QUANTIFYING NUMBER IN THE NOUN PHRASE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ENGLISH AND MACEDONIAN

Aneta Naumoska, Biljana Naumoska-Sarakinska

Abstract


This paper discusses some of the theoretical insights for English gained by means of a contrastive analysis with Macedonian on the issue of grammatical/semantic number in the NP, with a particular focus on the features of partitivity, collectivity and distributivity reflected through marked external (grammatical) means. Quantifying the NP provides information on the fragmentation of the whole, togetherness of the whole (with non-determinedness of entities), or the individuality of each element of the whole. The quantitative characteristics are visible in the NP structure, while the syntactic relationships formally realize the connection between the quantity in the NP and semanticity. Through excerpted examples from authentic source materials (in English and Macedonian) and translations, it will be concluded that both languages have more commonalities than differences in the morphology and semantics of these features, although precision of language means is necessary to avoid miscommunication. 

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


semantics, number, partitivity, collectivity, distributivity

Full Text:

PDF

References


a. English

Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: OUP.

Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and Countability. Language, 56, 541–567.

Allwood, J., Andersson, L., & Dahl, O. (1977). Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.

Barwise, J. (1979). On Branching Quantifiers in English. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 47–80.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of Semantic Parameter. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and Grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70) (pp. 53–103). Dordrecht: Klewer.

Corbett, G. G. (2001). Number. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics VIII (pp. 6340–6342). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: CUP.

Crnič, L. (2010). On the (Non-)Cumulativity of Cumulative Quantifiers. In M. Prinzhorn, V. Schmitt, S. Zobel (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14 (pp. 117–133).

Cruse, A. D. (1994). Number and Number Systems. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics V (pp. 2857–2861). Oxford: Pergamon.

Falco, M., & Zamparelli, R. (2019). Partitives and Partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.642

Gillon, B. S. (1987). The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10, 199–219.

Grimm, S. (2012). Number and Individuation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.

Haspelmath, M. (1995). Diachronic Sources of ‘All’ and ‘Every’. In B. Emmon, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, & B. Partee (Eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 54) (pp. 363–382). Dordrecht: Klewer.

Higginbotham, J. (1994). Mass and Count Quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 447–480.

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.

Jespersen, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.

Kouider, S., Halberda, J., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2006). Acquisition of English Number Marking: The Singular-Plural Distinction. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 1–25.

Landman, F. (1989). Groups I and Groups II. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 509–542, 723–744.

Levin, M. (2001). Agreement with Collective Nouns in English. Sweden: Lund University.

Link, G. (1998). Ten Years of Research on Plurals: Where Do We Stand? In F. Hamm, & E. Hinrichs (Eds.), Plurality and Quantification (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 69) (pp. 19–54). Dordrecht: Klewer.

Mathieu, E. (2014). Many a Plural. In A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Weak Referentiality (pp. 157–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Moltmann, F. (2004). The Semantics of ‘Together’. Natural Language Semantics, 12(4), 289–318.

Nickel, B. (2012). Plurals. In D. Fara, & G. Russell (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language (pp. 392–408). New York: Routledge.

Parsons, T. (1970). An Analysis of Mass Terms and Amount Terms. Foundations of Language, 6(3), 362–388.

Pelletier, F. J. (1974). On Some Proposals for the Semantics of Mass Nouns. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 3, 87–108.

Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sauerland, U. (1994). Codistributivity and Reciprocals. Proceedings of WECOL 24, 224–237.

Schein, B. (2006). Plurals. In E. Lepore, & Smith, B. C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language (pp. 716–767). Oxford: OUP.

Schwarzschild, R. (2011). Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns, and the Count/Mass Distinction. Proceedings of NELS 39, 661–678.

Syrett, K., & Musolino, J. (2013). Collectivity, Distributivity, and the Interpretation of Plural Numerical Expressions in Child and Adult Language. Language Acquisition, 20(4), 10–22.

Topolińska, Z. (1981). Remarks on the Slavic Noun Phrase. Wroclaw: Prace Instytutu jezyka polskiego.

Winter, Y., & Scha, R. (2014). Plurals. In S. Lappin, & C. Fox (Eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (2nd ed.) (pp. 77–113). UK: Wiley Blackwell.

b. Macedonian

Конески, Б. (1999). Граматика на македонскиот јазик (второ изд.). Скопје: Детска радост.

Конески, К. (2003). Зборообразувањето во современиот македонски јазик (второ изд.). Скопје: Филолошки факултет „Блаже Конески“.

Марков, Б. (1973). Nomina singulativa и collectiva во современиот македонски јазик. Јужнословенски филолог, XXX. 391–402.

Минова-Ѓуркова, Л. (2000). Синтакса на македонскиот стандарден јазик. Скопје: Магор.

Минова-Ѓуркова, Л. (1986). Збирноста во македонскиот јазик (од синтаксичка гледна точка). Македонски јазик, XXXVI–XXXVII. 47–58.

Петроска, Е. (2008). Количествените категории во македонскиот јазик: од семантика кон форма. Скопје: Македонска реч.

Петроска, Е. (2006). Количествените категории дистрибутивност и колективност во македонскиот јазик. Предавања на XXXIX меѓународен семинар за македонски јазик, литература и култура. 27–32.

Петроска, Е. (2001). За двојното согласување на конструкциите од типот група деца во современиот македонски јазик. XXVII научна конференција на XXXIII меѓународен семинар за македонски јазик, литература и култура. 141–151.

Тополињска, З. (1974). Граматика на именската фраза во македонскиот литературен јазик: род, број, посоченост. Скопје: МАНУ.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v8i1.501

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Aneta Naumoska, Biljana Naumoska-Sarakinska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.