EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES OF USING GEMINI FOR DEVELOPING ENGLISH ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY WRITING SKILLS
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmadi, D. M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
Akinwamide, T. K. (2012). The influence of process approach on English as a second language students’ performances in essay writing. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p16
Al-Kadi, A. (2025). Fostering a “Human with AI” approach for evaluating students’ writing in English. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 13(1), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24560.16642
Al-Raimi, M., Mudhsh, B. A., Al-Yafaei, Y., & Al-Maashani, S. (2024). Utilizing AI tools for improving writing skills: EFL learners’ perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 1177–1197. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177
AlSagri, H. S., Farhat, F., Sohail, S. S., & Saudagar, A. K. J. (2025). ChatGPT or Gemini: Who makes the better scientific writing assistant? Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09549-0
Ariyanti, A. (2016). Shaping students’ writing skills: The study of fundamental aspects in mastering academic writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.5
Azmi, K., & Fithriani, R. (2025). Students’ perceptions of Gemini AI effectiveness in academic writing. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching & Learning, Linguistics & Literature, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i1.6278
Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44–55. Retrieved from https://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/ijele/article/view/858/0
Bibi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). Students’ perceptions of AI writing assistants: A study of satisfaction and experience. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 433–443.
Cai, Y., Pan, Z., & Liu, M. (2022). Augmented reality and AI technologies in language learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 929–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12661
Campbell, Y. C., & Filimon, C. (2018). Supporting the argumentative writing of students in linguistically diverse classrooms: An action research study. RMLE Online, 41(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2017.1402408
Chundru, T., & Rajeswari, V. R. M. T. (2025). The impact of AI-driven debate arena as a writing assistant on tertiary students’ writing skills: Opportunities and challenges. Special Issue, 14(2).
Colaco, D. M., & Antao, D. (2025). Exploring self-learning efficacy: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Gemini. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2023-0251
Dang, T. H., Chau, T. H., & Tra, T. Q. (2020). A study on the difficulties in writing argumentative essays of English-majored sophomores at Tay Do University, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i1.3389
Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014702
Fitria, T. N. (2025). Revolutionizing English learning with AI: Insights from ChatGPT and Google Gemini. International Journal of Computer and Information System, 6(2), 77–91. Retrieved from https://discovery.researcher.life/article/revolutionizing-english-learning-with-ai-insights-from-chatgpt-and-google-gemini/0fd825a0243b3c958a6bfec53215ccaf
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Google for Education. (2024). Gemini for learning: AI support for students and teachers.
Google Research. (2024). Multimodal capabilities of Gemini models.
Guo, K., Li, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ chatbot-assisted argumentative writing: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12230-5
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
Hanura, H., & Widiarti, T. R. (2025). Investigating students’ perceptions of AI-powered language learning tools in academic writing. Global Synthesis in Education Journal, 3(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.61667/dmx3j235
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next-generation AI educational tool: A review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00310-z
Kartika, S. (2025). The role of generative AI in automating English writing assessment: Benefits and challenges. LinguaEducare: Journal of English and Linguistic Studies, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.2v.1i.63
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Khamis, N. Y. H., & Yusof, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence revolutionising writing assessments. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v14i2.11444
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lang, G., Triantoro, T., & Sharp, J. H. (2024). Large language models as AI-powered educational assistants: Comparing GPT-4 and Gemini for writing teaching cases. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.62273/YCIJ6454
LearnLM Team, Modi, A., Veerubhotla, A. S., Rysbek, A., Huber, A., Wiltshire, B., … & Assael, Y. (2024). LearnLM: Improving Gemini for learning. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16429
Lee, G. G., Latif, E., Shi, L., & Zhai, X. (2023). Gemini Pro defeated by GPT-4V: Evidence from education. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08660
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essays: Higher education students’ perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Ng, M. L., Al Ghaithi, A., & Behforouz, B. (2025). The effect of Gemini on EFL learners’ writing skills and motivation. (Journal information forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6428474/v1
Nguyen, D. L., Le, P. T. T., & Le, T. T. (2025). Using Gemini for formative assessment in English academic writing: Critical insights into the AI tool’s efficacy. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516117
Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Syamsi, K. (2023). The potentials of AI for language learning: Unpacking its benefits and limitations. Register Journal, 16(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i2.224-247
Oğuz, E. (2025). Can generative AI figure out figurative language? The influence of idioms on essay scoring by ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Assessing Writing, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100981
Pikhart, M. (2020). Intelligent information processing for language education: The use of artificial intelligence in language learning apps. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1412–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.151
Pratama, R. D., Widiati, U., & Hakim, L. N. (2025). Effects of human–AI collaborative writing strategy on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2503900
Sari, F. (2023). EFL students’ perceptions of using AI for writing tasks. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1669804
Shin, D., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Yang, H. (2021). Exploring the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot as second language conversation partners. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 375–391. https://doi.org/10.15738/KJELL.21..202104.375
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with AI in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Wingate, U. (2012). “Argument!” Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of AI tools for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Zhu, W. (2001). Performing argumentative writing in English: Difficulties, processes, and strategies. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v19i1.918
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v10i3.6428
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies (ISSN 2501-5915) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.
All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



