MORPHOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY OF NOUN-FORMING SUFFIXES IN ENGLISH AT THE LEVEL OF WORD-FORMATION RULES

Maja Žarković Mccray

Abstract


This paper studies the morphological productivity of noun-forming suffixes at the level of word-formation rules in a corpus comprised of news, literary, academic, and TV registers. The productivity at the aforementioned level is the union of the productivity at the level of word-formation types and morphological types, which implies showcasing the productivity rates of semantic and morphological interactions leading to conceptual categories. Presenting the productivity rates of these interactions is the main aim of the paper. After finding examples of complex nouns with various noun-forming suffixes, we then analyzed 1077 examples and categorized them into 6 different clusters (Action, Agent, State, Result, Instrument, and Object) using analytic, descriptive and statistical methods. The analysis of word-formation types shows that the highest productivity rates are achieved with word-formation types where the conceptual category of the stem was changed due to the semantic input the attached suffixes brought into the word structure, thus determining which clusters the formed nouns would fall into. The exceptions we found were [agent – agent] in Agent, [state – state] in State and [object – object] in Object where the interaction showed how conceptual categories of the stem were not changed but refined by the suffix. Morphological analysis shows the interaction of 37 different suffixes with simple or complex nouns, adjectives, and simple verbs. The only morphological type was stem + suffix, because we were primarily interested in the interaction of suffixes and stems and not in the analysis of the stem structure itself. The conclusions stemming from these analyses are the following: suffixes occur in one or multiple clusters, heavily influence the conceptual category of the stem, and can have the same or different meanings, confirming why they are effective mechanisms for inserting additional pieces of semantic information into the word structure, which was the initial hypothesis of the research.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


morphological productivity, word-formation rules, word-formation types, morphological types, noun-forming suffixes in English

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, L., 2014. AntConc (Version 3.2.4). [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/. Accessed: 12/5/2022.

Aronoff, M., 1983. Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists, edited by Shirro Hattori and Kazuko Inoue, 163 – 171, Tokyo: Proceedings Pub. Committee.

Aronoff, M., 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Baayen, H. R., 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, edited by Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle, 109–149, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Baayen, H. R. and Neijt, A., 1997. Productivity in context: a case study of a Dutch suffix. Linguistics 35: 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.3.565.

Baayen, H. R. and Renouf, A., 1996. Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovationsin an English newspaper. Language 72: 69–96. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hbaayen/publications.html. Accessed: 10/1/2013.

Baayen, H. R., 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, edited by Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle, 181–208, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Baayen, H. R., 1994. Derivational Productivity and Text Typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1: 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179408589996.

Bauer, L., 2004. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Du, L. and Zhang, X., 2010. A Survey of the Measurements of Morphological Productivity. English Language Teaching. Vol. 3. No. 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081444. Accessed: 10/1/2023.

Fernández-Domínguez, J., Díaz-Negrillo, A. and Štekauer, P., 2007. How is Low Productivity Measured? Atlantis. www.atlantisjournal.org/archive/29.1./2007fernandez_diaz_stakauer.pdf. Accessed: 10/1/2013.

Grzega, J., 2002. Some Thoughts on a Cognitive Onomasiological Approach to Word-Formation with Special Reference to English. Onomasiology Online, 3: 1–29.

Harris, Z. S., 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.

Hay, J. and Baayen, H. R., 2002. Parsing and Productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, edited by Geert E. Booji and Jaap van Marle, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hbaayen/publications.html. Accessed: 20/1/2013.

Hay, J. and Baayen, H. R., 2003. Phonotactics, pasing and productivity. Revista di Linguistica 15.1. http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/~hbaayen/publications.html. Accessed: 10/1/2013.

Jovanović, V. Ž., 2008. English Morphology: A Coursebook. Niš: Filozofski fakultet Niš.

Lieber, R., 1981. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Plag, I., 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plag, I., Dalton-Puffer, C., and Baayen, H. R. 1999., Productivity and register. English Language and Linguistics 3: 209–228. .

Štekauer, P., Chapman, D., Tomščíkova, S., and Frank, Š., 2005. Word-formation as creativity within productivity constraints: sociolinguistic evidence. Onomasiology Online 6: 1–55. http://www1.ku-eichstaett.de/SLF/EngluVglSW/stekauer1051.pdf. Accessed: 20/3/2014.

Štekauer, P., 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Štekauer, P., 2005a. Onomasiological Approach to Word Formation. In The Handbook of Word-Formation, edited by Pavol Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber, 207–232, Netherlands: Springer.

Štekauer, P., 2005b. Meaning Predictability in Word Formation. Novel, context-free naming units. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Yule, G., 1996. The study of language. Second Edition. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Žarković Mccray, M., 2022. Morphological Productivity of Compound Nouns in English at the Level of Word-Formation Types. In Наука и стварност. Зборник радова са научног скупа. Књига 15, edited by Jelena Marković, 459–477, Pale: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu.

