PAKISTAN MEDIATION ROLE FUELING THE WORLD'S MULTI-POLARIZATION CONFLICT

Eslam Said Elshenawy

Abstract


This paper examines Pakistan’s mediation within the broader context of the strategic rivalry between the United States and China for global influence, with particular emphasis on South Asia as a critical geopolitical arena. It addresses the following research question: how does the current convergence between the United States and Pakistan constrain Islamabad’s ability to maintain a balanced relationship with both major powers? The study argues that the emerging rapprochement between Washington and Islamabad—manifested in Pakistan’s mediation role in the U.S.–Iran conflict and reinforced through recent economic engagements across sectors such as oil, cryptocurrency, mining, and hospitality—has the potential to complicate relations between China and Pakistan. More specifically, Beijing, which seeks to ensure that Pakistan prioritizes the stabilization of Afghanistan in order to safeguard its economic and strategic interests, particularly those linked to the Belt and Road Initiative, has expressed growing concern over Islamabad’s recent diplomatic posture. China’s strategic objective centers on fostering stability in Afghanistan as a prerequisite for the successful implementation of regional connectivity projects associated with the BRI. However, Pakistan’s mediation efforts and its deepening engagement with Washington are perceived in Beijing as indicative of a shift in strategic priorities. The paper concludes that China interprets these developments as evidence that Pakistan may be privileging U.S. interests, potentially at the expense of Chinese economic objectives. Such a perception not only risks undermining bilateral cooperation but may also contribute to prolonging instability in Afghanistan, thereby jeopardizing regional projects and, potentially, facilitating a renewed U.S. strategic presence in the country.

Keywords


mediation, hegemony struggle

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adlakha, H. (2026, April 10). Expert Explains | View in China on Pakistan’s mediation: Chance for ‘global rebrand’, but pressure-driven. (T. I. Express, Ed.) The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/expert-explains-china-view-pakistan-mediation-iran-us-10629357/

Ali, S. M. (2020, December 1). The U.S.-China Strategic Rivalry and its Implications for Pakistan. (STIMSON, Ed.) STIMSON. Retrieved from https://www.stimson.org/2020/the-u-s-china-strategic-rivalry-and-its-implications-for-pakistan/

Awan, S. (2026, April 21). Caught Between Giants: Pakistan in the US–China Competition. (T. D. Insight, Ed.) The Diplomatic Insight. Retrieved from https://thediplomaticinsight.com/caught-between-giants-pakistan-us-china/

Bin Javaid, O. (2026, March 29). Pakistan hosts four-nation bid to encourage US, Iran towards diplomacy. (A. English, Ed.) Al Jazeera English. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/29/pakistan-hosts-four-nation-bid-to-encourage-us-iran-towards-diplomacy

Brüggemann, L. (2026, March 24). Pakistan will Friedensgespräche zwischen USA und Iran ausrichten – JD Vance als möglicher Vermittler? (B. Zeitung, Ed.) Berliner Zeitung. Retrieved from https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/news/pakistan-will-friedensgespraeche-zwischen-usa-und-iran-ausrichten-jd-vance-als-moeglicher-vermittler-li.10026606

Davies, C. (2026). How Pakistan won over Trump to become an unlikely mediator in the Iran war. London: BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy91vrzxn34o

Die Zeit. (2026, March 29). Pakistan kündigt Gespräche zwischen den USA und dem Iran an. (D. Zeit, Ed.) Die Zeit. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2026-03/usa-iran-pakistan-gespraeche-krieg-nahost

Fähnders, T. (2026, March 30). Warum Pakistan im Irankrieg vermittelt. (F. A. FAZ, Ed.) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung FAZ. Retrieved from https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/iran-krieg-warum-pakistan-sich-als-vermittler-versucht-200686407.html

Gould, N. (2026, March). Mediation guide - the basics. (Fenwickelliott, Ed.) Fenwickelliott.

Khurshid, I. (2026, April 7). Pakistan’s Mediation Ambitions and China’s Quiet Discontent. (PRF, Ed.) PRF. Retrieved from https://prfworld.org/pakistans-mediation-ambitions-and-chinas-quiet-discontent/

Lal, N. (2026, April 16). Why India is rankled by Pakistan playing mediator in US-Iran war. (S. C. Post, Ed.) South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/opinion/asia-opinion/article/3350023/why-india-rankled-pakistan-playing-mediator-us-iran-war

Lercher, N. (2026, April 1). Pakistan: Weshalb eine Kriegspartei nun Frieden stiften soll. (Waston, Ed.) Waston. Retrieved from https://www.watson.ch/international/iran/704614284-pakistan-weshalb-eine-kriegspartei-nun-frieden-stiften-soll

Mediate. (2026). How Pakistan emerges as key mediator in US-Iran war, what we know so far. Mediate. Retrieved from https://mediate.com/news/how-pakistan-emerges-as-key-mediator-in-us-iran-war-what-we-know-so-far/

New York times. (2026). Pakistan’s Telephone Diplomacy. New York: New York times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/26/world/asia/pakistan-iran-united-states-talks.html

Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2026). Foreign Policy. Islamabad: Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://mofa.gov.pk/foreign-policy

Peters, M. (2026, March 30). Friedensstifter Pakistan? So will das Land im Krieg vermitteln. (S. Nachrichten, Interviewer) SRF Nachrichten. SRF Nachrichten. Retrieved from https://www.srf.ch/news/international/nahost/krieg-im-nahen-osten-friedensstifter-pakistan-so-will-das-land-im-krieg-vermitteln

Rumi, R. (2026, March 31). USA-Iran-Gespräche: Pakistan steht unter Erfolgsdruck. (DW, Interviewer) DW. DW, Bonn. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/de/usa-iran-gespr%C3%A4che-pakistan-steht-unter-erfolgsdruck/a-76598524

Saifullah, K., & Qaisrani, I. H. (2022). Soft Power in the Foreign Policy of Pakistan: Prospects and Potentials. (t. I. Islamabad, Ed.) the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad.

Sharma, S. (2026, March 30). Why Pakistan’s ambitious bid to mediate in the US-Iran war could ‘backfire’. (T. Independent, Ed.) The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/south-asia/pakistan-us-iran-talks-middle-east-war-b2948142.html

Singh, A. G. (2026, April 22). The Future of China and Pakistan’s ‘Iron Friendship’. (O. R. Foundation, Ed.) Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-future-of-china-and-pakistan-s-iron-friendship

Staniland, P. (2026, April 1). Why Pakistan is Mediating Between the United States and Iran. (T. C. Affairs, Ed.) The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Retrieved from https://globalaffairs.org/commentary/analysis/why-pakistan-mediating-between-united-states-and-iran

Von Schwerin, U. (2026, March 31). Pakistan ist der wichtigste Vermittler im Iran-Krieg. Warum gerade dieses Land zu Trumps Liebling wurde. (NZZ, Ed.) NZZ.

Wagner, C. (2026, March 30). Imagegewinn und andere Motive. Tagesschau. (ARD, Interviewer) ARD. ARD, Cologne. Retrieved from https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/asien/pakistan-iran-usa-vermittlung-100.html

Xinting, D., & Yueyao, Z. (2026, April 20). Pakistan Mediation Between the U.S. and Iran refelects Profound Evaluation of the International Landsacpe. (I. C. Center, Ed.) International Cooperation Center. Retrieved from https://en.icc.org.cn/thinktank_theories/intl_observation/445.html




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpss.v9i2.2251

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Eslam Said Elshenawy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017 - 2026. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.