INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREATIVITY AND INTELLIGENCE AMONG DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguirre, K., & Conners, F. (2010). Creativity and intelligence in preschoolers: Preliminary findings. The University of Alabama McNair Journal, 10, 1-7. http://graduate.ua.edu/mcnair/journals/2010/Aguirre.pdf
Akhtar, H., & Kartika, Y. (2019). Intelligence and creativity: An investigation of threshold theory and its implications. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 1, 131-138. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/8/4/38
Alshamsi, A. (2024). Conceptions of intelligence, giftedness, and talent over time. Sino-US English Teaching, 21(2), 559-565. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2024.12.002.
Almeida, L. S., Nascimento, E., Lima, A. O. F., Vasconcelos, A. G., Akama, C. T., & Santos, M. T. (2010). Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio (BPR-5): Estudo exploratório em alunos universitários. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(2), 155-162. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000200002&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Almeida, L. S., & Primi, R. (2000). Baterias de Prova de Raciocínio (BPR-5). Casa do Psicólogo.
Breit, M., Preuß, J., Scherrer, V., Moors, T., & Preckel, F. (2022). Relationship between creativity and intelligence: A multimethod investigation of alternative theoretical assumptions in two samples of secondary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221118558
Chiodi, M. G., Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2011a). Estudo de correlação entre criatividade e habilidades intelectuais [Resumos]. Em Associação Brasileira de Criatividade e Inovação (Org.). Anais do I Congresso Internacional de Criatividade e Inovação. Manaus, Amazonas: Criabrasilis.
Chiodi, M. G., Nakano, T. C., & Wechsler, S. M. (2011b). Inteligência e criatividade: Um estudo correlacional [Resumos]. Em Associação Brasileira de Criatividade e Inovação (Org.), Anais do I Congresso Internacional de Criatividade e Inovação. Manaus, Amazonas: Criabrasilis.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Colom, R. (2008). Nos limites da inteligência: É o ingrediente do êxito na vida? Vetor.
Frith, E., Elbich, D. B., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Chen, Q., Kane, M. J., Silvia, P. J., Seli, P., & Beaty, R. E. (2021). Intelligence and creativity share a common cognitive and neural basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(4), 609-632. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000958
Gerwig, A., Miroshnik, K., Forthmann, B., Benedek, M., Karwowski, M., & Holling, H. (2021). The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking - A meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020023
Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2001). On clustering validation techniques. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 17(2–3), 107–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012801612483.
IBM (2026). Análise de cluster hierárquica. https://www.ibm.com/docs/pt-br/spss-statistics/32.0.0?topic=edition-hierarchical-cluster-analysis.
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41(4), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., Chruszczewski, M. H., & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2/3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
Kim, K. H. (2006). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2
Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2019). Children’s Creativity: A Theoretical Framework and Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707.
Lemos, G. C., & Almeida, L. S. (2019). Compreender, raciocinar e resolver problemas: novo instrumento de avaliação cognitiva. Análise Psicológica, 2(37), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1583.
Lynch, S. F., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). Creativity, intelligence, and wisdom: Could versus should. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 455-464). Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.021
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
Nakano, T. C. (2012). Criatividade e inteligência em crianças: Habilidades relacionadas? Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 28, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722012000200003
Nakano, T. C. (2025). Teste de Criatividade Figural: Versão para adolescentes e adultos. Vetor.
Nakano, T. C., Batagin, L. R., & Fusaro, L. H. (2022). Figural Creativity Test: Initial investigation for use in adolescents and adults. Paidéia, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3230
Nakano, T. C., Batagin, L., Cano, I. W., & Fusaro, G. (2023). Teste de Criatividade Figural versão adolescentes e adultos: Evidências de validade do tipo convergente. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 69(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP69.3.01
Nakano, T. C., & Primi, R. (2024). Relações entre inteligência, criatividade, pensamento crítico e competências socioemocionais. In Instituto Ayrton Senna, R. Primi, T. C. Nakano, K. McGrew & J. Schneider (Orgs.), Educação no século XXI: Inteligência, pensamento crítico e criatividade (pp. 293-332). Instituto Ayrton Senna e Hogrefe.
Nakano, T. C., Batagin, L. R., & Fusaro, L. H. (2022). Figural creativity test: initial investigation for use in adolescents and adults. Paideia, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3230.
Nakano, T. C., Wechsler, S. M., & Primi, R. (2011). Teste de Criatividade Figural Infantil. Vetor.
Nogueira, S. M., & Pereira, M. (2008). Estratégias promotoras da criatividade. In M. F. Morais & S. Bahia (Orgs.), Criatividade: Conceito, necessidades e intervenção (pp. 253-278). Psiquilibrios.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Volume V): Students' Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en.
Pasquali, L. (2005). Teste Não-Verbal de Raciocínio Infantil (TNVRI). Vetor.
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-167). American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10692-009
Plucker, J. A., & Esping, A. (2015). Intelligence and creativity: A complex but important relationship. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9374-9
Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022
Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2000). Estudo de validação da Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio (BPR-5). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 16(2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722000000200009
Primi, R., McGrew, K., Schneider, J., Nakano, T. C., & Dias, N. M. (2024). Inteligência: Como é concebida com base nos modelos psicométricos? In Instituto Ayrton Senna, R. Primi, T. C. Nakano, K. McGrew & J. Schneider (Orgs.), Educação no século XXI: Inteligência, pensamento crítico e criatividade (pp. 13-76). Instituto Ayrton Senna e Hogrefe.
Renzulli, J. S. (2014). A concepção de superdotação no Modelo dos Três Anéis: um modelo de desenvolvimento para a promoção da produtividade criativa. In A. M. R. Virgolim & E. C. Konkiewitz (Orgs.), Altas habilidades/superdotação, inteligência e criatividade (pp. 219-264). Papirus.
Rindermann, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2004). Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: Testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models. Intelligence, 32(6), 573-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.005
Russo, C. F. (2004). Comparative study of creativity and cognitive-solving strategies of high-IQ and average students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800303
Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 599-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56(4), 360-362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.360
Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (2000). Intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 611-630). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511807947.028
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Udin, M. A., & Sohel, S. M. (2018). Mediating effect of creative self-belief in the influence of intelligence on creativity: an empirical study. Journal of Business Administration, 33, 357-382. https://cu.ac.bd/1/CUJBA%20(Vol.-33)-1-1.pdf#page=358
Uddin, M. A., Akter, A., Rashed, M. S., Al Mamun, A., & Munira, K. S. (2024). Predicting creativity in a moderated-mediation situation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100337
Valentini, F., & Laros, J. A. (2012). Métodos atuais de estatística aplicada e psicometria. In C. S. Hutz (Org.), Avanços em avaliação psicológica e neuropsicológica de crianças e adolescentes (pp. 7-40). Casa do Psicólogo.
Wechsler, S. (2004). Avaliação da criatividade verbal no contexto brasileiro. Avaliação Psicológica, 3(1), 21-31. https://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/avp/v3n1/v3n1a03.pdf
Wechsler, S. M., Nakano, T. C., Nunes, M. F. O., & Minervino, C. A. M. (2010). Avaliação cognitiva de crianças e jovens: Aspectos multidimensionais. In C. S. Hutz (Org.), Avanços em avaliação psicológica e neuropsicológica de crianças e adolescentes (pp. 31-68). Casa do Psicólogo.
Weiss, S., Steger, D., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2020). A reappraisal of the threshold hypothesis of creativity and intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040038
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v12i5.6856
Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Special Education Research (ISSN 2501 - 2428) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.
All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



