European Journal of Education Studies
ISSN: 2501 - 1111
ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111
Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu
10.5281/zenodo.54767
Special Issue: African Education – Contemporary and Future Challenges
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL
DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Kaloki Joseph Waita2, Kasau Onesmus Mulei1
Kitoo Beth Mueni1, Mutinda Julius Mutune1,
Dr. Jeremiah Kalai1
University of Nairobi, Kenya
1
Kenyatta University, Kenya
2
Abstract:
The objectives of this study were (a) to assess the impact of PTR on academic
performance in national examinations in public primary schools (b) establish if ideal
PTR exist in public primary schools as recommended by TSC, UNESCO and other
international standards. (c) to identify the major challenges faced in the attainment of
appropriate PTR in the public schools in the Division. (d) to determine whether PTR
influences academic performance. The study targeted the 78 public primary schools in
which a total of 24 schools were sampled for the study. Descriptive survey design was
used as the research design for the study. Questionnaires were used in collecting data
for the study. The analysis involved use of simple regression to determine whether PTR
predicts performance in national examinations. The relationship between PTR and
performance was worked out using Pearson s product moment correlation coefficient R,
the value of R calculated was -0.323. This negative correlation between the PTR and
performance indicated that as PTR increases performance decreases and vice versa. A
coefficient of determination R2 of 0.104 was obtained. This revealed that 10.4% of the
performance is due to PTR while the remaining 89.6 % is due to other intervening
factors or error in the independent variable. An Anova table was generated (p<0.05)
which indicated that the regression model applied was significantly good enough in
predicting the outcome variable. A regression model [scores = 260.8-7.60(PTR)] was
generated that could be used to predict the outcome variable. The findings of the study
revealed that PTR significantly influences performance of pupils in national
examinations. The study recommended to all Education sector stakeholders to pay
Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved
Published by Open Access Publishing Group ©2015.
37
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
adequate attention to PTR since it affects performance of pupils in Primary Schools. It
recommended to the government to employ more teachers to lower PTR and ease
teacher workload. It also recommended to the government and the MOE to review the
Education Act to enable schools admit pupils on basis of PTR to avoid over enrolment
and congestion in classrooms.
Keywords: pupil-teacher ratio, performance, impact, class size, contract teacher
Introduction
Provision of quality basic Education to all school-going children poses a fundamental
challenge to education and training systems in most countries, Kenya included. Despite
the major strides achieved particularly in access to primary education, major challenges
still remain. Among the challenges are the issue of improving quality and increasing
learning achievement.
There have been widely publicized calls for improving education access for the
World s children. Since the
World Conference on Education for All (EFA) in
Jomtien, there has been a five to seven per cent increase in school enrolments in primary
Education (UNESCO, 2005). The Kenya government is one of the governments
committed to the various international protocols including the 1990 Jomtien and the
2000 Dakar Declarations (MOEST, 2004). The Dakar 2000 goals included expanded
access for early childhood, free and compulsory education. Of the set goals, many
governments have made educational access central to their national development
strategy. Kenya, in particular has made notable advances in the quest for Universal
Primary Education (UPE) as a means of attaining the global target for EFA (Abagi &
Olweya, 1999). Major landmarks in this regard include implementation of Free Primary
Education by NARC government in 2003, which has been lauded as a success story in
Africa. Other landmarks include increased enrolments from 6.06 million pupils 2002 to
7.16 million pupils in 2003, an increase of 18 percent, and an attempt to democratize
education governance through decentralized management (Sifuna & Sawamura, 2008).
However, the road towards full attainment of UPE has been marked by
increasingly complex internal inefficiencies inform of congested classrooms and severe
shortage of teachers. As we are moving towards 2015, the target year of universalization
of elementary education, the issue of EFA and its implications on quality of education is
a matter of serious concern for the international community. Many developing
countries, Kenya included have made tangible achievements in the provision of free
primary education and subsequent increase in enrolments. The average net enrolments
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
38
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
for primary education in developing countries increased from 78% in 1990 to 83% in
Vander,
. Between
and
, the world s primary school age population
grew from 600 million to 648 million. Demographers argue that by 2015, the number
will exceed 700 million (World Education Forum, 2000). Sub-Saharan Africa has
recorded the largest increases in the primary school age group; up from 84 million in
1990 to 106 million in 2000, an average growth of 2.6 % per year.
While increased enrolments may suggest school systems have increased their
capacity to accommodate more children, this did not necessarily translate into
improved educational quality. The FPE was a noble idea, but the intended gains are
being eroded by lack of effective teaching-learning process (Daily Nation, 2011: 19).
Though developing countries have been able to improve the percentage of literacy to
impress the international fraternity, the quality of education provided has been a major
concern due to congested classrooms resulting from high enrolments. One of the major
indicators of quality is the Pupil-Teacher ratio (PTR). The primary school PTR did not
keep pace with rapid increase in enrolments. The greatest challenge facing developing
countries in their efforts to attain the international goals of EFA and the MDGs have
therefore been provision of quality education.
The PTR in most developing countries is in a worrying state. UNESCO (2006),
estimated that over 84 per cent of classrooms had over 40 pupils per teacher. Majority of
the countries that have PTR exceeding 40:1 are in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. SubSaharan Africa has the largest PTR with Congo having a PTR of 54:1, Mali 55:1,
Mozambique 67:1, Rwanda 65:1, Ethiopia and Malawi hovering around 70:1, South
Asian countries such as Afghanistan with 83:1,Cambodia 50:1, and Bangladesh 50:1.
(UNESCO, Institute of statistics, 2008). The high PTR in many developing countries is as
a result of large enrolments following the quest for universal primary education and the
increasing teacher shortages. With such enrolments and reduced number of teachers,
the available teachers face serious obstacles in an attempt to deal with over-crowded
classes. These high enrolments have caused low efficiency in the schools which is one of
the main reasons for the poor quality of education offered in many primary schools in
the developing countries (UNESCO, 2006).
In order to fulfill the international mandate, more and more developing
countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, South and East Asia and Latin America regions are
utilizing the services of less qualified teachers. In Cambodia, these teachers are given
fancy names like Bare foot teachers , contract and Para-teachers and provide first aid
services into the education system (King and Schielman, 2004). Countries such as Niger,
Mali, Togo, India and China have been recruiting contract teachers in order to cope
with teacher shortages and high PTR (UNESCO, 2006).
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
39
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
The classroom conditions are particularly acute in a number of developing countries
where large class sizes often swell up and go beyond 100 pupils (Ron, 2003). The reality,
however, is that high PTR due to overcrowded classrooms affect the quality of
education in resource poor schools. Brewe, Gamoran, Ehrenberg and Willms (2000)
noted that PTR is a global measure of human resources brought to bear , both directly
and indirectly, on children s learning. For the last one decade, the debate on PTR and
teacher shortage in public schools in developing countries has caused much concern in
both political and educational arena. Over the same period, concerns have been
particularly raised regarding the alarming shortage of teachers, increased enrolments
and raising PTR. This has been pointed to have detrimental impact on the quality of
education pupils receive and has from time to time been addressed by political and
educational leaders. The figures on PTR have been growing and the reasons for teachers
leaving the profession are mounting thus compromising quality of education and
performance in national examinations. The Global Monitoring Report on Education
2006 has projected that the number of Primary school children will increase by 24
million pupils (24 per cent) in Sub-Saharan Africa, and additional 5 million pupils (13
per cent) in Arab states between 2000 and 2015 (UNESCO, 2006)
In order to meet the challenge of increasing student population, beside the
infrastructural facilities, countries will need additional teachers to lower the PTR to
levels that can guarantee quality education. UNESCO (2006) estimates that more than
30 million new teachers will be needed to meet EFA goal by 2015. The greatest
challenge lies in Central and West Asia and the Sub-Saharan countries that will need at
least 10 per cent more teachers. The developing countries therefore have a dilemma; on
one hand they have to endure internal pressure to universalize elementary education
and on the other hand, they suffer from serious financial constraints. Across all regions,
there are 76 countries that need to enlarge their teaching force. These countries are
mostly found in Sub-Saharan Africa, Arab states, South and West Asia. According to
report by UNESCO institute for statistics, Sub-Saharan Africa will need another 1.6
million teachers by 2015 to provide every child with quality education. The report also
indicated that chronic teacher shortages are also expected in the Arab states, which will
need to expand their teaching force by 26 % in less than a decade to achieve the same
goal (UNESCO, 2005)
.
