ANALYSIS OF THE SATISFACTION OF HOUSEHOLD USERS OF THE IMPROVED COOKING STOVE AND LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS IN KINSHASA, CONGO / ANALYSE DE LA SATISFACTION DES MENAGES UTILISATEURS DU FOYER AMELIORE ET DU GAZ DU PETROLE LIQUEFIE A KINSHASA
Abstract
This study analyses the satisfaction of 148 and 47 households who respectively adopted the improved cooking stove and the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in 2020 out of a sample of 1154 households. It sought to identify the critical parameters on which to focus for the continued use of the improved cooking stove and the LPG for cooking. The data was collected via a survey to evaluate the level of satisfaction of households surveyed using the improved cooking stove or the LPG. It emerges from this study that the households using the improved cooking stove are satisfied with this stove, especially the imported brands or those produced by the specialized structures. On the other hand, stoves made by local craftsmen are less appreciated. For liquefied petroleum gas, its price and the difficulties in obtaining it constitute the elements of the dissatisfaction of user households. The Congolese government should make it easier for local craftsmen who are increasingly embarking on the manufacture of improved cooking stoves, on the one hand, and subsidize the price of gas to make it more accessible to most Congolese households who are poor.
La présente étude analyse la satisfaction de 148 et 47 ménages qui ont adopté respectivement le foyer amélioré et le gaz de pétrole liquéfié en 2020 sur un échantillon de 1154 ménages. Elle a cherché à identifier les paramètres critiques sur lesquels il faut se focaliser pour utilisation continue du foyer amélioré et du GPL pour la cuisson. Les données ont été collectées via une enquête sur le niveau de satisfaction de l’utilisation du foyer et/ou du GPL par les ménages enquêtés. Il ressort de cette étude que les ménages utilisateurs du foyer amélioré en sont satisfaits, surtout les marques importées ou celles produites par les structures spécialisées. Par contre, les foyers fabriqués par les artisans locaux sont moins appréciés. Pour le gaz de pétrole liquéfié, son prix et les difficultés pour s’en procurer constituent les éléments de l’insatisfaction des ménages utilisateurs. Le gouvernement congolais devrait accorder plus de facilité aux artisans locaux qui se lancent de plus en plus dans la fabrication des foyers améliorés, d’une part ; et de subventionner le prix du gaz pour le rendre plus accessible à la majorité des ménages congolais qui sont pauvres.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, I.E. et Seaman, C.A. 2007. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64-65.
Alwin D.F. et Krosnick J.A., 1991. The Reliability of Survey Attitude Measurement: The Influence of Question and Respondent Attributes, Sociological Methods Research, vol. 20, no 1, pp. 139-181
Armendariz, A.C., Edwards, R., Johnson, M., Zuk, M., Serrano, P., Rojas Bracho, L., Riojas-Rodriguez, H., Masera, M., 2008. Reduction in particulate and carbon-monoxide levels associated with the introduction of a Patsari improved cook stove in rural Mexico. Indoor Air. 18, pp. 93–105.
Asante K.P., Afari-Asiedu S., Abdulai M.A., Dalaba M.A., Carrión D., Dickinson K.L., Abeka A.N., Sarpong K. et Jack D.W., 2018. Ghana's rural liquefied petroleum gas program scale up: A case study. Energy for Sustainable Development 46: pp. 94 -102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010 Accédé le 25 novembre 2022.
Banque Mondiale, 2011. Household cookstoves, environment, health, and climate change: A new look at an old problem, World Bank.
Barnes, D.F, Openshaw, F.K., Smith, K. and Robert, R. (1994). What makes people cook with improved biomass stoves? A comparative international review of stove programs. World Bank Technical Paper, Energy Series, no. 242.
Belani Masamba J., Mpanzu Balomba P. et Kinkela Savy C. 2023. Adoption du foyer amélioré et du gaz de pétrole liquéfié à Kinshasa: Déterminants et impact sur la déforestation. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques. (Article soumis pour publication)
FAO, 2017. The charcoal transition: greening the charcoal value chain to mitigate climate change and improve local livelihoods, by J. van Dam. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gallagher M., Beard M., Clifford M.J. and Craig Watson M., 2016. An evaluation of a biomass stove safety protocol used for testing household cookstoves, in low and middle-income countries. Energy for Sustainable Development 33 (2016) 14–25.
