Shujun Wan


News headlines play an important role in attracting readers’ attention. By comparing 200 online news headlines collected from the New York Times and China Daily online, this paper aims at finding out the difference in linguistic complexity of English online news headlines in a native English speaking country and a non native English speaking country.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


online news headlines; lexical complexity; syntactic complexity

Full Text:



(2020). Retrieved 18 October 2020, from Date of access 01.03.2019

-----2016. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2016.

Bao. 2009. “Syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ essays: A multidimensional perspective.” Foreign Language Teaching and Research 41 (4): 291-297

Brendel, Elke & Meibauer, Jörg & Steinbach, Markus. 2011. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In: Brendel, Elke et al, eds. Understanding Quotation. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 161-193.

Cambridge Dictionary. Date of access 02.03.2019.

Casanave, Christine. 1994. “Language Development in Students’ Journals.” Journal of second Language Writing 3 (3): 179-201.

China Daily. Date of access 27.02.2019.

Dijk, Teun A. Van. 1988. News as Discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferris, Dana R. 1994. “Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency.” TESOL Quarterly 28 (2): 414-420.

Gao, Lifen. 2016. “A Comparative Study of Conceptual Metaphors in English and Chinese Economic News Headlines.” Creative Education 7: 2629-2639.

Halliday, M.A.K. and Colin Yallop. 2007. Lexicology. A short Introduction. Date of access 17.03.2019.

Hu & Guo. 2013. “A Corpus-Based Study on the Differences of Chinese and American Online English Sports News Headlines from the Perspective of Cross-Cultural Communication.” International Journal of English Linguistics 3 (5): 87-94.

Kleinke, Sonja. 2000. “Women and Headline-Policy in German and English Local Daily Newspapers.” In: Ungerer, Friedrich, ed. English Media Texts Past and Present. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 67-84.

Lee, Hye-Kyung. 2012. “Linguistic Variations between English News Headlines in the U.S. and Those in Korea.” Linguistic Research. 29(2): 329-350

Lewis, Diana M. 2003. “Online news, a new genre?” In: Aitchison, Jean and Lewis, Diana M, eds. New Media Language. London and New York: Routledge. 95-104.

Linguistic Complexity Analyzer and Syntactic Complexity Analyzer. Date of access: 17.03.2019.

Lu, Xiaofei. 2010. “Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15 (4): 474-496.

Lu, Xiaofei. 2012. “The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives.” The Modern Language Journal 96 (ii): 190-208.

McNamara, Danielle S. et al. 2010. “Linguistic Features of Writing Quality.” Written Communication 27 (1) 57–86.

Napu, Novriyanto. 2018. “English and Indonesian Newspaper Headlines: A Comparative Study of Lexical Features.” European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies 2 (4): 103-116.

Newman, Nic et al. 2018. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018.

Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. “Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing.” Applied Linguistics 30 (4): 555-578.

Quirk, Randolph et al. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.

Reah, Danuta. 1998. The Language of Newspapers. London and New York: Routledge.

Schneider, Kristina. 2000. “The Emergence and Development of Headlines in British Newspaper.” In: Ungerer, Friedrich, ed. English Media Texts Past and Present. John Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 45-66.

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The New York Times. Data of access 27.02.2019.

U.S. and Those in Korea.” Linguistic Research. 29 (2): 329-350.

Verspoor, Marjolijn and Kim Sauter. 2000. English Sentence Analysis-An Introductory Course. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Wang, Sue & Slater, Tammy. 2016. “Syntactic Complexity of EFL Chinese Students’ Writing.” English Language and Literature Studies 6 (1): 81-86.

Wolfe-Quintero et al. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Xu et al. 2013. “A study on the syntactic complexity of English essays by in Chinese students of English.” Foreign Language Teaching and Research 45 (2): 264-320.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Shujun Wan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.