Another report by UNESCO indicated that countries in the World need to recruit
more than 28 million teachers in the next decade. The greatest challenge lies in SubSaharan Africa, which needs to expand its teaching force by 68 % over this period.
Mozambique is an example of one of the worst hit countries by teacher shortages with
the PTR of 67.4:1. The report further estimated that in Sub-Saharan Africa, the number
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
40
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
of primary school teachers must grow from about 2.5 million teachers to 3.7 million to
fulfill the EFA commitment, indicating a gap of 1.2 million teachers, more than half of
whom are needed in West Africa alone. It also estimated that for every two teachers
available in 2006, there must be three others by 2015 (UNESCO, 2006).
In Kenya, since
s the country has been facing a daunting challenge of
increasing PTR due to escalating teacher shortages. The situation grew worse with the
introduction of FPE in 2003. The implementation of FPE programme witnessed a 10%
increase in enrolment in primary schools nationally (MOEST, 2004). A record of 1.3
million children registered in various schools across the country, raising the enrolment
from 5.9 million in 2002 to 7.2 million in 2003 (MOEST, 2004). This sharp increase in
enrolment rejuvenated into challenges of FPE in the country (Wamukuru, Kamau and
Ocholla., 2006). For instance, the number of pupils exceeded the available human and
physical facilities in the country. The PTR steadily increased form the recommended
40:1 to between 60:1 and 90:1 (MOEST, 2004).
High enrolments were experienced in all primary schools in Kenya as the
government introduced cost-free schooling. This noble idea came with many challenges
such as lack of clear policy on the school going age, overcrowded classrooms,
insufficient infrastructural facilities and shortage of teachers. The Kenya government
was very positive in meeting the challenges and undertook major reforms in the
education sector and also partnered with other stakeholders to ensure success in
providing free primary education to all children (Wamukuru, Kamau and Ocholla,
2006)
The Table 1.1 below shows that enrolment in primary schools grew from 7.1
million pupils in 2004 to 7.6 million in 2008, translating to an increase of 7.0%.
Table 1.1: Public primary schools Enrolment by Province, 2003-2008
Province
Coast
Central
Eastern
Nairobi
R.valley
Western
Nyanza
N.Eastern
Total
,
,
,
,
,
2004
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
2005
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ��
Source: EMIS, Ministry of Education 2009
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
2006
550,908
811,490
1,355,595
193,209
1,914,292
1,082,715
1,273,614
78,295
7,260,118
2007
,
,
,
,
201,000
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,�
2008
,
822,664
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, �, �
41
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
The increase in enrolment occurred in the background of unexpanding teaching force
(GOK, 2005). This saw several facilities being overstretched, including the human
resource which was then thin on the ground following freezing of teacher recruitment
in 1997. Since 1997, the TSC has been recruiting teachers to replace those exiting
through natural attrition.
The plan not only affected the primary and secondary schools but as well as
institutions of learners with disabilities. Out of such a move, recruitment of teachers is
undertaken on the needs basis, filling the vacancies created due to death, retirement or
resignations rather than mass employment. Often, head teachers of primary schools
resort to diverting funds for supplies and construction to hiring more community
teachers (Fleshman, 2005). The government has been taking stringent measures to
contain the situation in the schools such as the introduction of contract teachers as the
case in some countries such as Cambodia. Although such strategy has not been widely
accepted by some section of the education sector stakeholders, it has been strongly
criticized by teacher unions in Kenya with the argument that there are over 40,000
unemployed teachers (Anami, 2010). This factor together with the introduction of free
primary education has over the recent year s exerted pressure on the teacher resource
resulting to high PTR.
Table 1.2: 2008 Primary Schools Scenario in PTR
Province
th
75 Percentile
PTR
62.57
47.51
47.33
52.42
52.75
63.2
57.23
85.5
Median PTR
Coast
50.93
Central
40.34
Eastern
37.67
Nairobi
44.88
R. valley
41
Western
52.6
Nyanza
44.87
N. Eastern
65.76
Total
Source: EMIS Teachers Service Commission 2009
No. of schools with
PTR>50
549
887
2073
91
2518
975
1740
143
8976
No. of schools with PTR
>75
275
444
1045
46
1253
487
870
74
4494
From table 1.2 most schools in all the provinces have PTR above 40 pupils per class.
North Eastern province is worst hit with most of the schools with PTR of 60:1. This is far
above the ideal ratio of 40:1 as recommended by UNESCO. According to the Human
Resource Report 2011, Kenya is in need of 52,335 more teachers in primary schools to
attain the ideal PTR as required by UNESCO. The report also indicated that the issues
of quality need to be addressed urgently.
The PTR in public primary schools was 34:1 in 2002 and increased to 44:1 in 2007
and 45:1 in 2008 (MOEST, 2009). This is a clear indication that either the number of
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
42
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
teachers is declining or the number of pupils is growing at a much faster rate than that
of the teachers which may have serious negative implications on performance. The ratio
may grow even worse with introduction of the new constitution which provides that
Education is a basic right . The recommended PTR for public primary schools in Kenya
is 40:1 (TSC, 2006) which is also ideal ratio set by UNESCO and other international
standards. This is not the case since the situation is grimmer in arid and semi-arid areas
as well as in the slums of urban areas where the ratio is over 100 pupils per teacher
(UNICEF, 2005). The quality of education in our primary schools was once again
brought into focus by the September 2010 teachers strike. KNUT national secretary was
quoted saying that schools have continued to post poor results in KCPE with high PTR
taking the blame (Daily Nation, 2011:14).
Statement of the Problem
Despite the Kenyan government, effort to provide free primary education there has
been a considerable success with regard to increased enrolments but the challenges
have been enormous. This euphoric response of free primary education witnessed
massive enrolments and deserves praises but of particular concern is the issue of quality
which may be reflected in terms of performance. Since the government freezed teacher
recruitment in Kenya in 1997, the available teachers in public primary schools have had
to cope with large classes. This problem has become perennial and concern has now
been over poor performance posted by the pupils each year in national examinations.
The overburdened teachers due high enrolments are no doubt a concern as the number
of teachers has not responded appropriately to the increased pupils population. Even
though the FPE programme is a noble idea, its intended gains may be eroded by poor
performance due to lack of observance on the ideal number of pupils per teacher
resulting from high enrolments and declining number of teachers.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The impact of class size and pupil-teacher ratio on educational outcomes is among the
most researched areas in education. By 1980s, more than 200 studies had appeared on
this topic (Hanushek, 1995). Some of the studies which have been conducted in different
parts of the world that relates to this study include the following;
1.
Class size reduction studies and the Meta-Analysis research in Far West
Laboratory.
2.
Large scale studies on class size and student achievement in America
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
43
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
3.
Impact of large classrooms on student s academic achievement and engagement
4.
Lessons Learnt from South African Consortium for Monitoring Education
Quality (SACMEQ).
5.
Studies on impact of large classrooms after implementation of FPE in Kenya.
Some early studies did not establish a connection between smaller class sizes and
students achievement, but mainly attempted to weigh the value of small classes against
larger classes. Most acceptable studies, however, supported the importance of small
classes in promoting students success. In a review of early studies, Educational
Research Service concluded that reducing class sizes in the primary grades to 22 or
fewer appeared to have a beneficial effect on reading and mathematics scores,
especially for economically disadvantaged pupils . Since that time, more sophisticated
experiments have confirmed and extended this conclusion (Hanushek, 1995).
Class Size Reduction Studies and the Meta-Analysis Research in Far West Laboratory
The first refined analysis to connect reduced class size to academic achievement was the
1978 Meta-analysis by Glass and Smith for the Far West Laboratory for Educational
Research and Development. Their study,
Meta–Analysis of Research on the
Relationship of Class size and Achievement
remains to be one of the most
comprehensive on this issue. Unique in their approach, the two researchers examined
and analyzed 77 empirical research studies, yielding more than 700 comparisons based
upon data spanning 70 years of research performed in more than a dozen different
countries (Glass and Smith, 1979).
Altogether, achievement test results of more than 900,000 pupils were
incorporated into the study to yield a statistical synthesis revealing general trends
(Glass and Smith, 1979).
