THE ROLE OF TEACHERS’ INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES ON THE TEACHING OF WRITING SKILLS IN ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

Rehabeam K. Shapaka

Abstract


Employing a qualitative single descriptive case study research design emanated from a constructivist worldview, the current study explores the role of teachers’ instructional strategies on the teaching of writing skills in English as a second language. Data was collected via interview schedule, field notes and an open-ended questionnaire in which a criterion purposeful sampling technique was used to select 20 teachers from 20 schools. Data analysis was conducted through thematic analysis, typological analysis, and content analysis using Atlas.ti and MAXQDA. The findings established the role of teachers’ instructional strategies on the teaching of writing skills, prevailing instructional strategies used and the interplay between them. Teachers need to study and learn the application of instructional strategies, apply strategies to optimise success and enhance teaching and learning, which results in student academic performance. Teachers should apply instructional strategies to enhance writing skills. Teachers’ instructional strategies play a critical role in the teaching of writing skills, which affects students and teacher performance, resulting in positive and negative student academic writing performance.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


teachers’ instructional strategies, teaching writing skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abad, M. (2023). EFL Teachers’ beliefs about listening and their actual listening instructional practices. Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, 25(1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n1.98510

Abdelgawad, A. S., & Selim, S. I. (2022). The effect of using video-based teaching on developing EFL listening comprehension skills among preparatory stage pupils. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(7), 2730-2743. Retrieved from https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/download/11850/7679/14104

Abdullah, G., Arifin, A., Saro’i, M., & Uhai, S. (2024). Assessing the influence of learning styles, instructional strategies, and assessment methods on student engagement in college-level science courses. International Education Trend Issues, 2(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i2.466

Abdullah, F., Almassry, M., Shamsudin, S., & Said, S. H. M. (2025). Identifying and addressing challenges in descriptive writing for secondary school ESL/EFL learners through the four-square writing method. English Language Teaching, 18(6), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v18n6p86

Adil, B., & Malik, M. S. (2025). Investigating the impact of first language use on writing skill in Moroccan EFL classrooms: Benefits and challenges. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1), 42-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i1.5836

Akinkugbe, M. (2025). Exploring cognitive models of writing: A comparative analysis of knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in engineering and education doctoral candidates’ candidacy exam Essays. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 107, 1-12. Retrieved from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLLL/article/view/63254

Alavi, S.M., Dashtestani, R., & Mellati, M. (2022). Crisis and changes in learning behaviours: Technology-enhanced assessment in language learning contexts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(4), 461-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1985977

Albus, P., Vogt, A., & Seufert, T. (2021). Signalling in virtual reality influences learning outcomes and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104154

Alisoy, H. (2024). The Role of Teacher Feedback in Enhancing ESL Learners' Writing Proficiency. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 1(2), 65-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.69760/1rmdzx45

Anderson-Cooper, A. H. (2020). Using games as a tool to teach vocabulary to English language learners [Doctoral dissertation]. Greensboro College.

Arfanti, Y., & Risnawaty, H. (2021). English teachers’ strategies in teaching listening comprehension for senior high school in MAN Serdang Bedagai. Indonesian Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 1(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.32696/ijeal.v1i1.1060

Arochman, T., Jabbar, S., Hutabarat, P., & Pitaloka, N. (2023). Infographics as a tool to facilitate English learning activities: Students’ perceptions. English Franca: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i2.7508

Attachoo, B., &Imsaard, P. (2024). Illuminating inclusive pedagogy in Thai EFL classrooms: Critical perspectives and practices in higher education. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature® The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(3), 229-245. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3003-16

Baillo, M., Pradia, M., Encarnacion, F. A., & Fernandez, E. (2025). Using task-based language teaching to enhance the oral communication skills of grade 11 students. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 9(2), 36-52.http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v9i2.618

Bal-Gezegin, B., Akbaş, E., &Başal, A. (2023). “Corpus made my job easier”: Preservice language teachers’ corrective feedback practices in writing with corpus consultation. New Directions in Technology for Writing Instruction, 279-295. Cham: Springer InternationalPublishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_14

Barrot, J., & Gabinete, M. K. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 59(2), 209-232. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/iral-2017-0012

Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading- writing connections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Linking_Literacies.html?hl=sl&id=yUICQshAIvgC&redir_esc=y

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812310

Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in higher education, 28(1), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372

Chanratana, C., Channyalin, D., Sievmei, S., Monyneath, N., & Sovann, L. (2024). EFL students’ perception of listening skills in core English and IELTS subjects: A study at a State University in Battambang. Journal of English for Specific Purposes in Indonesia, 3(2),125-134. https://doi.org/10.33369/espindonesia.v3i2.36183

Chen, Y.-L. (2019). L1 use in L2 writing: An exploration of writing processes in Taiwanese tertiary EFL students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 16-28.

