THE STATUS OF THE TERRESTRIAL PLANT SPECIES AVAILABLE IN HAMISI SUB-COUNTY, VIHIGA COUNTY, KENYA

James Okinda, Dennis Mamboleo, Romborah Simiyu, Boniface Mulimi Nasilomwa

Abstract


Most of the earth’s ecosystems have been dramatically transformed through anthropogenic actions. Unfortunately, some of these transformations represent a loss of diversity rather than enriching it. Habitat loss due to large-scale conversion of land to agriculture and settlement, infrastructure establishment, the introduction of invasive species and overexploitation of biological resources are among the global key drivers of terrestrial plant species diversity loss all of which have their origin in human demands placed on the terrestrial ecosystems. In Vihiga County, Hamisi sub-county, the rate of terrestrial plant diversity decline has increased in the recent past due to human actions; however, little is known about the effects of anthropogenic activities on terrestrial plant species diversity. The purpose of this study was to examine the status of the terrestrial plant species available in Hamisi Sub County of Vihiga County. The study was based on the ecological period between 1985 and 2015. The mixed research method design was adopted and a sample size of 201 household heads was selected from a study population of 17095. The sub-county was stratified into two divisions purposively selected for the administration of questionnaires, then the target household heads population was selected through simple random sampling. Key informants such as KWS officers, local administrators, agricultural officers, environmental officers and CBO leaders were selected through purposive sampling. Primary data was obtained through direct field observation, photography, satellite images, questionnaire administration, interview of key informants and focus group discussion. Secondary data was obtained from documented material; textbooks, journals, magazines, published and unpublished government reports and websites. Data from questionnaires were analyzed descriptively (frequencies with their percentages, means and standard deviation) using SPSS and presented in form of tables, charts and graphs and discussion essays. The other quantitative data analysis was performed using ArcGIS Desktop tools and presented as satellite images, GIS plates and photographs. Qualitative data was analyzed from emerging themes. The study findings revealed that: The terrestrial plant species had declined to a large extent while others disappeared completely. This information was expected to be used by decision-makers to ensure a high percentage of terrestrial plant species diversity is restored for human well-being.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


terrestrial plant species; earth’s ecosystems; Hamisi Sub-County

Full Text:

PDF

References


Althof, J. A. (2005). Human Impact on Flora and Vegetation of Kakamega Forest, Kenya; Structure, Distribution and Disturbances of Plant Communities in an East African Rainforest. Bochum: Arnchild Johanna Althof.

Bendall, R. (1996). Biodiversity; The Follow-up to Rio. Washington DC: Cambridge University Press.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2006). Global Biodiversity Outlook 2 Assessment Report. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2006b). Biodiversity in Development; Biodiversity Brief 8. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2009). Biodiversity, Development and Poverty Alleviation; Recognizing the Role of Biodiversity for Human Well-being. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Biodiversity and Sustainable Development. Montreal Quebec: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Biodiversity is Our Life; Gicana 7 Report. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2ndEd.,). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2009). Forest and the Global Economy. United Nations; Rome: FAO.

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010; FAO Forestry Pp. 163. Rome Italy: FAO.

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2015). Global Forest Assessment 2015. How are the Worlds' Forest Changing? 1990-2015; Twenty-five years in review. Rome: FAO UN Press.

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2005). Global Forest Resources Assessment Update 2OO5, Terms and Definitions; Working Pp.83. Rome, Italy: FAO

Government of Kenya. (2010). National Environment Action Plan (NEAP) 2009-2013; Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Hamisi Sub-county Agriculture Office Report. (2015). Hamisi Sub-county Profile and Progress Report. Hamisi: Hamisi Sub-county.

Hawthorne, W. D., Marshall, C. A. M., Abu, M. and Agyeman, V. K. (2011). The impact of Logging Damage on Tropical Rainforest, their Recovery and Regeneration. Oxford, South Park Road: Oxford Forestry Institute.