This analysis found that not only did small classes improve the chances for
academic achievement, but that small classes could also be used as a predictor of
student s success. Glass and Smith
showed that
as class size increases,
achievement decreases . The results of their investigation suggested that a class size of
15 or fewer would be needed to make a noticeable improvement in classroom
performance. Repeated studies provided evidence of important relationships between
the number of students in the classrooms and students achievement. This research
demonstrated that an appropriate class size was fewer than 20 students, and that the
greatest benefits of small classes are obtained in the early grades.
The findings of the Meta-analysis study pointed out evidence between reduced
class size and pupil achievement. More specifically, the results showed that as class size
decreased, student achievement increased. The achievement of pupils in instructional
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
44
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
groups of 15 and fewer scored several percentile ranks above that of pupils in classes of
20 and 30 (Glass and Smith, 1979). The strength of the relationship varied according to
the level of the reduction. Reductions in class size below 20 students resulted in larger
improvements in student achievement than for reductions in the 20 to 30 range. Based
on their findings, Glass and Smith
concluded that there is little doubt that, other
things equal, more is reamed in smaller classes .
From the study undertaken by Glass and smith, there is need for further study in
different environment and situation to reveal whether smaller classes have any
relationship with student s achievement.
In another companion study Glass and Smith (1978), provided further insight
about whether decreasing the size of class produces improvements on non-achievement
outcomes such as teaching processes, student and teacher effects in effective domain.
Their findings answered the question in the affirmative with the following statement
on all measures, reduction in class size was associated with higher quality schooling
and more positive attitudes .
It is in line with their findings this study has resulted to find support for their
conclusions on the relationship between class size and student achievement and
students behavior.
Large Scale Studies on Class Size and Student Outcome in America
Based on this early work, beginning in the mid-1980s some large-scale projections and
an actual experiment in class size and student outcomes were started. Among them
were, the Tennessee Student-Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) experiment, the
Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program in Wisconsin, the
California s Massive Class-size Reduction (CSR) effort, the Project Prime Time in
Indiana, the Burke county Project in North Carolina and Federal Initiatives on Reducing
Class-size,.
The Tennessee Student-Teacher Ratio (STAR) experiment
The STAR project, conducted in Tennessee in 1985-1989, provided the most convincing
case for class size project (Bain, Johnson and Word, 1989). This gigantic study found
that smaller class-size and the lower student-teacher ratio had impact on student
achievement (Bain Johnson and Word, 1989). The findings of the study revealed that
academic achievement was increased significantly in the smaller class size (lower
student-teacher ratio) in the regular classes. This large-scale (n=11,600) longitudinal
study provided the legislature and administrators with convincing data to support
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
45
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
small class size and lower student-teacher ratio for students statewide (Bain, Johnson
and Word 1989).
The project was implemented in 79 schools for 7,000 K-3 students. At each grade
level K-3 a strictly controlled study was set up to examine whether small (13-17) classes
made a difference in student accomplishments in the early years, when compared to
regular (22-25) classes, or regular classes with full-time teacher aide. Children and
teachers were randomly assigned to one of the three types of classrooms: small (13-17)
students, regular (22-25 students with one teacher) and regular with teaching aide (2225 students with one teacher and one teaching aide). In evaluating the impact of these
three scenarios, they concluded that small classes (i.e.13-17 students with one teacher)
produced better student achievement in both reading and mathematics. Bain, Johnson
and Word (1989) analyzed 50 of the most successful teachers (i.e. those whose students
showed the greatest academic achievement) involved in the STAR study and revealed a
core of common features of these classrooms. Perhaps the more revealing feature,
however was that, of the 50 successful teachers exhibiting these qualities, all had either
small class (i.e. not greater than 20 pupils).
Because of its magnitude and scientific rigor, the results of STAR carried more
weight than earlier studies. The most important findings of the study were;
The benefits of small classes were greater for minority students and students
attending inner city schools than schools for white students or those in non-
urban schools.
In every grade level (K-3) students in small classes outperformed students in
larger classes on every achievement test administered in all subject areas and on
both norm-referenced and criterion-referenced achievement tests.
Pupils who attended small classes in K-3 performed significantly better in all
academic subjects in all subsequent grades 4, 6 and 8.
Additional strength was added to the STAR results by secondary analysts at the
University of London, the University of Chicago and Princeton University who
examined the STAR data using different statistical approaches. All approaches yielded
the same conclusions (Bain, Johnson and Word, 1989). Other large-scale class size
reduction efforts described below confirmed the basic findings of STAR in other
locations. Research using the STAR data continues today. Besides the impact on
academic achievement, project STAR revealed that:
Teachers of small classrooms spend more time on active teaching and less on
classroom management, a finding substantiated in other research in addition to
STAR.
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
46
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Teacher s morale is increased in small classes, a finding consistent with all prior
research.
There are fewer disruptions in small classes and fewer discipline problems, a
finding replicated in other studies.
Alderman, Orazem & Paterno (2001) contributed to this discussion, their study
concluded that higher student-teacher ratio had a consistent negative effect on student
achievement particularly on language skills. However, Graddy and Stevens (2003) in
their study concluded that student-teacher ratio was important determinant of fees and
parents choose schools with lower student-teacher ratio. Levacic (2005) concluded a
study on Grade KS3 and found that reduction in the student-teacher ratio had
statistically significant positive effect on mathematics achievement.
While the STAR project is often cited as the best evidence to reduce class sizes,
there is equal evidence to the contrary. Ehrenberg (2001) conducted a meta-analysis of
class size studies, examining its impact on student achievement. In contrast to the STAR
evaluation, Ehrenberg concluded that there was no significant evidence that variations
in class size explain improvements in student achievement. Even if some correlation did
exist; Ehrenberg suggested that the benefits are too modest to warrant the high costs of
class size reduction implementation.
The conclusions reached by Ehrenberg contradict earlier findings of the STAR
project that small classes contribute positively to students
achievement. This
contradiction therefore places the position of small classes and students achievement at
a doubt whether there exist any significant relationship.
This study will therefore seek to find whether any relationship exist between low
student teacher ratio and students achievement.
The SAGE Programme in Wisconsin
Another large scale study conducted in this area was the Student Achievement
Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program in Wisconsin. This was a statewide effort to
increase the academic achievement of children living in poverty by reducing the
student- teacher ratio in Kindergarten through Grade 3 to 15:1. The program began as a
five-year project in 1996-97 school years and tested the hypothesis that smaller classes
in Elementary schools raised academic achievement. School districts in Wisconsin that
had at least one school with 50% of children or more living below the poverty level
were eligible to become a SAGE school. The program required that participating
schools to implement four interventions among them being to reduce the pupil-teacher
ratio within a classroom to 15 students per teacher. The longitudinal evaluation of the
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
47
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
SAGE program produced substantial scientific data on the effects of small classes in
Grades K-3 (Molnar, Smith and Zahorik, 1999).
The positive impact of small classes on student achievement in SAGE classrooms
was consistent four years and confirmed the earlier findings of the STAR. The greatest
achievement gains were made in the first grade with second and third-grade students
maintaining the gains. Perhaps of greater significance, SAGE provided guidance for
policy makers and administrators about how best to implement small classes at the
district and local level through extensive non-experimental data collection (Molnar,
Smith and Zahorik, 1999).Even though the SAGE Programme reveals similar findings of
the STAR project, the contradiction raised by the Ehrenberg findings in 2001 requires
further research and clarification. Based on this argument the findings of this study will
provide clarifications that small number of students per teacher is significant in
improving performance.
California Massive Class Size Reduction
In California, a class size reduction programme began in 1996. Within a period of
several months, new teachers were hired and placed in Grade K-3 classrooms across the
state, reducing class sizes to 20 pupils or fewer. In three years of operation, this largest
class size reduction initiative resulted in 28,000 new teachers being deployed and
virtually every classroom in Grades 1-2 being reduced in sizes. Since the program was
implemented so quickly, very few large classes were available to serve as a comparison
group for evaluators. The evaluation focused on Grade 3, in which small but
statistically significant achievement gains were reported in reading, language and
mathematics. The benefits of small classes were in the range 0.05 to 0.10 standard
deviations (Bohrnstedt, Stecher & Wiley, 2000).
Although these were considered small effects, the results replicated those of the
STAR for pupils who entered small classes at Grade 3. In STAR, the largest effects were
obtained for students who entered small classes in earlier years (Bohrnstedt, Stecher &
Wiley, 2000).