Chung, E. (2023). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through visual learning aids in EFL classrooms. Asian EFL Journal, 30(2), 180–195.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Dey, I. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203412497

Dube, P., & Gumbo, L. (2020). Impact of the language of instruction on writing competence of learners in Zimbabwean secondary schools: A case of Gweru region. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 726-736. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.53.26

El Bouzidi, S. (2019). A sociocultural perspective on EFL writing instruction in Morocco. Journal of Language and Education, 5(1), 1-16.

Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Enhancing fluency: The role of listening strategies in English language learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 13-26. Retrieved from https://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/article/view/5440/1125

Esperanzate, M. D. (2025). Teaching academic writing in English to ESL/EFL learners in higher education: A systematic review of strategies and challenges. Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.69739/jemr.v2i2.919

Etemadi, S.H., & Abbasian, G.-R. (2023). Dynamic assessment and EFL learners’ writing journey: Focus on DA modalities and writing revision types. Teaching English Language, 17(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2022.162923

Fenyi, K., Ivy Jones-Mensah, I., Tabiri, M. O., Owusu, E. (2021). Teaching listening skills in senior high schools in Ghana: Issues and directions. JEE Journal of English Education,7(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30606/jee

Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. (2015). Identity in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400021X

Fong, C. J., & Schallert, D. L. (2023). “Feedback to the future”: Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2134135

Haas, C., & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the construction of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39(2), 167-183.

Hamuda, M. A., Selamat, S., & Ismail, H. (2023). Factors that influence students' listening comprehension at Misurata preparatory schools, Libya. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science, 69(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.54922/IJEHSS.2023.0468

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. (2013). “Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.005

Hoang, T. T., & Yen, T. H. P. (2024). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on listening comprehension performance: A case study of English-majoring freshmen at Ba Ria-Vung Tau University, Vietnam. International Journal of Current Science Research and Innovation 7(5), 3336-3341. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/90-2905-2024.pdf

Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N.G., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: Variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2577-2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x

Kaushik, P. (2023). QEEG characterizations during hyperventilation, writing and reading conditions: A pre–post cognitive-behavioural intervention study on students with learning difficulties. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 5(1), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221147158

Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006

Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarisation practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005

Khezrlou, S. (2021). Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 568-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656765

Khezrinejad, M., Rashtchi, M., &Seifoori, Z. (2025). The effects of pre-task conditions on EFL learners’ cognitive processes and writing performance. Teaching English Language, 19(1), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2024.401334.1477

Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2023). Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms: Linguistic performance and writing development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101247

Kutasi, R. (2023). Feedback: Unveiling its impact and enhancing its effectiveness in education. Revista de Pedagogie, 71(2), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.26755/RevPed/2023.2/7

Lamb, R., Firestone, J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Hand, B. (2019). A computational model of student cognitive processes while solving a critical thinking problem in science. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514357

Lasauskaite, R., Richter, M., &Cajochen, C. (2023). Lighting color temperature impacts effort-related cardiovascular response to an auditory short-term memory task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101976

Latupono, L., & Nikijuluw, R. C. G. V. (2022). The importance of teaching listening strategies in English language context Matai. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30598/matail.v2i2.5935

Lee, H., & Kim, H. (2020). The effects of first language and language switching on bilingual writers’ text production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 81-99.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson. Retrieved from https://pce-fet.com/common/library/books/51/2590_%5BPaul_D._Leedy,_Jeanne_Ellis_Ormrod%5D_Practical_Res(b-ok.org).pdf

Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2023). Exploring EFL learners’ cognitive/emotional dissonance in content-based foreign language instruction: An ecological perspective. System, 114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103019

Ling, P., & Ling, L. (2017). Methods and paradigms in education research: Employing paradigms in education research. In L. Ling & P. Ling (Eds.), The Power of the Paradigm: Methods and Paradigms in Education Research (pp. 19-41). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1738-2.ch02

Liu, L. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2024). Effects of metalinguistic corrective feedback on novice EFL students' digital game‐based grammar learning performances, perceptions and behavioural patterns. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 687-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13400

Macbeth, K. P. (2010). Deliberate false provisions: The use and usefulness of models in learning academic writing. Second Language Writing, 19(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.08.002

Mandouit, L., & Hattie, J. (2023). Revisiting “The Power of Feedback” from the perspective of the learner. Learning and Instruction, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101718

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2024). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 55(3), 810-818. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221150811

Mellati, M., Alavi, S.M., & Dashtestani, R. (2022). Reduction of errors in writing assignments: A comparison of the impact of peer, teacher, and mixed feedback. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 152-166.

