Nguyen Hong Tran, Huynh Thi Nhu Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Thao Nhi, Tran Ngoc Bao Tran, Lam Nguyen Tan Loi, Thai Cong Dan


This research study aimed to investigate the usage of vocabulary learning strategies among English Studies students at Can Tho University (CTU), specifically those under the high-quality program at the School of Foreign Languages (SFL). The primary objective of the study was to identify the most commonly used strategies for learning English vocabulary and to compare the similarities and differences in how these strategies were applied among students by academic year. A total of 200 survey responses from SFL, CTU got involved in the study, and 12 of whom joined a semi-structured interview. The data gathered were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The results of this study provided insights into effective vocabulary learning strategies and would facilitate the improvement of English language teaching and learning practices at the university level.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter


vocabulary learning strategies, English studies students, high-quality program, Can Tho University

Full Text:



Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English language teaching, 4(2), 84.

Brown, T. S., & Perry Jr, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. Tesol Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.

Cameron, D. (2001). Vocabulary Learning: A Research Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Doan Ngoc Ai Thu (2022). Research on popular vocabulary learning strategies of students First year, Department of English, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University. Journal of Inquiry into Languages and Culture. Access at: Research on common vocabulary learning strategies of first-year students, English Department, University of Foreign Languages, Hue University - TaiLieu.VN

Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 1(2).

Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643-679.

Hoang Thi Hong Hanh (2019). Research on vocabulary learning strategies of first-year non-English major students at the University of Education - Thai Nguyen University. Science Magazine 2012:23b 42-49.

Harmon, J., Wood, D., & Keser, S. (2009). The relationship between vocabulary size and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 568-586. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 149-166.

Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kashani, S., & Shafiee, S. (2016). A comparison of vocabulary learning strategies among elementary Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 511.

Le Pham Hoai Huong (2018). Academic English vocabulary learning: Reflections by university students. Tạp chí Khoa học Ngôn ngữ và Văn hóa, Tập 2, Số 3, 2018, Retrieved from

Nguyen Thi Mai Huong and Trinh Thi Khanh Hoa (2021). Research on English vocabulary learning strategies of ethnic minority students at a school in a mountainous area of Vietnam. Hue Journal of Science 7(2)

Nguyen Thi Thu Trang (2019). Difficulties of students in learning English vocabulary. Journal of Foreign Language Science, University of Foreign Languages, Hanoi National University, 2(2), 22-28.

O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Pham Mai Linh (2022). Survey on English vocabulary learning strategies of first-year language major students at a school of Thai Nguyen University. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 227(04), 84-90.

Qian, D. D. (2008). The effects of cultural knowledge on vocabulary learning in a second language. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Rabadi, R. (2016). Vocabulary learning strategies employed by undergraduate EFL Jordanian students. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 47-57.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Schmitt, N., and McCarthy, M. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Taghinezhad, A., Azizi, M., Shahmohammadi, S., Kashanifar, F. S., & Azadikhah, M. (2016). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect learning strategies on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(1), 133-143. Accessed at:

Tran Thi Phuong Lan (2023). Research the current situation and propose solutions for learning English vocabulary for non-major students. Journal of Educational Sciences, Hanoi National University, 1(1), 22-28.

Tran Thi Thu Huong (2022). Difficulties of students in learning specialized English vocabulary. Journal of Foreign Language Science, University of Foreign Languages, Ho Chi Minh City National University, 4(2), 22-28.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies (ISSN 2501-5915) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).