California s experience provided important insight into the types of planning
needed before implementing a large-scale Class-Size Reduction Initiative, the current
study will further clarify whether such initiatives were worthwhile or not.
Project Prime Time Indiana
The Indiana legislature instituted Class-Size Reductions (CSR) in 1981 with its Project
Prime Time. According to Chase, Muller & Walden (1986), the state provided funds in
for school corporations to reduce first grade classes to an average of
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
students
48
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
or
with an instructional assistant. . The fall of 1985 saw second-grade added to
Prime time, and the final addition came in the fall of 1986 with Indiana School
Corporations given choice of adding third-grade. The result from Project Prime Time
demonstrated modest gains. The largest gains came in first grade reading with 50 % of
Indiana school reporting higher student achievement outcomes. Secondly with reduced
classrooms the Indiana school project revealed that teachers were more quickly able to
diagnose student s needs in small classes than large classes (Chase, Muller & Walden,
1986). The findings of this study will be important in revealing and supporting the
conclusions reached by the Indiana initiative concerning diagnosis of students needs in
small classes.
The Burke County Project in North Carolina
Studies of the effects of small classes in Burke County, North Carolina, reinforced SAGE
and STAR findings while addressing questions about financial and educational policy
implications of class size reductions. With the goal of improving education in relatively
poor Burke County, a pilot program in 1991-1992 reduced class to 18 in Grade 1 in four
schools, and in Grades 2 and 3 in subsequent years (Egelson & Harmon, 2000). Pilot
program results were highly positive. On the strength of these findings, the program
was extended in 1995-1996 to all elementary schools, Grades 1-3, providing the same
positive findings. By 2000, classes of about 17 were in all 17 schools with Grades 1-3. By
comparing the class size reductions with control classes, researchers reported higher
rates of time on task for students and more emphasis on student interaction. The
smaller classes significantly outperformed regular classes in Math and reading at the
end of Grades 1, 2 and 3. (Sharp, 2002).
The Burke county programme emphasized the importance of student interaction
and revealed that performance was higher when interaction was intensive. This study
therefore has the objective of comparing performance in schools with large enrolments
and those with low enrolments for the sake of making comparisons with the Burk
County programme.
Federal Initiatives Class-Size Reduction Programme
In its first-year report, the class-size Reduction programme
Boosting Student
Achievement in schools across the Nation , the U.S Department of Education
highlighted the expected benefit of class-size reduction (Hanushek, 1999). Federal classsize reduction funds were aimed at helping to make classrooms more manageable so
that teachers could focus on teaching and learning. The federal class-size reduction
program permitted schools to implement several models of small classes, including
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
49
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
some that were not small at all. The later included large classes (e.g., 32- 40 pupils) that
were team- taught by two full-time teacher, and pairs or triplets of larger classes (e.g. 30
pupils that shared a
rotating
teacher who would spend part of the day in each
classroom. Both of these models reduced the pupil-teacher ratio in classrooms. In its
first year of operation, approximately 29,000 teachers were hired under federal classsize reduction initiative. However, the ensuing calendar year saw a change in
administration in Washington. President Bush s education Plan, No child left Behind
targeted federal class size reduction money thus disregarding class size reduction. But
nevertheless it was noted from the initiative that small classes were becoming standard
practice in many states across U.S and were producing noticeable benefits to both
teachers and pupils (Hanushek, 1999).
Impact of Large Classrooms on Students Academic Achievement
Reducing class size has been found to have academic benefit in all subject areas. Studies
published since the mid-1980s showed that classroom behavior and test scores improve
while students are small in classes (Bain, Johnson & Word, 1989). The advantages of
small classes have been touted by educators throughout modern history. Only in recent
years, however, has there been a significant impetus for reducing class sizes in
American schools. This is due to the fact that teachers, parents, and policy makers
understand the importance of small classes for teaching and learning. This
understanding has made education to rise to the top of state and national agenda since
high quality research has demonstrated the academic and behavioral benefits of small
classes (Vander, 2003).
Within the literature on large classrooms in North America and Western Europe,
there is equivocation about the point at which classes become too large and negatively
impact education quality. In Western countries, class sizes of 30 are considered large
and in need of reduction. To complicate the issue further, there are examples of very
large classrooms with excellent student learning outcomes. South Korea, who placed
second on the 1996 Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), has an
average of 56.9 students per class in mathematics and 48.8 in science. Similar conditions
have been observed in both Japan and Singapore, where students are also excelling in
larger classes. Numerous analyses of classroom data many of which are documented
have been unsuccessful in making definitive statements about the effect of large
classrooms on learning outcomes. Some have argued that, intuitively smaller classes
have a positive impact on student achievement, while others conclude that there is no
significant impact (Vander, 2003). In Europe and North America contexts there is
agreement that small classes benefits occur due to a number of factors, including
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
50
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
increased teacher- pupil contact, differentiated instruction, improved classroom
management, and improved teacher morale (VanderArk, 2003). Researchers have also
noted that the academic gain seen in young children from smaller classes tends to
persist into higher grades. Where research on large classrooms in developing countries
does exist, it is just as inconclusive. Hanushek (1995) reviewed 96 studies that
attempted to link various educational inputs to student performance in developing
countries. Nearly a third of the reviewed studies (n=31) specifically investigated the
effect of pupil-teacher ratio. Of these, only eight studies found reductions in class size
significantly explain improved academic achievement. In another study, Hanushek
(1999) noted that smaller class size i.e low pupil-teacher ratio had a stronger positive
effect in secondary schools as compared to elementary schools. Of the 277 estimates
attempting to capture the effects of pupil-teacher ratio on student performance, only
15% of the estimates were significant and positive. Virtually the same percent, 13%
were negative and significant suggesting that lowering the pupil-teacher ratio resulted
in poorer student performance.
Table 2.1: Percentage Distribution of Estimated Influence of Pupil-Teacher Ratio on Student
Performance by level of Schooling
School level
Statistically
Statistically
significant
insignificant
Positive
Negative
%
%
Positive
Negative
Unknown
All schools
15
13
27
25
20
Elementary schools
13
20
25
20
23
Secondary schools
17
7
28
31
17
Source: Hanushek 1999
Note: A positive sign implies that low pupil-teacher ratio enhance student Performance.
From table 2.1, it appears that low pupil-teacher ratio (small class size) has stronger
positive effects in secondary schools as compared to elementary schools (17% to 13%
respectively).
These results are evidence against the widely held belief that smaller classes are
more effective during the early years of the education process. Most of the studies
carried out on small classes favored them on the basis of discipline and class
management. The arguments that small classes enhance performance received little
attention from earlier studies. Studies on teaching large classes noted that it was easy to
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
51
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
ignore the importance of human interaction when instructing large classes (Hanushek,
1999).
Table 2.2: Percentage Distribution of Effect of Class size on Student Performance, Based on
Value Added Models of Individual Student Performance
Universe of studies
All value added studies
Value added studies within a
Statistically
Statistically
significant
insignificant
Positive
Negative
%
%
Positive
Negative
Unknown
12
8
21
26
35
4
13
30
39
13
single state
Source: Hanushek (1999)
Note: A positive sign implies that smaller classes enhance student performance
In Table 2.2, Hanushek (1999) pointed out that, of the best available studies,
single-state, value-added studies of individual classroom achievement, only 1 of 23 or
4% result in positive and significant small class effects. In fact, more studies indicate a
negative and significant relation (13%), suggesting that small classes result in poorer
student performance. Hanushek (1995) noted that the most effective way to use time
efficiently in a large class was to prepare typed notes for pupils in advance. Large
classes took a toll on the teacher s ability to manage time, requiring more time to be
devoted to instructions i.e. how to complete an exercise rather than substantive
instruction. In lager classes, teachers were also found to devote less time to Math
instruction, reading and writing tasks. Other research indicates that small classes were
more likely to cover a range of subjects, such as social studies. Hanushek (1999)
indicated unfavorable results in terms of small class sizes increasing student
performance.
Hanushek summarizes:
(i)
The econometric evidence as a whole gives little support to the idea that smaller
classes will lead to general improvements in performance.
(ii)
The best studies that concentrate on differences in performance across individual
classrooms with varying numbers of students and that separate out other
possible influences on student performance offer no support whatsoever for
general gains in achievement through class size policies.
