Benson Kairichi Marimba


Globally, corruption poses a major challenge because it is at the heart of all other crimes, serious or petty. Kenya’s commitment in the fight against corruption has severely been tested. In spite of many laws to address the scourge of corruption, the perception ratings have persistently remained high. While there is corruption in every sector, and in every nation as the Perception Corruption Indices indicates, land related corruption appear to have been given little focus by the media. We have a number of counties in Kenya where land adjudication has never been finalized since 1963 when the country attained independence. The reasons for this slow pace are probably a direct consequence of corruption. A review of literature on land related corruption indicates a paucity of studies on this sector in the country. However, there are many studies on corruption generally around the world. This desktop study set out to establish the types of land related corruption is covered by the media around the world. Findings indicate that the governance challenges in land administration are the same even though their magnitudes vary. The typology includes bribes for various services; malpractices extend to preparing parallel titles for registered and unregistered parcels and title issued outside the Government system among others. Other areas prone to corruption are transfer of property, valuations, buying and selling land, land registration, mutation, Surveying and land revenue officers. Land use planning divisions are amongst the very corrupt institutions. This study supports Borner, Brunetti, and Weder (1995) in calling for the restoration of watchdog journalism who argue that watchdog reporting is “potentially a highly effective mechanism of external control” against corruption. Secondly, given the power of the media to influence opinion, unless salience of land corruption is elevated, the public will not pick it as an issue for debate or least of all a matter of concern for policy makers to address. The study will make policy suggestions on how to deal with corruption in the land sector in Kenya by borrowing from those countries that have attempted 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



corruption, land governance, land reforms, media as a watchdog


Andreas, R, Schuck, A., & De Vreese, C. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 2006; 21(1), 5-32

Ardèvol-Abreu (2015). Framing theory in communication research. Origins, development and current situation in Spain A Ardèvol-Abreu [CV] [ORCID] [GS] Universität Wien (Austria). Retrieved on 5 May 2017

Ayittey, N. (1992). Africa betrayed. New York: Transnational Publishers.

Ayittey, N. (1998). Africa in chaos. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Brankov, T. & Tanjević, N (2013). Corruption in the land sector. Economics of Agriculture 2/2013 UDC: 343.352:332.3 – Retrieved on 22 June 2017

Calderisi, R. (2006). The trouble with Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-26.

Chyi, H., & McCombs, M. (2004). Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbian school shootings. J & MC Quarterly, 81, (1), 22-35.

Cohen, B. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81 (1), 22-35.

Chang Sup Park, (2012). How the media frame political corruption: Episodic and thematic frame stories found in Illinois newspapers. Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Retrieved on 20 Nov 2016

Davidson, A., & Wallack, L. (2004). A content analysis of STDs in the print news media. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 111-117.

De Vreese, H. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, (1), 36-52.

Dimitrova, D & Stromback, J. (2008). Foreign policy and the framing of the 2003 Iraq war in elite Swedish & US newspapers. SAGE Journals Online, 1(2), 203-220.

Dominick, J. (1994). The dynamics of mass communication. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Dominick, J. (2002). The dynamics of mass communication: Media in the digital age. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Donovan, J. & Jalleh, G. (2000). Positive versus framing of a hypothetical infant immunization: The influence of involvement. Sage Journals. Retrieved November 19, 2007 from:, 82 95.

Druckman, J. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behaviour, 23,(.3), September 2001, Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Ebiede, T (2011). Conflict Drivers: Environmental Degradation and Corruption in the Niger Delta Region: African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring 2011), pp. 139-151 Published by: Indiana University Press Stable URL: Accessed: 13-06-2017 15:10 UTC

Elizabeth Harrison, (2007). Corruption. Development in Practice, Vol. 17, No. 4/5 (Aug., 2007), pp. 672-678. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of Oxfam GB Stable URL: Accessed: 01-11-2016 07:47 UTC

Entman, R. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communications, 51-58.

Eoff, E. (2002). What is Agenda Setting? Retrieved November 19, 2007 from:

Esser, F., & D’angelo, P. (2003). Framing the press and publicity process: A content analysis of meta-coverage in campaign 2000 network news. SAGE Publications. American Behavioural Scientist, 46. ( 5), 617-641.

Fadairo, O., Fadairo A. and Aminu, O. (2014). Coverage of Corruption News by Major Newspapers in Nigeria. New Media and Mass Communication ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)Vol.24, 2014- Retrieved on 20 Nov 2016

Fairhurst, G. (2005). Reframing the art of framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. London: SAGE Publications. 1(12), 165-185. USA: University of Cincinnati.

Ferguson, S. (1999). Communication planning: An integrated approach. Canada: Newbury Park, Sage Publications.

Fernandez, J. (2004). Corporate communications: A 21st century primer. New Delhi: Response Books, Sage Publications.

Gan, F., Teo J, & Detenber, H. (2005). Framing the battle for the white house: Acomparison of two national newspapers’ coverage of the 2000 United States presidential election. London: The International Journal for Communications, 67(5), 441-467

Garson, D. (2006). Agenda setting theory. //E:/Agenda Setting Theory.htm.: Retrieved November 14, 2016

Goffman, E. (1974). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49 (4), 103-22.

Fairhurst, G. (2005). Reframing the art of framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. London: SAGE Publications. 1(12), 165-185. USA: University of Cincinnati.

Goffman, E. (1974). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49 (4), 103-22.

Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205-242.

Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205-242.

