THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION: EVIDENCE FROM THE PREFERENCE FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION SYSTEM IN SIERRA LEONE

Saa Emerson Lamina, Robert Daud Korsu

Abstract


Ethnicity has been considered a factor that undermines political reforms in Africa, as well as the acceptance or preference for political reforms initiated by a ruling party, despite the need for democratic consolidation, which is a public good, in many cases. The study therefore investigates whether the preference for democratic consolidation implemented through proportional representation, like the reform of 2022 in Sierra Leone, which was the adoption of proportional representation, with implementation in the 2023 election, is driven by ethnic considerations or not. A survey of respondents across all district headquarters towns was conducted, and both Pearson’s Chi-squared, with its associated Cramer’s V statistic and the Probit model of preference for proportional representation were employed. The results show that the preference for Sierra Leone’s proportional representation is strongly linked to ethnicity, suggesting ethnicity undermines democratic consolidation in Sierra Leone. Based on this result, that ethnicity undermines democratic consolidation in Sierra Leone, it is important that the Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone and the civic education institutions jointly strengthen efforts to explain in accessible languages how PR and the first-past-the-post translate votes into seats to ensure that the citizens do not evaluate electoral systems through their perceived consequences for their communities. It is also useful for Sierra Leone to employ policies that would encourage political parties to develop national instead of predominant ethnic support bases and strongly promote measures that build district or regional inclusive party platforms.

Keywords


ethnicity, democratic consolidation, proportional representation, Probit Model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayamba, I. A. et al, (2024). Conflict, elections and the politics of the winner-takes-all in Africa. International Journal of Geopolitics and Governance, 3(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.37284/ijgg.3.1.2541

Banducci, S. A., et al. (1999). Proportional Representation and attitudes about politics: Results from New Zealand. Electoral Studies, 18(4), 533-555. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00019-0

Bangura, Y. (2015). Development, democracy and cohesion: Critical essays with insights on Sierra Leone and wider Africa contexts. Osman Sankoh (Mallam O.). Retrieved from https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/development-democracy-and-cohesion

Bangura, Y. (2005). Racism and public policy. Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Racism_and_Public_Policy.html?id=oRe5AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

Boyle, J. (2024). The line. AI and the future of personhood. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/5859/The-LineAI-and-the-Future-of-Personhood

Bratton, M., & van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Democratic_Experiments_in_Africa.html?id=h-2nF6ls7B0C&redir_esc=y

Casey, T. (2008). The social content of economic change in Britain: Between Policy and performance. Manchester University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Social_Context_of_Economic_Change_in.html?id=duHv6Aw9gAUC&redir_esc=y

Cho, W. (2010). Citizens’ perceptions of government responsiveness in Africa. Do electoral systems and ethnic diversity matter? Comparative Political Studies, 43(12). https://doi.org/10.1177/00104010374019

Clayton G. L., et al. (2017). The INVEST project: Investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials. Trials, 18, Article 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1955-y

Gallego, A. et al. (2014). Places and preferences: A longitudinal analysis of self-selection and contextual effects. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 529-550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000337

Huber, J. D. (2012). Measuring ethnic voting: Do proportional electoral laws politize ethnicity? American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00601.x

Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. Yale University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1dszvhq

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bg23

McClendon, T. K. (2026). Why intelligence measurement fails and what it would take to get it right. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6572518

Reno, W. (1998). Warlord politics and African States. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Warlord_Politics_and_African_States.html?id=rUpCIqrw-fgC&redir_esc=y




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpss.v9i2.2316

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Saa Emerson Lamina, Robert Daud Korsu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017 - 2026. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.