Žarković Mccray, M. M. and Kujundžić, M. R., 2022. Morfološka produktivnost složenih imenica u engleskom jeziku na nivou pravila tvorbe. Philologist – journal of language, literary and cultural studies. Vol. 13. No. 25: 49–67. DOI 10.21618/fil2225049z.

Žarković, M. M. 2017. Razlika između takozvanih morfološki mrtvih i određene grupe neproduktivnih prefiksa u tvorbi imenica i pridjeva u engleskom jeziku. Радови Филозофског факултета. Филолошке науке. Број 19: 83–100. doi: 10.7251/FILN1719083Z.

Žarković, M. M. 2019a. Razlika između takozvanih morfološki mrtvih i određene grupe neproduktivnih sufiksa u tvorbi imenica i pridjeva u engleskom jeziku. In Наука и стварност. Зборник радова са научног скупа. Књига 13, edited by Jelena Marković, 312–332. Pale: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu.

Žarković, M. M. 2019b. Produktivni prefiksi u tvorbi imenica u engleskom jeziku. Радови Филозофског факултета (часопис за хуманистичке и друштвене науке). Број 21: 151 – 171. doi:10.7251/FIN1921151Z.

Corpus

a. Newspaper register [Accessed from April through August 2013]:

www.theguardian.co.uk. (TG)

www.telegraph.co.uk (DT)

www.thesun.co.uk (TS)

b. Literary register [Retrieved from http://www.freebookspot.es/, accessed in April 2013]:

Groff, Lauren. 2009. Delicate Birds and Other Stories. Hyperion

Lucky Chow Fun (DBLCF)

L.DeBard and Aliette (DBLDA)

Majorette (DBM)

Blythe (DBB)

The Wife of the Dictator (DBTWD)

Watershed (DBW)

Sir Fleeting (DBSF)

Fugue (DBF)

Delicate Edible Birds (DBDEB)

Hayes, Sadie. 2011. The Start-Up. The Anti-Social Network. Backlit Fiction (ASN).

Casey, Ryan. 2012. What We Saw. Higher Bank Books. Amazon Kindle Edition (WWS).

Keplinger, Kody. 2013. Secrets and Lies. New York: Poppy, Hachette Book Group.

People Worth Knowing (SLPWK)

Academic register [Retrieved from http://www.freebookspot.es/, accessed in June 2013]:

Ginges, Jeremy, and Atran, Scott. 2009. “Noninstrumental Reasoning over Sacred Values: An Indonesian Case Study.” In Moral Judgement and Decision Making, edited by D. Bartels, C. Bauman, L. Skitka and D. Medin, 193-206, San Diego: Eslevier. (ICS).

Bilz, Kenworthey, and Nadler, Janice. 2009. ”Law, Psychology, and Morality.” In Moral Judgement and Decision Making, edited by D. Bartels, C. Bauman, L. Skitka and D. Medin, 101-131, San Diego: Eslevier. (LPM).

Connolly, Terry, and Hardman, David. 2009. “Fools Rush In: A JDM Perspective on the Role of Emotions in Decisions, Moral and Otherwise.” In Moral Judgement and Decision Making, edited by D. Bartels, C. Bauman, L. Skitka and D. Medin, 275-306, San Diego: Eslevier. (FRI).

Boschma, Ron, and Martin, Ron. 2010. ”The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, edited by R. Boschma and R. Martin, 3–39, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. (AAS).

Stam, Erik. 2010. ”Entrepreneurship, evolution and geography.” In In The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, edited by R. Boschma and R. Martin, 139 –161, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. (EEG).

Hassink, Robert. 2010. ”Locked in decline? On the role of regional lockins in old industrial areas.” In The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, edited by R. Boschma and R. Martin, 450–468, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. (LID).

Carpenter, Brian E. 2013. NETWORK GEEKS: How They Built the Internet, 9–79. New York: Copernicus Books Springer Science+Business Media. (NG).

c. TV register [Accessed in April 2013]:

House (2012), (Season 8, Episodes 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22) Retrieved from http://clinic-duty.livejournal.com/ (H)

The Vampire Diaries (2010-2011), (Season 2, Episodes 5, 7, 16, 19 and 22) Retrieved from http://vampirediaries.wikia.com/wiki/Season_Two (VD)

Two And A Half Men (2009), (Season 7, Episodes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) Retrieved from http://torrentz.eu/ (TAHM)

The Big Bang Theory (2011), (Season 5, Episodes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) Retrieved from http://bigbangtrans.wordpress.com/ (BBT)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v6i3.415

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Maja Žarković Mccray

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.