Gizachew, B. et Tolerab, M., 2018, Adoption and kitchen performance test of improved cook stove in the Bale Eco-Region of Ethiopia. Energy for Sustainable Development, 45, 186-189.
Goldemberg J., 2000. World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability. United Nations Publications.
Karimu A., Mensha J.T. et Adu G. 2016. Who Adopts LPG as the Main Cooking Fuel and Why? Empirical Evidence on Ghana Based on National Survey. World Development Vol. 85, pp. 43–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.004. Accédé le 26 octobre 2022.
Keraro M. M. 2014. Impact Of Improved Cook Stove Utilization Project: The Case for Hifadi Hiproject, In Embu County. Master thesis. University of Nairobi. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/74762. Accédé le 25 octobre 2022.
Manibog F. R., 1984. Improved Cooking Stoves in Developing Countries: Problems and Opportunities. Ann. Rev. Energy 1984. 9: 199-227
Ministère de l’Energie, 2009. Document de politique du secteur de l’énergie de la RDC. 105 p.
Murphy, J.T., 2001. Making the energy transition in rural East Africa: is leapfrogging an alternative? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68, 173–193.
Overdijk, M., Van Diggelen, W., 2006. Technology Appropriation in Face-to-face Collaborative Learning. In: Tomadaki, E., Scott, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, vol. 8, 2007, pp. 566–568.
Pareek, U. et Chattopadhyay, S. N. 1966. Adoption quotient: a measure of multipractice adoption behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2 (1), 95–108.
PNUD et OMS. 2009. The Energy Access Situation in Developing Countries: A Review Focusing on the Least Developed Countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York. 142 p.
Pope, D., Bruce, N., Higgerson, J., Hyseni, L., Stanistreet, D., Mbatchou, B. & Puzzolo, E., 2018, EcoHealth, 15, 729-743. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9
RDC, 2013. Rapport national « Energie durable pour tous à l'horizon 2030 ». Programme National et Stratégie. 82 p.
RDC, 2015. Stratégie-cadre nationale REDD de la République Démocratique du Congo, version 3. 142 p.
Roden C.A., Bond T.C., Conway S., Pinel A.B.O., MacCarty N., Still D. 2009. Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves, Atmos. Environ. 43 (6), pp.1170-1181
Schure, J., 2014. Woodfuel for Urban Markets in the Congo Basin: A Livelihood Perspective, Thesis, Wageningen University. 199 p.
Tebugulwa, A., 2015. Understanding Technology Adoption: The Case of Improved Cook Stoves in Bunga, Central Uganda. Master Thesis, Lund University. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=7762708&fileOId=7868525. Accédé le 21/09/2022.
Urmee, T. and Gyamfi, S. 2014. A review of improved Cookstove technologies and programs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 33, pp. 625-635.
Van Beukeringa, P., Kahyararab, G., Masseya, E., Di Primaa, S., Hessa, S., Makundib, V., Van der Leeuwa, K., 2007. Optimization of the charcoal chain in Tanzania, Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management (PREM), Working paper 07-03.
Van Leeuwen R., Evans A., Hyseni B., 2017. Increasing the Use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Cooking in Developing Countries; http://www.worldbank.org/energy/livewire, accédé le 11 novembre 2019. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/17044590.pdf. Accédé le 12 novembre 2021.
Yatnalli C. S., Huggi B. H. et Hiremath D. V., 2021. A Study on Consumer Awareness and Satisfaction Towards LPG In Hirekerur Taluk (Karnataka). in Paripex-Indian Journal of Research.
Yonemitsu A., Njenga M., Iiyama M, Matsushita S., 2015. A choice experiment study on fuel preference of Kibera slum households in Kenya. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6;(3):196-200.
Zulu, L. C. et Richardson, R. B., 2013. Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17 (2), 127-137.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v9i2.1578
Copyright (c) 2023 Justin Belani Masamba, Patience Mpanzu Balomba, Charles Kinkela Savy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