Michael lowa (2001) carried out studies in five Franco Sub-Saharan African
countries Cameroon, Cote d Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Madagascar and Senegal). From her
analysis, she concluded that there was an inverse relationship between class size and
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
52
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
learning outcome. She further noted that 62 students per teacher was a threshold
number. The study therefore found that academic achievement was increasingly high in
smaller class size (lower student-teacher ratio) in regular classes.
Class size has many effects on students engagement, behavior and retention.
Finn (2003) reviewed studies that examined the link between student engagement and
class size. He conceptualized student engagement into two forms: social engagement
and academic engagement. He concluded that when students are placed in smaller
classes they become more engaged, both academically and socially. With strong social
and academic engagement, he argued that academic achievement increased. Pupil
attention is an area of particular concern that affects academic engagement. Researchers
have shown that students tend to spend less time on class assignments when in large
classes. (Blatch, Ford & Mortimore, 1994, Cahen, 1989). It has also been shown that
students in smaller classes tend to participate more (Cahen, 1989). While there have
been few students systematic observations on the interaction, some have argued that:
Smaller classes allow teachers to engage their students in a differentiated fashion
in which teachers can cater their instruction in ways that engage individual
students.
With smaller numbers of students, teachers are able to pay closer attention to all
students, thereby holding them accountable for participations rather than
ignoring those that are passive (Blatch ford and Mortimore, 1994).
Impact of Large Classrooms after Implementation of FPE in Kenya
A study that was conducted after the introduction of Free Primary Education in Kenya
revealed that the country witnessed 10 % increase in enrolment in primary schools
nationally. A record of 1.3 million children registered in various schools across the
country, rising the enrolment from 5.9 million in 2002 to 7.2 million in 2003 (MOEST,
20004)
However, the sharp increase in enrolment rejuvenated the challenges of FPE in
the country (Wamukuru, Kamau & Ocholla, 2006), for instance, the number of pupils
exceeded the available human and physical facilities in the primary schools in the
country. The pupil-teacher ratio increased steadily from the recommended 40:1 to over
60:1 in 2008 (MOEST, 2009).
In their study on the effect of class-size on classroom interaction during
mathematics discourse in the wake of free primary education in Nakuru Municipality,
Majanga, et al (2010) revealed that the FPE policy created high pupil-teacher ratio,
congested classrooms, teacher shortage and huge teacher work-load. They noted that
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
53
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
these factors affected classroom interaction because teachers found it difficult to give
personalized attention to all the pupils.
In their study Majanga, et al (2010) noted that in schools where pupil-teacher
ratios are high, performance of pupils is very low compared to schools with low pupilteacher ratio. This was found to be true with learner s discipline. Schools with high
number of pupils per teacher were found to have discipline problems. They argued that
teachers did not have total control of the pupils population, and in many occasions,
many discipline cases were not noted for correction. This study also found that
privately managed schools achieved greater performance or academic value than the
publicly managed schools. They cited the reason behind this argument as less
bureaucracy, individualized attention to pupils due to small classes and closer to the
locus of information about school processes. The current study ought to find basis of
support to the findings reached on the differences of performance in schools with low
and those with high PTRs.
The results of the study showed that the number teachers remained the same
between 2000 and 2006. Some schools witnessed big drop in the number of teachers
between 2000 and 2001. The number of teachers remained constant until 2005.The study
also revealed that the pupil-teacher classroom interaction activities in the lower classes
were not exploited to the full because teachers relied on traditional lecture method of
teaching. Teachers in the lower classes did not involve all the pupils during classroom
interaction, for example teachers rushed over lessons interacting only with bright pupils
ignoring weaker and slow learners, avoided group work which promotes pupil-pupil
interaction.
The study also noted that due to over enrollment leading to high pupil-teacher
ratio this resulted to decline in general performance in most schools. It was also
revealed that minimal pupil-teacher interaction negatively influenced teaching and
learning of core subjects like mathematics which require frequent teacher interaction.
On average, the PTR for the sampled schools was 80:1 for lower classes and 50:1 for the
upper classes (Majanga et al. 2010).
A study by Boy (2006) noted that over enrolment caused poor performance in
public schools. This was evident from the comparison of the Kenya national
examination results for 2006 and 2007. Performance of primary school pupils in public
schools in K.C.PE declined compared to those in private primary schools (Too, 2005).
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
54
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Figure 2.1: Mean score of candidates in public and private primary schools in K.C.P.E 2006 in
Kenya
MEAN SCORES
420
410
400
MEAN SCORES
390
380
370
360
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
Source: KNEC Examinations 2006
The reality of teachers trying to teach over 100 pupils become too common in public
schools and raised concern about academic standards and therefore questioned the
effectiveness of public schools (Abagi & Olweya, 1999).
Sifuna (2003) noted that free primary education in public primary schools
stretched the teaching and learning facilities as a result of high influx of new pupils. In
the year 2007, the performance of pupils in public and private primary schools reflected
disparity with private institutions producing more candidates in the top 100 positions
nationally compared to public schools in some selected provinces in Kenya.
The study revealed that teachers complained of increased pupil-teacher ratios
and the increased workloads. The findings of the study also pointed out that many
primary schools became understaffed as a result of the FPE programme (Too, 2005).
In a study, UNESCO (2005) showed that the average ratio in 162 schools sampled
was 58:1 against the required 40:1. Such class sizes in public schools make it difficult for
the teachers to teach lessons effectively as compared to their counterparts in private
schools who handle a smaller number of pupils.
A study in Nyamaiya Division on performance determinants of K.C.S.E found
out that teacher adequacy and quality are among the key variables that predict
academic performance in mathematics (Odhiambo, 2006). He pointed out that there is a
shortage of mathematics teachers in Kenya but in urban schools, the problem is not as
pronounced. He further revealed that the student-teacher ratio in many secondary
schools in Kenya is 40:1 and proposed that for effective teaching of mathematics, it
should be 25:1 hence recommended the need to employ more mathematics teachers.
The study also revealed that high teaching workload led to ill preparation of teachers
and students hence lowering performance in national examinations.
In a study on school sizes in Nairobi area of Korogocho, Viwandani, Jericho and
Harambee on Quality of primary education children are receiving in urban schools
Ngware, et al (2008) noted that the teaching load in schools varied by school ownership
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
55
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
and location. They revealed that teachers in public schools had huge workload
compared to their counterparts in private schools.
From Table 2.5, on average in public schools, teachers teach for 32 lessons in a
week while those in private individual schools 17 lessons in a week. Teachers in public
schools not only teach large class sizes, but also teach more hours than their peers in
non-government schools.
Arnold (2000) revealed that large schools experience wider gaps in achievement.
He noted that because they result in less communication, interaction, and coordination
throughout the school this contributes to lower student achievement. While comparing
large schools and small schools, Arnold, Gaddy & Dean (2004) argued that in small
schools, the curriculum is limited and directed to average pupil rather than the full
range of pupils with varied learning needs.
The finding that small class-size matter however has been criticized in a number
of studies. In his submission, Hanushek (1999) in another study argued that small
classes do not yield better student outcomes. The SACMEQ in a paper presented to the
conference on Investment choices for Education in Africa in September 2006 raised
doubts on the relationship between class-size and student achievement. After apartheid,
another study was conducted in which the authors revealed that Pupil-teacher ratio had
a significant negative relationship with educational achievement for black students
while there were no similar findings for whites. In his submission, Garry (1996) pointed
out that small classes do not yield better student outcomes. However, scholars have
dismissed his submission arguing that his analysis relied more on typical education
production function studies using large and non-specific data set not established for
class size research (Greenwald, Hedges & Lain, 1996).
According to Benbow et al (2007), an ideal Pupil-teacher ratio should be 40:1. In a
study done in Ethiopia, Verwimp (1999) argued that there is a negative correlation
between the quality of teaching and the Pupil-teacher ratio. However, the Ethiopian
study was quick to acknowledge that class-size is not a relevant variable in the quality
debate. A study covering 11 of the 19 countries in the World Economic Indicators (WEI)
programmes reported a lower Pupil-teacher ratio for the participating countries. Most
WEI- countries (India, Philippines, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Peru, Argentina,
Brazil, Chile, Paraguay & Uruguay) had in average a Pupil-teacher ratio in the range of
20 to 30. India had the highest number (59) especially in the villages while Malaysia had
the lowest number, with a Pupil-teacher ratio of 18. In the WEI-Countries Zhang, et al
revealed that there was slight difference in students achievements across the
countries despite variations in Pupil-teacher ratio. The Pupil-teacher ratio in public
primary schools in Kenya was 43 in 2005 and 50 in 2007 (GOK, 2008). An indication that
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
56
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
either the number of teachers is declining or the number of pupils is growing at a much
faster rate than that of the teachers.
