Michael Vitoulis


The purpose of this study was to investigate early childhood educators’ perceptions, attitudes and intentions towards the exploitation of principles of connectivism concerning their professional training. The sample of this study was 744 early childhood educators, both educators with gradual professional experience, as well as prospective educators (students). This study was conducted with survey methods and the data were collected by using a questionnaire, developed by the researcher, which was based on the theory of connectivism and was created for the purposes of this study only. At the end of the study was noted that there are generally positive attitudes and intentions, regarding connectivism, that coexist with a relative hesitation. Results indicated that significant differences do exist between early childhood educators and senior students regarding their New Technologies usage profile and work experience. The necessity for training early childhood educators was highlighted, so as they will be able to explore and exploit the potential of participatory web 2.0 to lifelong learning and professional development. Implications for further research were discussed.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



early childhood, education, educators, attitudes, digital pedagogy, connectivism, lifelong professional training


Bell, F. (2010). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98–118.

Churches, A. (2008). Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy. Edorigami Wikispaces.

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. (5th ed.) New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.

Croxall, B. & Koh, A. (2013). Digital Pedagogy?, A Digital Pedagogy Unconference. Retrieved from

Downes, S. (2007). What Connectivism is. Half an Hour. Retrieved from

Downes, S. (2009). Learning networks and connective knowledge. In: Yang, H.H. and Yuen, S.C. eds. Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: implications of web-based communities and networking. New York: Information Science Reference, pp. 1-26.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. Online,

Downes, St. (2005). An Introduction to Connective Knowledge. Retrieved from

Dunaway, M.K. (2011). Connectivism: learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675-685.

Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136.

Ference, M., and Trigwell, K. (2000). “Variatio Est Mater Studiorum.” Higher Education Research & Development, 19: 381–395.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2000). “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” Internet and Higher Education, 2: 87–105.

Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., and McConnell, D. (2004). Research On Networked Learning: An Overview. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Book Series Volume 4: Advances in Research on Networked Learning, edited by P. Dillenbourg, 1–10. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Howell, J. D. (2012). Teaching with ICT: Digital pedagogies for collaboration and creativity, Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson R.T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Kivunja, Ch. (2013). Embedding Digital Pedagogy in Pre-Service Higher Education To Better Prepare Teachers for the Digital Generation. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 131-142.

Kop, R. (2011). “The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12: 19–38.

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology, 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.

Mallon, M. (2012). The new distance learners: providing customised online research assistance to urban students on the go. Urban Library Journal, 18(1).

McBride, M.F. (2012). Reconsidering information literacy in the 21st century: the redesign of an information literacy class. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 287-300.

Milligan, C. Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 149-159.

NAEYC (2017) Standards for Early Childhood Professional Preparation | National Association for the Education of Young Children | NAEYC CAEP| Baccalaureate and Graduate Degree Programs. (n.d.). Retrieved from

Nikolopoulou, Kl. and Gialamas, V. (2013). Barriers to the Integration of Computers in Early Childhood Settings: Teachers’ Perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 285–301.

Peschl, M.F. (2010). Knowledge Construction and Knowledge Creation as Key Factors in Educational and Innovation Processes. Retrieved from .

Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 97–118. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Shelly, G., B., Gunter, G.A., and Gunter R., E. (2010). Teachers Discovering Computers: Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-8.

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., and Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Historical Perspective. In Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by K. Sawyer, 409–426. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Stommel, J. (2014). What is Digital Pedagogy? , Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from

Thota, N. (2015). Connectivism and the Use of Technology/Media in Collaborative Teaching and Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, n.142.

Transue, B.M. (2013). Connectivism and information literacy: moving from learning theory to pedagogical practice. Public Services Quarterly, 9(3), 185-195.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Functions, 2nd ed., edited by Mary Gauvain and Michael Cole. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Vitoulis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


Hit counter