AMATEUR RUNNERS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES IN GREECE

Yannis Georgiou, Angeliki Fotiou, Pinelopi-Agapi Georgiou

Abstract


This study investigates the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of amateur long-distance runners for the implementation of environmentally sustainable initiatives during competitive running events, beyond the standard registration fee. A sample of 327 amateur runners (226 males, 101 females) was recruited through snowball sampling and completed an online survey disseminated via Facebook over six weeks. The questionnaire encompassed demographic and socioeconomic variables, general WTP, participants’ perceptions of event attributes and specific environmental measures, alongside their environmental attitudes relating to the purchase of eco-friendly products. Respondents were also requested to quantify their additional monetary contribution beyond the participation cost. Findings reveal that the majority of participants exhibit a high WTP for eco-friendly interventions in race organization. Organizational and environmental event factors predominantly influenced specific environmental actions that were highly valued, yet overall positive engagement. Among the independent variables examined, only gender demonstrated a statistically significant effect, suggesting the need for further exploration. This research is pioneering within the Greek context, aligning with comparable international studies, and uniquely provides a quantitative assessment of WTP. The results offer critical insights for event organizers regarding the financial viability of integrating sustainable practices. Future research should expand on these findings with larger, more representative samples, incorporating motivational factors and perceived service quality as predictors of WTP.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


willingness to pay, long-distance runners, marathon runners, environmental sustainability in sports, environmentally friendly initiatives

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson‐Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: a review of sup-ply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 17(5), 497-516. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258573

Babiak, K. & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibil-ity and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.229

Canniford, R. & Hill, T. (2022). Sportswashing: How mining and energy companies sponsor your favourite sports to help clean up their image. The Conversation, 17. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/sportswashing-how-mining-and-energy-companies-sponsor-your-favourite-sports-to-help-clean-up-their-image-173589

De Pryck, K. (2021). Intergovernmental expert consensus in the making: the case of the summary for policymakers of the IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report. Global Environmen-tal Politics, 21(1), 108-129. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00574

Georgiou, Y., Patsantaras, N., & Kamberidou, I. (2024). The running tribes: Typology of the long-distance running community of Greece. European Journal of Physical Edu-cation and Sport Science, 11(3).

Gionfriddo, G., Rizzi, F., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2023). The impact of green marketing on collective behaviour: experimental evidence from the sports industry. Busi-ness Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5349-5367. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3420

Goyal, P., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. (2015). Identification and prioritization of corporate sustainability practices using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Modelling in Management, 10(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-09-2012-0030

Greenhalgh, G. & Drayer, J. (2020). An assessment of fans’ willingness to pay for team’s environmental sustainability initiatives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 29(2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.292.062020.04

Greenhalgh, G. & Drayer, J. (2020). An assessment of fans’ willingness to pay for team’s environmental sustainability initiatives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 29(2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.32731/smq.292.062020.04

Harrison, V., Vafeiadis, M., & Bober, J. (2022). Greening professional Sport: how com-municating the fit, proximity, and impact of sustainability efforts affects fan per-ceptions and supportive intentions. Sustainability, 14(6), 3139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063139

Hautbois, C. & Desbordes, M. (2023). Sustainability in Sport: Sport, Part of the Prob-lem… and of the Solution. Sustainability, 15(15), 11820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511820

Holdgate, M. W. (1987). Our Common Future: The Report of the World Commission on Envi-ronment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York: xv+ 347+ 35 pp., 20.25× 13.25× 1.75 cm, Oxford Paperback, £ 5.95 net in UK, 1987. Environmental Conservation, 14(3), 282-282. doi:10.1017/S0376892900016702

Hugaerts, I., & Könecke, T. (2024). Determinants of the Willingness to Pay for Environ-mental Sustainability in Participatory Sport Events. Journal of Global Sport Man-agement, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2024.2397991

Hwang, S., Lee, J., & Jang, D. (2024). Climate change awareness and pro-environmental intentions in sports fans: applying the extended theory of planned behavior model for sustainable spectating. Sustainability, 16(8), 3246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083246

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Mas-son-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Mat-thews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3−32. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.001. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/climate-change-2021-the-physical-science-basis/summary-for-policymakers/8E7A4E3AE6C364220F3B76A189CC4D4C

International Olympic Committee. (2021a). The IOC’s climate positive commitment. Re-trieved from https://olympics.com/ioc/sustainability/climate-positive-commitment, 02 September 2025

IOC. (2021). IOC Sustainability Report 2021. International Olympic Committee. Re-trieved from https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/News/2021/12/IOC-Sustainability-Report-2021.pdf

Kellison, T., McCullough, B., Cianfrone, B., & Pelcher, J. (2024). Inter- and intra-team differences in professional sport fans’ environmental attitudes. International Jour-nal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 26(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-07-2024-0174

Könecke, T., Schunk, H., Schappel, T., Hugaerts, I., Wagner, F., & Malchrowicz-Mośko, E. (2021). German marathon runners’ opinions on and willingness to pay for en-vironmental sustainability. Sustainability, 13(18), 10337.

Lyu, S. O. (2024). Unveiling willingness to pay for green stadiums: Insights for Sport. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139985

McCullough, B., Casper, J., & Smith, D. (2022). Fan responses of sponsored environmen-tal sustainability initiatives. Sustainability, 14(21), 14062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114062

O'Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, so-cial and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation. The British Accounting Re-view, 37(2), 205-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005

Orr, M. & Inoue, Y. (2019). Sport versus climate: introducing the climate vulnerability of sport organizations framework. Sport Management Review, 22(4), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.09.007

Ribet, S. & Brander, L. M. (2020). Willingness to pay of trail runners for sustainable country park use in Hong Kong. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100320

Sher, C. and Fusco, C. (2024). Sports and sustainable development: the troubling ab-sence of meat sourcing policies in the sports sector. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1341810

Trail, G. & McCullough, B. (2020). Marketing sustainability through Sport: testing the sport sustainability campaign evaluation model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1580301

Triantafyllidis, S. & Kaplanidou, K. (2018, June). Olympus mountain marathon and par-ticipants' willingness to pay for CO2 offsetting: The mediation effect of pro-environmental consciousness. In Proceedings of the 2018 NASSM Conference, Hali-fax, NS, Canada (pp. 5-9).

Wicker, P. (2019). The carbon footprint of active sport participants. Sport Management Review, 22(4), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.07.001

World Athletics. (2024). Athletics for a Better World — Sustainability reporting and standards. World Athletics Report 2024. Retrieved from https://worldathletics.org/athletics-better-world/sustainability/athletics-for-a-better-world-standard




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v12i10.6378

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Yannis Georgiou, Angeliki Fotiou, Pinelopi-Agapi Georgiou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).