PLAINTES NUMÉRIQUES ET STRATÉGIES DISCURSIVES : LE CAS DES CONSOMMATEURS CAMEROUNAIS SUR FACEBOOK

Bernard Mulo Farenkia

Abstract


Avec l’essor des Nouvelles Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication, les client(e)s disposent désormais de la possibilité d’utiliser les réseaux sociaux pour exprimer leur satisfaction ou leur insatisfaction à l’égard des services ou produits proposés par les entreprises. Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous nous appuyons sur un corpus de 304 plaintes publiées par des clients de la compagnie camerounaise d’électricité, ENEO-Cameroon, sur Facebook. L’objectif est d’examiner la thématique de ces plaintes ainsi que les stratégies discursives mobilisées par les énonciateurs et énonciatrices pour manifester leur mécontentement face aux multiples dysfonctionnements des services auxquels ils estiment avoir droit. L’analyse s’inscrit dans la pragmatique du discours numérique écrit et s’appuie sur les théories des actes de langage, de la gestion des faces et de la politesse linguistique. Les résultats mettent en évidence l’usage et la combinaison de diverses stratégies pragmatiques et linguistiques visant à exprimer le ras-le-bol des clients et à construire une image négative de l’entreprise prestataire. 

With the rapid development of Information and Communication Technologies, customers now can use social media to express their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the services or products offered by companies. In this study, we draw on a corpus of 304 complaints posted by customers of the Cameroonian electricity company, ENEO-Cameroon, on Facebook. The objective is to examine the complaint topics as well as the discursive strategies used by the complainants to express their dissatisfaction with the numerous service malfunctions they believe they should not have to endure. The analysis is situated within the pragmatics of digital written discourse and relies on speech act theory, facework, and linguistic politeness. The results highlight the use and combination of various pragmatic and linguistic strategies aimed at expressing customers’ exasperation and constructing a negative image of the service-providing company.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


plaintes numériques, stratégies discursives, discours numérique écrit, impolitesse / politesse, mécontentement des consommateurs / digital complaints, discursive strategies, digital written discourse, impoliteness / politeness, customer dissatisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cavalieri, Silvia & Corrizzato Sara (2022). ““We’re sorry for any inconvenience caused”: Pragmatic aspects of handling complaints in customer-airline company tweets.” Lingue Linguaggi 53 (2022), 101-115. Disponible sur: http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/linguelinguaggi/article/viewFile/25829/21837

Cenni I. and Goethals P. (2017). “Negative hotel reviews on TripAdvisor: A cross-linguistic analysis”. Discourse, Context & Media” 16, 22-30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.004

Culpeper, Jonathan, Bousfield, Derek, et Wichmann, Anne (2003). “Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects”. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10), 1545 1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2

Culpeper, Jonathan (1996). “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3

Decock. S., Depraetere I. (2018). “(In)directness and Complaints: A Reassessment”. Journal of Pragmatics 132, pp. 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010

Depraeterea I., Decock S. and Ruytenbeek N. (2021). “Linguistic (in)directness in Twitter complaints: A contrastive analysis of railway complaint interactions”. Journal of Pragmatics 171, 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026

Develotte, Christine (2012), « L’analyse des corpus multimodaux en ligne1 : état des lieux et perspectives ». Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2012. Disponible sur: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5505/8de7e804dcbcdbe641616ac1e70416f93e5e.pdf [Dernier accès le 27 février 2020]

Develotte, Christine et Paveau, Marie-Anne (2017), « Pratiques discursives et interactionnelles en contexte numérique. Questionnements linguistiques ». Langage et Société, (En ligne), Disponible sur : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01672265/document [Dernier accès le 26 février 2020].

Einwiller S.A. and Steilen, S. (2015). “Handling complaints on social network sites - An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies”. Public Relations Review 41[2], 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012

Equoy Hutin Séverine (2010). « La Relation Client : Quand l’Analyse du Discours rencontre le Marketing ». Jun 2010, ANGERS, France. ffhalshs-00585718f, Disponible sur: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00585718/document. Consulté le 31 octobre 2024.

Fouli M., Clarke I., Wiegand V., Ziezold H., and Mahlberg M. (2021). “Responding Effectively to Customer Feedback on Twitter: A Mixed Methods Study of Webcare Styles”. Applied Linguistics 42 [3], 569-595.

Ho Victor (2018). “Exploring the effectiveness of hotel management's responses to negative online comments”. Lingua 216, 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa046

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (2005). Les actes de langage dans le discours. Théories et fonctionnement. Paris. Armand Colin. https://www.dunod.com/lettres-et-arts/actes-langage-dans-discours-theorie-et-fonctionnement-0

Laforest, Marty et Moïse, Claudine. (2013). « Entre reproche et insulte, comment définir les actes de condamnation ? ». In : B. Fracchiolla, C. Moïse, C. Romain & N. Auger (dir.), Violences verbales. Analyses, enjeux et perspectives (pp. 85 105). Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes. https://hal.science/hal-01969711/document

Marcoccia, Michel (2016), Analyser la communication numérique écrite, Paris, Armand Colin. Disponible sur: https://shs.cairn.info/analyser-la-communication-numerique-ecrite--9782200602987

Marpurdianto Khrais (2021). “Complaint Strategies Found on Instagram Account @Indihome from Indonesia and @Tmobile from Usa: Cross-Cultural Pragmatics”. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching 8 [1], 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v8i1.4072

Moeschler Jacques (1985). Argumentation et conversation. Éléments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours. Paris. Hatier.

Orthaber, Sara (2019). “Aggressive humour as a means of voicing customer dissatisfaction and creating in-group identity”. Journal of Pragmatics 152 (2019) 160-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.002

Paveau, Marie-Anne (2017). L’analyse du discours numérique. Dictionnaire des formes et des pratiques, Paris, Hermann. https://shs.cairn.info/l-analyse-du-discours-numerique--9782705693213?lang=fr

Pöll, Brenhard (2005). Le français langue pluricentrique ? Étude sur la variation diatopique d’une langue standard. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Le-fran%C3%A7ais-langue-pluricentrique-Etudes-sur-la-P%C3%B6ll/ca4dcb6fa2bfc70f1f8cc233f243717bb517b796

Tereszkiewicz, Anna (2019). Customer Encounters on Twitter. A Study of Positive Evaluation and Complaint Management on English Corporate Profiles. Jagiellonian University Press. Disponible sur: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/customer-encounters-on-twitter/ECC5FE553B7C9915445B8FCB3D3CA029

Unuabonah, F. O. & Oladipupo, R. O. (2018). “You're not staying in Island sha o”: O, sha and abi as pragmatic markers in Nigerian English.” Journal of Pragmatics, 135, 8-23. Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.007

Vanderveken, Daniel (1988). Les actes de discours. Essai de philosophie du langage et de l’esprit sur la signification des énonciations. Liège / Bruxelles : Pierre Mardaga. Disponible sur: https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Les_actes_de_discours.html?id=rx655ulB1YAC&redir_esc=y

Vásquez Camilla (2011). “Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor”. Journal of Pragmatics 43 [6], 1707- 1717. Disponible sur: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=wle_facpub

Vladimiroua D., House J. and Kádárde D.Z. 2021, “Aggressive complaining on Social Media: The case of #MuckyMerton”. Journal of Pragmatics 177, 51-64. Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.017




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v10i1.682

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bernard Mulo Farenkia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2026. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.