A study in Kenya by Duflo, Dupas & Kremer (2008) revealed that at the sample
mean, in lower grades, reducing class size from 80 to 40 without any change does not
lead to a significant increase in test scores. A similar finding was reported by Banerjee et
al (2007) in India where no impact of the reduction in class size was achieved through
the hiring of remedial education teachers for students who remained with a regular
teacher.
Sweeney (2004) asserted that in Mississippi the problem of teaching mathematics
needed adequate and qualified teachers and recommended to the Ministry of Education
to equip schools with enough teachers. Teacher shortage in South Africa was found to
be the stumbling block to performance of mathematics (Mji & Makgato, 2006). A study
on the effect of class size on classroom interaction after the implementation of FPE in
Kenya revealed that increased enrolments in schools created increased class sizes and
high Pupil-teacher ratio, factors that hindered Teacher-pupil interaction and negatively
affected performance in national examinations (Majanga, et al 2010).
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The study employed descriptive /non-experimental survey design. This is because the
researcher had no control over the independent variables i.e. PTR. According to
Creswell (1994), such a design intends to present facts about the nature and status of a
situation as it exists at the time of the study. Therefore, the design was helpful in order
to describe the current condition and situations based on data collected on PTR and
pupils performance. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered for the study,
this ensured that both statistical and non-statistical analysis was used in order to
support the findings of the results of the study.
Target Population
The target population from which the sample was drawn consisted of the 78 public
primary schools that are in the Division. The respondents of the study included, head
teachers of primary schools who represents the administrative authority in the schools
and act as secretaries of school management committees, the subject teachers who
deliver syllabus content to pupils, the County staffing officer who is in charge of the
staffing matters in the division, the District Examination Officer who handles
examination matters in the whole County where the Division is located, the County
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
57
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Quality Assurance and Standards Officer (QASO) who is in charge of implementation
of quality standards in schools in the Division.
Discussions of Research Findings
The study revealed that the FPE policy created high enrolments. After 2003 and the two
consecutive years, schools with pupils population of 600 pupils and less ceased while
schools with populations of 700 and 800 pupil increased abruptly in the year 2003. This
is a clear indication that since the year 2003 there has been an upward trend in school
enrolment in the primary schools. This factor resulted to large class sizes, high PTR,
congested classrooms, teacher shortage and huge teacher work-load. Most schools were
found to have teachers population of between
and
.
The statistical data drawn indicates that since the year 2002 the number of
teachers has been varying at very dismal rate, for instance in average this grew from 11
in 2002 to 15 in 2012 representing 36.6%. A comparison from the schools indicated that
pupils enrolment increased from year to year from
representing
. % increase.
This is evidence to support the view that pupils enrolments did not keep pace with
teacher increments.
Table 3.1: Summary of the Distributions of PTR and Performance (scores) 2002-2011)
Year
PTR
Mean scores
2002
46.6:1
229.4
2003
54.7:1
227.2
2004
53.3:1
224.4
2005
53.5:1
219.3
2006
50.2:1
222.4
2007
54.5:1
221.7
2008
51.3:1
221.9
2009
52.9:1
209.1
2010
51.9:1
217.3
2011
52.1:1
219.5
47.3
221.22
Total
Source: field data
The PTR which was the main focus of this study was analysed for the sampled schools.
This was in line with the objectives of the study. Based on evidence in Table 3.1 for the
PTR in the selected schools in 2002- 2012, there is evidence that after 2002, the PTR went
up to as high as 54.5:1 in 2007 up from 46.6:1 in 2002. This shows that either the
enrolment of pupils increased without due regard to the number of teachers or the
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
58
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
number of teachers declined. This scenario created an ugly picture on the PTR in the
primary schools where the findings found some schools have PTR as high as over 80
pupils per teacher. The study found that high PTR affected classroom interactions
because teachers found it difficult to give personalised attention to all pupils, give
adequate assignments, often mark pupils assignments and take full control of the
classes. This finding supports an earlier study conducted in Nyamaiya Division on
performance determinants of KCSE where Odhiambo (2006) found that teacher
adequacy was among the key factors of performance.
The results show that the number of teachers remained the same between the
year 2006 and 2009. The mean number of teachers remained the same for all sampled
schools between the year 2002 to 2003 and 2010 to 2012. The figures in the table show
that after 2002, the number of teachers did not commensurate with the increase in
enrolments.
Assessment of the impact of PTR on pupils performance was the key objective of
this study. The Table 3.1 indicated that since 2002 the average scores of pupils in the
sampled schools were below the average score of 250 marks. The table shows that in
average the schools recorded slight differences in performance in the consecutive years
since 2002.
This study revealed that teachers teach more lessons than recommended. In most
schools it was found that teachers for the lower primary teach 35 out of the 35 lessons
per week. This is a clear indication that such teachers are over loaded in their teaching
assignments. Table 3.2 shows that 70.8% of schools have teachers teaching 30-35 lessons
per week while the rest (29.2%) of schools having teachers handling over 35 lessons per
week.
Table 3.2: Teacher Teaching Load
Lessons per week
Less than 30
Between 30 and 35
Over 35
No. of schools
0
17
7
Percentage
0
70.8
29.2
Source: Field data
Most respondents agreed that teacher-pupil classroom interaction potentials in the
lower classes were not exploited to the full. Generally it was revealed that, teachers
rushed over lessons interacting only with bright pupils and ignoring weaker and slow
learners. These were some of the factors that were found to impact negatively on the
performance of pupils in the national exams. This finding supports the conclusions
drawn in the study conducted in schools in Nairobi slums by Ngware, Oketch and Ezeh
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
59
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
(2008), which revealed that teachers in public schools had huge workload which
affected effective pupil-teacher interaction.
Figure 3.1: PTR in the sampled schools
15
10
percentage
5
NO.OF SCHOOLS
0
Less
than
20:1
Between Between Between Between
20:1 and 30:1 and 40:1 and 50:1 and
60:1
50:1
40:1
30:1
over
60;1
The study revealed that the largest percentage (45.83%) of schools have PTR of between
50:1and 60:1, which is far above the set standards of 40:1. Most respondents of this
study agreed that attaining ideal PTR is one of the major challenges schools face and
which affects performance. This supported the findings of Hanushek (1999) which
concluded that low pupil-teacher ratio had a positive effect in secondary schools and
elementary schools. This study found out that lack of recruitment of teachers is the
major factor that obstructs schools from attaining the required set standard of 40:1.
Most schools were therefore found to have high teacher exit than entry.
In analysing the data related to PTR and its impact on academic performance, the
study revealed that PTR is a significant predictor of pupils performance. Analysis
revealed that there was -0.323 correlations (R) between PTR and test scores. This
negative index indicates that there is an inverse relationship between PTR and
performance.
Table 3.3: Pearson s Correlation Coefficient R
PTR
Pearson correlation
PTR
Scores
1
-0.323
-0.323
1
sig.(2-tailed)
SCORES
Pearson correlation
sig.(2-tailed)
The findings of this study concur with the conclusions drawn in earlier studies
conducted in various parts of the World on the impact of class-size and students
achievement. The Tennessee STAR experiment and the SAGE programme in Wisconsin
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
60
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
revealed an inverse relationship between student-teacher ratio and student academic
achievement. This earlier studies indicated that small class-size matters in determining
students achievement.
The study carried by Michael lowa (2001) concluded that there was an inverse
relationship between class size and learning outcome. He noted that academic
achievement was increasingly high in smaller class size in regular classes. This finding
coincides with the results of this study that low PTR has positive effect on pupils
performance.
