EXPLORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MIND MAPS IN ENHANCING IDEA GENERATION DURING PRE-WRITING ACTIVITIES IN ENGLISH FOR SIXTH-GRADE EFL STUDENTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Bui Thi My Hong, Thai Cong Dan, Le Thanh Long

Abstract


This study explores students’ perceptions of using mind mapping as a pre-writing strategy in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing class through a qualitative approach. The research was conducted with sixth-grade students at Phan Van Cam Secondary School in Vietnam, from which six participants were selected for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted at four stages of the learning process: during the pre-writing phase, before the writing test, after the intervention, and after the post-test. The interview data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns in students’ experiences and perceptions. The findings reveal that most students initially had little or no prior experience with mind mapping and often felt uncertain when beginning a writing task. After the intervention, students reported that mind mapping helped them generate ideas, organize their thoughts more clearly, and plan their writing more effectively. The visual and collaborative features of mind mapping also increased students’ engagement in the writing process. Although some challenges remained, particularly in idea development and vocabulary use, students expressed positive attitudes toward continuing to use mind mapping in future writing activities.

Keywords


mind mapping, pre-writing strategies, EFL writing, qualitative study, student perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jarf, R. (2009). Enhancing freshman students’ writing skills with a mind mapping software. Conference proceedings of "eLearning and Software for Education" (eLSE) Issue no.01 /2009, pp. 375-382.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280712269_Enhancing_freshman_students'_writing_skills_with_a_mind-mapping_software

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman. https://www.scribd.com/document/541708096/BROWN-2001-Teaching-by-Principles-an-Interactive-Approach-to-Language-Pedagogy-Longman-New-Y

Bukhari, S. S. F. (2016). Mind mapping technique to enhance EFL writing skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 4(1), 58–77.

https://ijlc.thebrpi.org/vol-4-no-1-june-2016-abstract-7-ijlc

Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215–218.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.010

Buzan, T. (2010). Mind mapping: Kickstart your creativity and transform your life. Pearson.

https://www.pearson.com

Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book. BBC Active.

https://archive.org/details/mindmapbook00buza

Briesmaster, M., & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Coherence and cohesion in EFL students’ writing production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 22(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n02a02

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE. http://bayanbox.ir/view/236051966444369258/9781483344379-Designing-and-Conducting-Mixed-Methods-Research-3e.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scribd.com/document/761189756/Creswell-and-Poth-2018-Qualitative-Inquiry-4th-Mr-Phi-s-e-Library-Page-1-646-Flip-PDF-Online-PubHTML5

Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press. https://www.scribd.com/document/502754483/Oxford-Applied-Linguistics-Zoltan-Dornyei-Research-Methods-in-Applied-Linguistics-Oxford-Applied-Linguistics-Oxford-University-Press-USA-2007

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (2011). A cognitive process theory of writing. In V. Villanueva & K. L. Arola (Eds.), Cross-talk in comp theory: A reader (3rd ed., pp. 273–297). National Council of Teachers of English. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239552089_A_Cognitive_Process_Theory_of_Writing

Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://www.troyspier.com/assets/files/bibliographies/teaching/graham_teaching_writing.pdf

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve the writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Alliance for Excellent Education.

https://all4ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/WritingNext.pdf

Graham, S. (2023). The science of writing for students and teachers. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003280859

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Longman.

https://archive.org/details/howtoteachenglis0000harm

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/teaching-and-learning-in-the-language-classroom-9780194421720

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667251

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Hyland, K. (2022). Teaching and researching writing (4th ed.). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050346

Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.1

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43220402_Qualitative_Research_Design_An_Interactive_Approach_JA_Maxwell

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891643

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.

https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/practical-english-language-teaching-nunan/M9780072821215.html

Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. https://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/theoryunderlyingconceptmaps.pdf

Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, T. B. T., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2023). Use of cohesive devices in paragraph writing by EFL students at English language centers in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 39(3), 152–169. https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/NCNN/article/download/95531/80694/

Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. JALT Journal, 28(2), 203–223.

https://jalt-publications.org/jj/articles/2451-concept-mapping-pre-task-planning

Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL writing. System, 38(2), 218–233. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251640675_Effects_of_task_complexity_on_fluency_and_lexical_complexity_in_EFL_students'_argumentative_writing

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190

Riswanto, & Putra, P. (2012). The use of mind mapping strategy in teaching writing at SMAN 3 Bengkulu, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 60–68.

http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_21_November_2012/20.pdf

Setyowati, L., & Widiati, U. (2014). Implementing mind mapping strategy in teaching writing to Indonesian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 7(10), 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n10p1

Tomlinson, B. (2014). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury. https://www.academia.edu/43760213/Developing_Materials_for_Language_Teaching

Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in the Malaysian university English test (MUET) writing. Creative Education, 7(4), 619–626.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74064

Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The use of mind mapping strategy in Malaysian ESL classroom. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 138–147.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p138

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286335617_Assessing_Writing




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejals.v9i1.696

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2026. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2602 - 0254 / ISSN-L 2602 - 0254). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.