Mercader, C., Ion, G., & Díaz-Vicario, A. (2020). Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8),1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283

Mili, I., Trabelsi, S., Mezigh, S., Mokrani, M., Golnik, K., & Boukari, M. (2024). Features of effective feedback. Annals of Eye Science, 9, 13-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aes-23-72

Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture. (2024). End of the year 2023 Examination Statistics. Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture, Windhoek, Namibia.

Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1720946

Molavi, H. (2024). Exploring stakeholder perceptions and policy implications for strategic management of large‐size classes: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3481

Moussa, A., Fisher, J., &Eddahmani, H. (2024). Transformative Insights: Global Perspectives on Feedback Quality for Elevating Undergraduate Students’ Engagement and Motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 390-410.

Moustaoui, M., Amazouz, R., & Benali, A. (2019). Students' perceptions of the use of computer technology in the teaching of EFL in Morocco. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 799-815. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/9742

Mthombeni, Z. M., & Ogunnubi, O. (2020). An appraisal of bilingual language policy implementation in South African higher education. South African Journal of African Languages, 40(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2020.1804278

Muhammad, H., & Batubara, F. (2023). Students’ obstacles in listening comprehension in English learning. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching (JLLLT), 3(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.37249/jlllt.v3i1.508

Muharmah, A., & Fauzan, U. (2024). Grammatical Errors of the Ninth-Grade Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing. EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v9i3.262

Mupupuni, G. (2024). Developing English language writing skills using the process model in Zimbabwean schools. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 8(3), 268-278. https://doi.org/10.59765/csory3749

Nhan, L. (2023). The impact of infographics on EFL adolescent learners’ vocabulary retention. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 6(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p101

Nhani, L. K., & Quang, L. V. N. (2025). English-major students’ perceptions at Nam Can Tho University regarding the use of infographics to infographics to improve English vocabulary learning. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(3), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i3.6073

Nhongo, R. (2024). Terminology development through translanguaging as an intellectualisation strategy for African languages in andragogic contexts. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1284-1297. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.10040

Ortega, M. A. S., & Contreras, O. R. (2021). Integrating authentic materials into strategy-based-instruction to improve listening comprehension. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(7), 1143-1152. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Integrating-Authentic-Materials-into-Strategy-based-Ortega-Contreras/4d42a7f3390faf17e3109879481739e38b93ee72

Panadero, E. & Jonsson, A. (2020). A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329

Pecorari, D. (2008). Good and original: Plagiarism and patch writing in academic second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004

Polio, C., & Shi, L. (2012). Perceptions and beliefs about textual appropriation and source use in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.001

Saeedi, M. (2023). Effects of repeating tasks of different complexity levels on EFL learners’ oral production. Teaching English Language, 17(2), 391-415. https://10.22132/tel.2024.377408.1418

Saleh, A. M., & Althaqafi, A. S. A. (2022). The effect of using educational games as a tool in teaching English vocabulary to Arab young children: A quasi-experimental study in a kindergarten school in Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079806

Sam, A.H., Wilson, R., Westacott, R., Gurnell, M., Melville, C., & Brown, C. A. (2021).Thinking differently – Students' cognitive processes when answering two different formats of written questions. Medical Teacher, 43(11), 1278-1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1935831

Scherer, S., Graham, S., & Busse, V. (2024). How effective is feedback for L1, L2, and FL learners’ writing? A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101961

Shahab, M. L., & Saeed, K. M. (2024). Direct and indirect written corrective feedback: Lecturers' Perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 29(10), 2582-2603. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol29/iss10/3/

Shapaka, R. K. (2024a). The effect of advisory teachers’ instructional strategies on implementation of the revised curriculum for English as a second language. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 11(6), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14582001

Shapaka, R. K. (2024b). The effect of teachers’ instructional strategies on the teaching of reading comprehension in English as a second language. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(4), 46-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i4.5601

Shapaka, R. K. (2025a). The effect of teachers’ instructional strategies on the teaching of vocabulary learning in English as a second language. European Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 61-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i4.5601

Shapaka, R. K. (2025b). The role of teachers’ instructional strategies on the teaching of listening comprehension in English as a second language. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(3), 50-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i3.6249

Shaw, P., & Pecorari, D. (eds.). (2013). Source use in academic writing: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), A1-A3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.001

Shen, Y., & Coker, D. L. (2022). Exploring reading-writing connections in native English speakers and English language learners. Reading and Writing, 36(8), 2099-2117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10355-6

Shi, B., Huang, L., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing performance and writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37(3), 361-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220911626