Table 3.4: Coefficient of Determination R2
Model
1
R
.323
R
Adjusted
Std. Error of
Square
R Square
the Estimate
.104
-.008
5.63720
Change Statistics
R Square
F
df1
Change
Change
.104
.930
df2
Sig. F
Change
1
8
.363
From the Table 3.4 above the R statistic computed is -0.323, therefore R2 is equal to
0.104. This is the coefficient of determination and expresses the proportion of variance
in performance that is explained or accounted by PTR. From this data if R 2 = 0.104, this
means that 10.4% of variance in performance is accounted by PTR.
Therefore from this analysis it can be deduced that PTR only accounts for 10.4%
of the pupils performance while the remaining
. % is accounted for by other factors
or error in the independent variable. The respondents of the study indicated that other
than high PTR and acute teacher shortage, there are other intervening factors such as
lack of facilities and overloaded curriculum.
Table 3.5: Regression Model Coefficients
Model
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
for B
Beta
Lower
Upper
Bound
Bound
B
Std.
t
Sig.
Error
Constant
260.840
41.124
PTR
-.760
.789
-.323
95% Confidence Interval
6.343
.000
166.008
355.673
-.964
.363
-2.579
1.058
From the Table above, the regression model can be deduced in the form Y = 260.8 0.760(X). In this data therefore, the regression model for the study can be used to predict
performance of pupils (scores) in the schools when given the PTR. In this case :
Scores = 260.8 – 0.760(PTR)
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
61
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Therefore given the PTR in a school to be 35:1, the scores will be worked out as :Scores
= 260.8-0.760 ×35
=234.2
Again if PTR in a school is 55:1, then the performance of the pupils in terms of the
average scores becomes;
Scores = 260.8 – 0.760 × 55
= 219
It can be shown from the above worked examples that when the PTR is high,
performance in terms of average scores are low. The conclusion drawn from the above
is that the higher the PTR the lower the performance (scores). From this evidence it is
therefore vital for the policy makers to pay more attention on how to lower the PTR in
public schools. Based on this statistical evidence, the performance of pupils in
examinations can be predicted and this can be used as a baseline in findings solutions to
improving mean scores.
The findings and the analysis of the data related to PTR and performance reveals
that PTR is a determinant of pupils performance in primary schools. This finding
supports the study undertaken by Cahen (1989) who revealed that smaller classes allow
teachers to engage their students in a differentiated fashion in which teachers can cater
their instruction in ways that engage individual students. The statistical analysis can be
used to support the view that attaining ideal PTR could be one of the major steps in
improving performance of pupils in primary schools.
Figure 3.2: Scatter Plot of Test Scores vs. PTR
Performance (scores)
235
Scores = 260.8 – 0.760 (PTR)
230
225
220
Datenreihen1
215
Linear (Datenreihen1)
210
205
46
48
50
52
54
56
PTR
The slope of the regression line - 0.760 indicates that an increase in the PTR by one pupil
is bound to cause an increase in performance of pupils by 0.760. The regression line in
the scatter plot was also found to be downward sloping. This indicates that as PTR
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
62
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
increases performance decreases. Based on the regression model the performance of
schools can be predicted within certain margins of accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the findings from the analysis show that PTR is significant factor and can
be used to predict pupils performance in primary schools. Based on the relationships
between the two variables, the correlation coefficient using Pearson s product moment
indicates that there is -0.323 (negative) relationships between PTR and performance.
This correlation indicates that as PTR increases this affects performance of the
pupils negatively. The study therefore revealed that PTR affects performance of pupils
since it determines the magnitude of interaction between the teacher and the pupil. In
schools where the PTR is high above the set standards, teachers find it difficult to give
personalised attention to all pupils and take full control of their classes. Based on the
study findings and the statistical analysis there is strong evidence to show that PTR has
impact on the performance of pupils in schools. The result from the regression analysis
indicates that a reduction of one student caused an increase of 0.760 in scores. The
regression model can be used as a predictor of performance in any school given the
value of PTR in that school.
Conclusions
The study found out that PTR have statistically significant effect on pupil s performance
in primary schools. Results derived from the analysis indicates that there exists enough
evidence to conclude that the slope of the population regression line is not zero and that
PTR is a significant predictor of pupil s performance. This research study demonstrated
that a decline in PTR increases overall performance of pupils in public schools. The
analysis therefore partially supported by the findings regarding PTR and performance
indicate that there is a relationship between the two variables of the study. It is
therefore important that the number of pupils per teacher should be taken into
consideration by the government and other education sector stakeholders in
formulating policies in the schools. For better academic performance, great attention
should be placed on PTR. The impact of PTR also goes beyond its effects on
performance but also pupils discipline and teacher motivations. Much of the case for
low PTR rests on common sense arguments, but this research has now documented the
benefit of attaining ideal PTR. With low PTR, teachers can devote more attention to
pupil s needs.
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
63
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Recommendations for Policy and Practice
i.
There is need for government to employ more primary school teachers. This will
enable attainment of recommended PTR in schools which currently is far above the
required standards. It will also help to offset the problem of teacher shortage as a result
of over-enrolments caused by introduction of Free Primary Education.
ii.
There is need for the government through the MOE and the TSC to undertake
balancing of employed teachers throughout the country to ensure equity in teacher
distribution thus bring down PTR in those schools that it high and reduce teachers in
those schools that may be overstaffed.
iii.
There is need for government-private partnership in employment of teachers.
This will lessen the government burden of meeting huge non-development
expenditures on salaries.
References
1. Abagi, O., Olweya, J. (1999) Achieving Primary Education Universal 2015 Where
the reality lies: Challenges & Future Strategies, Nairobi, IPAR
2. Anami L. (2010) East Africa promises bigger markets for job seekers. The
Standard online. Retrieved Feb. 1 2010 from http://www.standardmedia
3. Arnold, M. L (2000) Rural Schools: Diverse needs call for flexible policies,
Aurora: Mid-continent Research for Education and learning
4. Arnold. L, Gaddy, B. & Dean, C.B. (2004) A look at the condition of rural
education research: Setting a direction for future research. Aurora: MidContinent Research for Education and Learning.
5. Alderman, H. Orazem, P. & Paterno, E. (2001) School Quality, School cost and
the public/private school choices of low-income Households in Pakistan, Journal
of Human Resources, 36, pp 304-306.
6. Bain, Johnson & Word (1989) Student-Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR):
Tennessee s K-3 Class size Study. Nashville, TN: Tennessee State Department of
Education
7. Banerjee, A., Cole, S. Duflo, E. & Linden, L.
. Remedying Education
Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India , Quarterly journal of
Economics
8. Benbow J, Oliver, D & Said, M (2007) Large Class Size in Developing Countries:
What Do We know And what can We Do? Educational Quality Improvement
Program, Communities, Schools & USAID. American Institute For Research
9. Blatchford, P & Mortimore, P (1994) The issue of class-size in schools, what we
can learn from research? Oxford: Oxford Review of Education.
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
64
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
10. Bohrnstedt, Stecher & Willey (2000) Teaching for quality learning in schools
Buckingham, Open University Press
11. Brewer et al., (2001).The class size controversy (CHERI working paper) No.14
Cornel University, ILR School.
12. Bruce, J. & Beverly, S. (1988) Student Achievement through staff development.
Longman: New York
13. Boy, J. (2006) Free primary Education and its Effects on student performance in
Bungoma District: Research Thesis, Moi University
14. Case, A. & Deaton, A. (1999). School inputs and educational outcomes in South
Africa.Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3):1047-1084
15. Cahen, L. S. (1989) Class size & Instruction, New York: Longman
16. Chase, C. L. Muller, D.J. and Walden, J.D.
. Effects of Reduced Class Sizes
in Primary Classes, Educational Leadership , no. pp -50
17. Cooper, H.M. (1989). Does Reducing Student-to-Teacher Ratio Affect
Achievement? Educational Psychologist 24(1), 79-98.
18. Cresswel, L. (1994) Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed method
and Approaches, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
19. Crouch, L. & Mabogoane, T. (1998) When the residuals matter more than the
coefficients: An educational perspective. Studies in Economics and Econometrics
22(2):1-4
20. Daily Nation
Teachers strike brings into focus Kenya s poor quality of
education. Daily Nation Newspaper 9th Sept. 2011, Nairobi, Nation Media
Group.
