draft National Land Policy. National Land Policy Secretariat. Mud Springs Geographers Inc. Ministry of lands, Nairobi.

Republic of Kenya (2009). Sessional Paper No. 3 of 2009 on National Land Policy. Nairobi, Kenya: Government Printer, Nairobi Kenya.

Siriba D. N. & Mwenda J. N. (2013). Towards Kenya’s profile of Land Administration Domain Model, Kenya.

Siriba D. N., Voss, W., & Mulaku, G. C. (2011). The Kenyan Cadastre and Modern Land Administration. Zeitschrift fur Vermessungswesen, 136(3), 177-186.

Wachira G. M. (2008). Vindicating Indigenous People's Land Rights in Kenya. University of Pretoria. Pretoria, South Africa.

Williamson I., Enemark, S., Wallace J., & Rajabifard A. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. Redlands, California: ESRI Press Academic.


Copyright (c) 2020 Ronald Rutto Ngeiyo, John Ayieko Aseta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015 - 2018. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


Hit counter