Hayashi Jr., P., Abib, G., and Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in Qualitative Research: Approcessual Approach. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 24 pp. 98 - 112

Heywood, V. H. and Watson R. T. (2003). Global Biodiversity Assessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hungarian State of the Art Report. (2000). The Effects of Linear Infrastructure on Habitat Fragmentation; Hungarian State of the Art Report. Hungary: Budapest.

Isaac & Michael (1995). A Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego: C.A. Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2006). 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union.

International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2010). Plants Under Pressure; A Global Assessment. The First Report of the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for Plants. Royal Botanic Gardens London: The World Conservation Union.

Kirk, J., and Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kothari C. R. (2004). Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques, 2nd Revised edition. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

Kuper, W., Sommer, J. H. and Lovett, J. C. (2004). Africa s' Hotspots of Biodiversity Redefined. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91 (4), 525-535.

Lowman, D. M. and Moffett, M. (1993). Tropical Rainforest Canopy Development. Sarasota: Botanica Gardens.

Mahiri, I. and Howorth, C. (2001). Twenty Years of Resolving the Irresolvable; Approaches to the Fuel Wood Problem in Kenya. Land Degradation and Development (12), 205-215.

Ministry of Devolution and Planning. (2013). Vihiga County Development Profile. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Ministry of Devolution and Planning. (2014). First Vihiga County Integrated Development Plan. Nairobi: Government Printers.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. (2005a). Ecosystem and Human Well-being; Biodiversity Synthesis Report. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. (2005b). Ecosystem and Human Well-being; Wetlands and Water Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, D.C.: World Resource Institute Island Press.

Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife. (2013). Analysis of Drivers and Underlying Causes of Forest Cover Change in the Various Forest Types of Kenya; Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife. Nairobi; Kenya: Government Printers.

Morris, R. J. (2010). Review of Anthropogenic Impact on Tropical Forest Biodiversity; A Network Structure and Ecosystem Functioning Perspective. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

Mutavi, I. N. (2012). Assessment of the Effects of Anthropogenic Activity on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation in Matayos Division Busia County; Kenya. Maseno: Maseno University.

Mutiso, F., Hitiman, J., Kiyapi, J. and Eboh, E. (2013). Recovery of Kakamega Tropical Rainforest from Anthropogenic Disturbances. Tropical Forest Science 25 (4), 566-576.

Mutiso, F. M., Mugo, M. J., Cheboiwo, J., Sang, F. and Tarus, G. K. (2015). Floristic Composition, Affinities and Plant Formation in Tropical Forest; A Case Study of Mau Forest in Kenya. International of Agriculture and Forestry 2015(2), 79-91.

Ozturk, M., Celik, A., Yarci, C., Aksoy, A. and Feoli, E. (2002). An Overview of Plant Diversity Landuse and Degradation in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Environmental Management and Health Vol. 13 No. 5., 442-449.

Rodney & Keenan. (2015). Dynamics of Global Forest Area. Forest Ecology and Management; Science to Sustain the Worlds' Forest; Changes in Global Forest Resources from 1990-2015 Vol. 352, 9-20.

Tschakert, P., Zimmerer, K., King, B., Baum, S. and Chongming, W. (2014). A Case Study of Amazon Rainforest. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

United Nations Environmental Programme. (2009a). Kenya; Atlas of Our Changing Environment. Nairobi: UNEP.

United Nations Environmental Programme. (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment Report; Press Release. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

United Nations Environmental Programme. (2007). Global Biodiversity Assessment Report. Washington DC: Cambridge University Press.

United Nations Environmental Programme. (2011). Emerging Perspective on Forest Diversity. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

Wawire, M. E. (2007). The Impact of Anthropogenic Activities on Plant Species in Kakamega Forest, Shinyulu Division Kenya. Maseno University: Maseno.

Yamane, Taro. (1967): Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v8i1.1344

Copyright (c) 2022 James Okinda, Dennis Mamboleo, Romborah Simiyu, Boniface Mulimi Nasilomwa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


 

Hit counter