Skripsi, A. (2024). An analysis of teachers’ listening teaching strategies: A case study of English teachers in SMPN2 Cibinong. State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Soodmand A. A.H., & Doosti, M. (2022). Implementing and evaluating a peer-coached EFL teacher professional development program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 92, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102096

Soodmand A. H., Ranjbar, N., &Yenkimaleki, M. (2025). Written corrective feedback in language education: A qualitative meta-synthetic study. Teaching English Language, 19(1), 119-158. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2024.450086.1581

Soodmand A. A. H., & Ranjbar, N. (2023). Mixed methods research in applied linguistics: The status quo of the current issues and practices. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 49-74. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1373279.pdf

Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes. In reading and writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 256-287. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED334543.pdf

Stotsky, S. (1983). Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions. Language Arts, 60(5), 627-642. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41961512

Suliman, W. (2024). Using self-and peer-correction to enhance college students’ writing ability. Journal of the Nordic Academy of Wisdom, 2(12), 170-186.

Sumabat Jr, A. A., & Martinez, D. M. A. (2025). Unveiling pedagogical insights: Investigating English teachers’ wrote corrective feedback strategies. European Journal of English Language Teaching. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v10i2.6143

Taringa, B., & Manyike, V. T. (2023). Counting cost, ignoring value: The gap between political and linguistic autonomy among the Ndau in Zimbabwe. Indilinga-African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 22(2), 167-185.

Tatsanajamsuk, P. (2024). Unpacking the roles of reading-to-write and writing-only approaches: A comparative case study of Thai undergraduate students. rEFLections, 31(1), 199-234. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Unpacking-the-Roles-of-Reading-to-Write-and-A-Case-Tatsanajamsuk/08ff7b724f229e5913d95d687f6449a66aac42fc

Taye, T., & Teshome, G. (2024). Investigating The Impact of Grammatical Mistakes on English Writing Skills: The Case of 1st-Year English Language and Literature Undergraduate Students at Mizan Tepi University. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4703351

Teng, F. (2020). Vocabulary learning through videos: Captions, advance-organiser strategy, and their combination. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–33.

Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60(5), 568-580. https://doi.org/10.58680/la198326307

Tomazin, L., Lipnevich, A. A., & Lopera-Oquendo, C. (2023). Teacher feedback vs. annotated exemplars: Examining the effects on middle school students’ writing performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101262

Toufaha, S. (2024). The effect of automated error corrective feedback on the improvement of EFL learners’ writing and autonomy (Doctoral dissertation, University Kasdi Merbah Ouargla. Retrieved from https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/bitstream/123456789/35662/1/SAHKI%20Toufaha_compressed.pdf

Waluyo, B., & Wangdi, T. (2024). Task-based language teaching in academic English higher education: A case of low-proficiency learners in Thailand. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature® The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(3), 182-195. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3003-17

Wang, M. (2019). L1 Influence on L2 Writing: Error analysis of Chinese EFL students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 179-191.

Williams, A. (2024). Delivering Effective Student Feedback in Higher Education: An Evaluation of the Challenges and Best Practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(2), 473-501. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3404

Woymo, T. H., Bachore, M. M., & Jobo, M. M. (2024). The effects of form-focused communicative grammar instruction on students’ pronunciation and grammar in speaking. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p61

Xu, J., Fan J., & Luo, K. (2021). Exploring L2 listening instruction, self-efficacy, and strategy use: A mediation analysis. Front. Psychol. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758757

Yenkimaleki, M. & Heuven, V. J. van (2022). Comparing the nativeness vs. intelligibility approach in prosody instruction for developing speaking skills by interpreter trainees: An experimental study. Speech Communication, 137, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.007

Yoon, H. J., & Abdi Tabari, M. (2023). Authorial voice in source-based and opinion-based argumentative writing: Patterns of voice across task types and proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101228

Zare, M., Bagheri, M.S., Sadighi, F., & Rassaei, E. (2021). An investigation of the linguistic complexity of IELTS writing topics based on the levels of discourse representation and the degree of meaning coding. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1868235

Zhao, R. (2015). Exploring Reading and Writing Connections in the Synthesis Writing of Multilingual Students in a Second Language Writing Classroom. (Doctoral dissertation).https://etd.ohiolink.edu/pg_10?0::NO:10:P10_ACCESSION_NUM:osu1433507195

Zhao, Z., Nimehchisalem, V., Chan, M. (2025). The effects of task types and working memory capacity on the writing production of Chinese EFL learners. Journal of Teaching and Research, 16(2), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.17

Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, Z. (2023). Understanding individual differences in lower-proficiency students’ engagement with teacher-written corrective feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1806225




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i4.6372

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).