Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.846667 SCHOOL DETENTION IN FINLAND: A PILOT STUDY Timo Saloviitai University of Jyvaskyla, Finland Abstract: Although detention is one of the most popular methods of punishment in schools, it is being met with increasing criticism as an educational intervention. Few studies have explored its use to date; therefore, the present pilot study was planned to survey the popularity of detention. By analyzing a representative sample of comprehensive school teachers (N = 2,276) in Finland at grade levels 1-9, it was found that 30% of Finnish school teachers regularly use this punishment. Differences in use were observed across gender, age, and teacher category. These results provide a baseline against which future follow-up studies can be compared. Keywords: after-school detention, classroom management, Finland, survey, teachers 1. Introduction Detention is one of the classic forms of punishment used by school teachers. In detention, the student is typically obligated to attend a designated classroom and sit there for a specified period, usually without doing anything. In Finland, the Act on Basic Education (1998) determines that detention can last a maximum of two hours. Before its implementation, a student must be heard, and his/her guardians must be given an opportunity to be heard. According to the recent amendment, the student can be ordered to undertake school work during the detention hour (Act on Basic Education, 1998). Details concerning the use of detention differ from country to country. In Victoria, Australia, detention is not allowed to exceed forty-five minutes, and it must consist of school work (Victoria State Government, 2014). In the United Kingdom, the Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 137 Timo Saloviita SCHOOL DETENTION IN FINLAND: A PILOT STUDY length of detention is not determined by law, but the punishment must be reasonable (Legislation.gov.uk, 1997). Recent interviews with two Finnish school principals provided a glimpse of the current use of detention in schools (Knaappila, 2014). The principal of a comprehensive school described that the typical reasons for detention in his school were failure to do homework or being late for lessons. Instances of misconduct are tallied, and detention is ordered based on cumulative scores. A second principal, who was from a senior high school, stated that, in his school, the main reason for detention was unauthorized exit from the school area. Punishment was implemented every Wednesday after school hours (Knaappila, 2014). In both these schools, thus, detention was part of school-wide classroom management programs in which the rules were plainly framed, and the implementation of detention was institutionalized as part of the schools’ routines. From the perspective of behavioral learning theory, detention comes close to a timeout procedure. Specifically, detention reminds isolation timeout in which the student is removed from the reinforcing environment to an environment where, hopefully, no reinforcers are available (Matson & DiLorenzo, 1984, p. 80; Wolery, Bailey, & Sugai, 1988). Timeout is considered a form of punishment even if it is not perceived as aversive as many other procedures (Costenbader & Reading-Brown, 1995; Turner & Watson, 1999). For downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/980 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 138