REVISING ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF AI
Abstract
The proliferation of distance learning in higher education—accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and sustained by technological innovation—has brought assessment practices and academic integrity frameworks into sharp focus. However, institutional regulations and study guides often remain outdated, particularly in addressing the pedagogical and ethical implications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT. This article explores how open and distance learning (ODL) universities are responding to these challenges. Through a comparative review of policies from twelve ODL institutions across Europe, Africa, and Australasia, the study reveals inconsistent regulatory responses, limited integration of AI-specific guidance, and a continued reliance on surveillance-driven assessment. These gaps not only jeopardize the validity and inclusiveness of evaluation methods but also undermine trust in the academic process. The article concludes with actionable policy recommendations, suitable for the revision of their academic regulations. These include the incorporation of transparent AI-use declarations, critical thinking–driven assessment design, and national-level coordination for ethical, inclusive, and future-ready evaluation models. In doing so, the study contributes to the broader discourse on policy reform and pedagogical resilience in the AI age.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Athabasca University, 2025. Academic integrity and assessment policy. https://www.athabascau.ca/policies/academic/integrity-policy.html
Atkinson-Toal A, Guo C, 2024. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) education policies of UK universities. ETLHE 2: 70–94. https://doi.org/10.62512/etlhe.20
Bali M, Nouri J, Conrad D, Joksimovic S, Eynon R, Selwyn N, 2024. Generative AI in higher education: challenges, opportunities, and the future. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/25813
Bannister P, Urbieta A, Peñalver E, 2023. A systematic review of generative AI and (English Medium Instruction) higher education. Aula Abierta 52(4): 401–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.17811/rifie.52.4.2023.401-409
Burger B, Kanbach D, Kraus S, Breier M, Corvello V, 2023. On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management 26(7): 233–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156
Chan C, Hu W, 2023. Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Dabis A, Csáki C, 2024. AI and ethics: investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z
Delgado J, Manuel A, Jounou I, Moyano C, Rueda J, Guersenzvaig A, Puyol Á, 2022. Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: a scoping review. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 19(3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10200-z
Figueroa B, Eaton S, Pethrick H, Hayden A, Brennan R, Wiens J, McDermott B, 2024. Academic integrity and artificial intelligence in higher education (HE) contexts: A rapid scoping review. CPAI 7(3). doi: 10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i3.78123
Hellenic Open University, 2023. Regulation of studies. https://www.eap.gr/foitites/kanonismoi-kai-odigies
İskender A, 2023. Holy or unholy? Interview with Open AI’s ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research 34: 3414. http://dx.doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
Khatri B, Karki P, 2023. Artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education: Growing academic integrity and ethical concerns. Nepalese Journal of Development and Rural Studies 20(01): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3126/njdrs.v20i01.64134
Kong S, Lee J, Tsang O, 2024. A pedagogical design for self-regulated learning in academic writing using text-based generative artificial intelligence tools: 6-P pedagogy of plan, prompt, preview, produce, peer-review, portfolio-tracking. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 19: 030. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19030
Lin M, Liu A, Poitras E, Chang M, Chang D, 2024. An exploratory study on the efficacy and inclusivity of AI technologies in diverse learning environments. Sustainability 16(20): 8992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208992
Mariyono D, Hidayatullah A, 2024. Exploring AI's role in supporting diversity and inclusion initiatives in multicultural marketplaces. International Journal of Religion 5(10): 5549–5582. http://dx.doi.org/10.61707/apmwg008
McCarthy A, McNally C, Mitchell K, 2022. E-portfolio practice for student wellbeing in higher education: A scoping review. Ascilite Publications. https://doi.org/10.53761/7xwpq305
Mohammadi S, 2020. Classroom climate, academic self-concept, learning self-regulation, and academic identity status among EFL students: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Research in English Education 5(3): 90–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijree.5.3.90
Nkuyubwatsi B, 2016. A critical look at policy environment for opening up public higher education in Rwanda. Journal of Learning for Development 3(2). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v3i2.141
Open University, 2024. Using AI responsibly in your studies. https://help.open.ac.uk/using-ai-responsibly
Porter Z, Zimmermann A, Morgan P, McDermid J, Lawton T, Habli I, 2022. Distinguishing two features of accountability for AI technologies. Nature Machine Intelligence 4(9): 734–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00533-0
Pratiwi H, Suherman S, Ridha M, 2025. Between shortcut and ethics: navigating the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European Journal of Education 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
Sheffield Hallam University, 2024. Guidance on AI in assessment: Artificial Intelligence Transparency Scale (AITS). https://lta.shu.ac.uk/assessment-and-feedback/high-level-requirements/guidance-on-ai-in-assessment
Sullivan M, Kelly A, McLaughlan, P, 2023. ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 6. 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.
Sun L, Zhou L, 2024. Does generative artificial intelligence improve the academic achievement of college students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 62(7): 1676–1713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/07356331241277937
University of Birmingham, 2024. Principles on the use of generative artificial intelligence in education. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/libraries/education-excellence/gai/principles-on-the-use-of-ai
University of Dundee, 2024. Get help using AI responsibly in your studies. https://www.dundee.ac.uk/guides/get-help-using-ai-responsibly-study
University of Reading, 2024. Artificial Intelligence in teaching and learning. https://www.reading.ac.uk/cqsd/artificial-intelligence
University of South Africa (UNISA), 2025. Online Assessment Strategy. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/myunisa/default/Online-Assessment
University of West London, 2024. Artificial intelligence in education: Guidance for staff. https://www.uwl.ac.uk/staff/guidance-ai-use
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 2025. Assessment regulations. https://www.uoc.edu/portal/en/studies/assessment/regulations/
Zhao X, Cox A, Chen X, 2024. Disabled students’ use of generative AI in higher education. OSF Preprints. http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gdphx
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v10i2.6212
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies (ISSN 2501-5915) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.
All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