21. Duflo, E. Dupas, P. & Kremer, M. (2008).Peer Effects, Class Size, and Teacher
Incentives: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya. Retrieved from
http://siteresources.Worldbank.org/EXTBNPP/Resources/TF056474KenyaEtp0616
07.pdf
22. Egelson & Harmon (2000).The effect of School Quality on student performance:
A Quantile Regression, Approach, Economics Letters 58, pp.45
23. Ehrenberg, R.G.
. Class size and Student Achievement Psychological
science in
the Public interest Journal no.1. 2001
24. Finn, J.
. The “ WHYs of class size Student Behavior in Small Classes
Review of Educational Buffalo, State University of New York
25. Fleshman, F. (2005 Giant step for Kenya s schools Africa Renewal
,
Retrieved
from
http://www.Un.org/ecosocdev/geninfor/afrec/Vol.19no.2/192pg 10.htm
26. Garry. (1996) The effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult
Success, Washington D.C: Brookings Institution
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
65
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
27. Gerald, G & Lawn .M (1991) Teacher supply & Teacher Quality issues for the
Great Britain
s Short run press Exeter.
28. Glass V. & Smith, L. (1978) Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship of
Class Size and Achievement, San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for
Educational Research and Development.
29. Glewwe, P. and Ilias, N.
. The Determinants of School Africa: A Case
Study of Ghana Attainment in Sub-Saharan , Journal of International
Development ,8 pp 395-413
30. GOK (2005).A policy Framework for Education, Training & Research, Meeting
the
challenges of Education, Training and Research paper No.10, MOEST,
Nairobi.
31. GOK (2008) .Education Sector Report 2008: Realizing vision 2030 goals through
effective and efficient spending. Nairobi: Ministry of Education.
32. Graddy, K .& Stevens, M.
The impact of school inputs on students
performance: An empirical study of private schools in the United Kingdom,
Discussion paper series, Oxford: Oxford university press
33. Greenwald, R. Hedges, L. & Lain, D. R.
The effect of school resources on
student achievement Review of Educational Research
no. pp
-396
34. Hanushek, E.A (1995) Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing
countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2) pg27-246.
35. Hanushek, E.K.
. Some findings from an Independent Investigation of the
Tennessee STAR Experiment and from other Investigation of size effects ,
Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis,21(2):143-163
36. Klein, F. (1985), The master teacher as a curriculum leader, Elementary school
Journal, 86(1) pp35-43.
37. Kerlinger, F.N.(1986) Foundations of behavioral Research New York: Holt,
Reinhart & Winston
38. Kippra (2007) Impact of primary Education inputs and outputs in Kenya; An
empirical Evidence. Nairobi: Kippra.
39. King, L & Schielman, S
Cambodia Highland children s Education Project
HCEP , Care International in Cambodia Challenge of Indigenous Education:
Practice and Perspectives, UNESCO,2004, PP113-122
40. Kwabena, N.B (1991) Teacher Motivation and Retention in Ghana. Accra Ghana
University press.
41. Levacic, R. (2005), Estimating the relationship between school Resources and
pupil Attainment at Key stage Report to Dfes January 2005, University of
London, Institute of Education, London.
42. Majanga, E.K, Nasongo, J.W & Sylvia, V.K (2010) The Effect of Class Size
Interaction During Mathematics Discourse in the Wake of Free Primary
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
66
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
Education: A Study of Public Primary Schools in Nakuru Municipality, Current
Research Journal of Social Sciences 3(1) pp 44-49
43. Mbithi, D.M (1974) Foundations of School Administration. Nairobi: Oxford
University press.
44. Michaelowa, K.(2001) Primary Education Quality in Francophone Sub-Saharan
Africa; Determinants of learning achievement and efficiency considerations,
World Development 29, 1699-1716
45. Mji, A. & Makgato.
Factors that associate with high school learners poor
performance. Spotlight on Mathematics and Physical Sciences South Africa.
Journal of Education Vol. 26.
46. Moe (2009); Education Facts & Figures 2002-2008; Education Management
Information Systems (EMIS), Nairobi
47. MOEST (2003) Free Primary Education: Every Child in School, Government
Printer, Nairobi
48. MOEST (2004) Primary School Instructional Materials Management Handbook,
Nairobi: Government printer.
49. Molnar, Smith & Zahorik
Evaluating the SAGE programme A pilot
programme in Targeted Pupil-Teacher Reduction in Winconsin Education &
Policy Analysis summer, pp165-177
50. Mosteller, F. (1995) The Tennessee Study of Class Size in early Grades, The
Future of Children 5(2) pp.113-127
51. Mugenda, O.M. &Mugenda, A.G. (1999). Research methods; Quantitative &
Qualitative Approaches, Nairobi Acts press.
52. Mutea, R. (2009) Education at crossroads. Meru: Eureka publishers.
53. Ngware, M., Oketch. &Ezeh, A (2008) What Quality of Primary Education are
Children in Urban Schools Receiving?, Nairobi: APHRC Working paper
No.39,2008
54. Odhiambo, J. (2006) Performance determinants of KCSE in Mathematics in
Secondary Schools, Canadian centre of science & Education, Canada.
55. Olembo, J.O. Wanga, P.E. &Karagu, N.M (1992) Management in Education
Nairobi: Educational Research & Publications (ERP).
56. Paul, O. (2004) Writing Your Thesis. 55 City Road London Eclyisp. SAGE
Publications Ltd.
57. Ron, W.
“The Highlands Children s Education Project, Cambodia and
Remote Area Teacher Education Programme , Research congress on Cambodia
Rupp 2004, pp18-20
58. Sifuna, D.N. (2003) Free primary Education: Every child in school, Nairobi:
MOEST
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
67
Kaloki Joseph Waita, Kasau Onesmus Mulei, Kitoo Beth Mueni, Mutinda Julius Mutune, Jeremiah Kalai
PUPIL-TEACHER RATIO AND ITS IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC PRIMARY
SCHOOLS IN CENTRAL DIVISION, MACHAKOS COUNTY, KENYA
59. Sifuna, D.N. & Sawamura, N. (2008) Universalizing primary Education in Kenya;
Is it beneficial and suitable? Journal of International Cooperation in Education.
60. Sweeney, J.D. (1989). A study of some factors related to mathematical
achievement in Mississippi High schools as measured on the American College
test. Published PhD Thesis University of Mississippi, USA.
61. Too, J.K (2005) Quality of free primary Education in Kenya ;The Educator, school
of Education, Eldoret: Moi University press
62. TSC (2006).Policy on teacher recruitment and selection, Nairobi: Teachers Service
Commission
63. UNESCO, (2000); The Dakar Framework For Action, Paris,UNESCO
64. UNESCO, (2005) Education for All (EFA) .Global Monitoring Report, UNESCO
65. UNESCO, (2006) Teacher training, qualifications and educational quality.
http://www.uis.unesco.org/TEMPLATE/pdf/Teachers
Retrieved
from
2006/TeachersCh2.pdf
66. UNICEF. (2005) Regional disparities threaten progree towards education for all.
Retrieved from http://www.unice.org/infobycountry/Kenya/newsline.html
67. Odhiambo, J.W. (2006).Teaching of Statistics in Kenya. Nairobi: Nairobi
University press
68. Orodho, A.J. (2008) Techniques of writing Research Proposals & Reports in
Education and Social sciences. Maseno: Kanezja HP enterprises.
69. Orodho, A.J. (2009) Elements of Education and social science Research Methods.
Maseno; Kanezja publishers.
70. Vander T. (2003) The case of small High school; Educational Leadership, Oxform
71. Verwimp, P.
Measuring the quality of education at two levels A case
study of primary schools in rural Ethiopia International Review of Education,
45(2):6-19
72. Wamukuru et al. (2006) Challenges Facing the Implementation of Free Primary
Education: A teachers perspective.Afr.Qual.Edu.3 pp 1-15
73. Zhang, Y., Postlethwaite, T.N. & Grisay, A. (2008). A view Inside Primary
Schools: A world Education Indicators (WEI) cross-national study. Montreal:
UNESCO Institute of Statistics
Views and opinions expressed in this research article are the views and opinions of the author(s), Open
Access Publishing Group and European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science shall not be
responsible or answerable for any loss, damage or liability etc. caused in relation to/arising out of the use
and provenience of the content. The author(s) retain(s) the copyrights of the published research article
and consent(s) on being fully responsible for any conflict of interests regarding copyright violations,
provenience and improper or inaccurate use of third part content. This research article is meeting the
Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used
in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (CC BY 4.0).
European Journal of Education Studies – Special Issue
68