Hanlon, J. (2002). Towards a new political economy of development: Are donors to Mozambique promoting corruption? Towards a New Political Economy of Development, Conference, Sheffield, UK.

Hansen, A., Cottle, S., Negrine, R., & Newbold, C. (2004). Mass communication research methods. London: Macmillan Press.

Hwang, H., Botlieb. M., Nah, S., & Mclead, D. (2007). Applying a cognitive-processing model to presidential debate effects: Post debate news analysis and primed reflection. Journal of Communication, 57 (2007) 40-59. Retrieved on 4 May 2017

Kalvas, F., Váně, J. Štípková, M, Kreidl, M (2017). Framing Theory. content/uploads/2011/09/Kalvas_Vane_Stipkova_Kreidl.doc/-Retrieved on 5 May 2017

Klitgaard, R, (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press (first published 1988)

Kosicki, G. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda setting research. Journal of Communications, 100-127.

Littlejohn S & Foss K, (2009). Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. SAGE Publications, California, USA

Littlejohn, W. (1983). Theories of human communication (2nd ed.). California: Wadsworth Publishing, Belmour: USA.

Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Luther, C., & Miller, M. (2005). Framing of the 2003 U.S–Iraq war demonstrations: An analysis of news and partisan texts. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82 (1), 78-96.

Marimba, K. (2010). Images of corruption as framed by Kenya’s two main dailies 2003-2008. Daystar University

McCombs, M. (2007). The agenda setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion, University of Texas.

McCombs, M., & Shaw, L. (1972). Agenda setting theory. Retrieved November 16, 2007 from:

McQuail, D. (2002). McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory. London: Sage Publications.

Miller, K. (2004). Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, & contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Miller, J. M. (2005). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Retrieved November 19, 2008 from: www.wfu.educ/~louden/politicalCommunication/Bibs/AGENDA.html

Matthes, J. (2009).What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990-2005. J & MC Quarterly, Summer 2009, .2(86), 349-369.

McCallum, K., & Blood, W. (2005). Leadership and abuse: news framing of the Iraqi war and terrorism during the 2004 Federal Election. School of Professional Communication, University of Canberra.

Molen P. and Tuladhar, A. (2006). Corruption and Land Administration Shaping the Change. XXIII FIG Congress, Netherlands

Naila Hamdy & Ehab H. Gomaa (2012). Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media. Journal of Communication ISSN 0021-9916. Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, The American University

Peters, B. (2003). The Media’s role: Covering or uncovering up corruption? Global Corruption Report, 44-56.

Richardson, J., & Lancendorfer, K. (2004). Framing affirmative action: The influence of race on newspaper editorial responses to the University of Michigan Cases.

Parker, E. (2001). Substantive and affective attributes on corporate merger: An examination of second level-agenda setting effects. AEJMC Conference Papers.

Park, C. (2012). How the Media Frame Political Corruption: Episodic and Thematic Frame Stories Found in Illinois Newspapers- Retrieved on 9 May 2017

Peng, Z. (2008). Framing the anti-war protests in the global village: A comparative study of newspapers coverage in three countries. International Communication Gazette, 70, 361.

Rajeev K. and Nelson, M. (2011). Government fragmentation versus fiscal decentralization and corruption Public Choice, Vol. 148, No. 3/4 (September 2011), pp. 471-490 Published by: Springer Stable URL: Accessed: 01-11-2016 07:28 UTC

Richardson, J., & Lancendorfer, K. (2004). Framing affirmative action: The influence of race on newspaper editorial responses to the University of Michigan Cases. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9, 74.

Stapenhurst, R. (2000). The media’s role in curbing corruption. Washington: International Bank of Reconstruction and Development.

Steenkamp, J. (2002). Making public corruption in South Africa: An analysis of media reports on corruption over the period 1 November 2000 - 31 December 2001

Stephenson, M, (2014). Thoughts on Kiltgaard’s Misleading ‘corruption formula’. Retrieved on 20 November 2016

Scheufele, A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49 (4), 103-122.

Scheufele, A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of communication, 57, 9-20.

Segvic, I. (2005). The framing of politics: A content analysis of three Croatian newspapers: London, The International Journal for Communication Studies, 67(5), 469-488.

Severin, W., & Tankard, J. Jr. (2001). Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

Shah, V., Mclead, M., & Lee, N. (2008. Framing policy debates: Issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues. Communication Research, 35, 395.

Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

Smith, M. (2007). Framing same-sex marriage in Canada and the United States: Goodridge, Halpern and the National Boundaries of Political Discourse. LA: SAGE Publications

Tanjong, E., & Gaddy, G. (1994). The agenda-setting function of the international mass media. African Media Review, 8(2), 1-14..

Taversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 2(11):453-8

Taversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions, in rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology, edited by R. Hogarthand M. Reder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987, 1-23.

Vliegenthart, R., & Roggeband, C. (2007). Framing immigration and integration: Relationships between press and parliament in the Netherlands. L A, International Communication Gazette, SAGE Journal, 69(3), 295-319.

Watson, J. (2003). Media communication: An introduction to theory and process, (2nd ed.) Retrieved November 6, 2008 from

Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142-147.

Wimmer, D., & Dominick, R. (2006) Mass media research. Belmont: Thomson Corporation, USA.

Wolf, S. (2007). Framing science: To Frame or not to frame.–or-not.html. Retrieved November 20, 2008.

World Bank (2000). Journal: helping combat corruption: progress at the World Bank since 1997. Washington: USA.


Copyright (c) 2018 Benson Kairichi Marimba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015 - 2018. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


Hit counter