Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu Volume 3 │ Issue 12 │ 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1125651 DETERMINATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS' OPINIONS ABOUT OUTDOOR EDUCATION Ulas Kubati Mugla Sitki Koçman University, Faculty of Education, Turkey Abstract: The aim of this research is to discover what science teachers' opinions about outdoor education learning environments are. Outdoor education learning environments contribute to problem-solving, critical and creative thinking skills of students. For this reason, outdoor education learning environments are very important for students to learn by recognizing the nature and the natural environment. Qualitative research method was used in this research. The study group of the research constitutes 16 science teachers. A semi-structured interview form was used as a data collection tool. According to the results of the research, most science teachers stated that they have taken their students to science centers and museums as the outdoor education environment in order for the students to be aware of the nature and the natural environment. They desired to use the outdoor learning environments, but the conditions of them are not appropriate. Teachers stated that they had problems in school-family cooperation, in-service training and obtaining legal permission. Keywords: science, science teachers, outdoor education, opinions 1. Introduction The fact that the students are imprisoned in the classroom in the course of educational experiences and the fact that the real life is removed, is a critical condition (Özür, 2010). According to Dewey, "... there must be stalls, laboratories, fields, stables. The goal is not to teach children an art and a profession but to provide them with learning by doing" (Akyüz, 1979, Quoted in: Özür, 2010). Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 344 Ulas Kubat DETERMINATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS' OPINIONS ABOUT OUTDOOR EDUCATION Outdoor education learning environments such as science centers for science teaching, museums, zoos, botanical gardens, and planetarium are being used more and more for science teachers (Smith, McLaughlin and Tunnicliffe, 1998). Learning environment in science teaching in general consists of classroom, laboratory, and outdoor education spaces (Orion and Hofstein, 1994). Classroom and laboratory environments are a limited learning environment for science courses, and science offers many opportunities for students in outdoor education (Carrier, 2009). Classrooms are not enough to create enriched learning environments. Especially lessons those are related with everyday life such as science education must be held outside the classrooms. In this context, teachers should take outdoor education activities; it will help students to love science and provide them with an entertaining and instructive way to internalize abstract concepts. Gaining awareness in science education, enhancing students' science knowledge, and providing rich science environments are among the primary tasks of the science teacher. Outdoor education activities to achieve them have great importance in terms of students' discovering nature, acquiring social experience and gaining concrete experiences (Griffin, 2004; Tal, Bamberger and Morag, 2005). Nowadays, it is emphasized the importance of that the student faces with the problem directly such that the student must have experiences in real life. Briefly, the best learning can be achieved in real life. In this context, putting the students outside the classroom will help them learn new scientific concepts and skills and learn more. Learning new things in different ways can be funny, and this can make learning more interesting and meaningful. Using resources that are not available at school can be exciting for students. Encountering new environments can enhance social skills, selfesteem, the positive development of science attitudes, and learning motivations (Loxley, Dawes, Nicholls, Dore, 2016). Outdoor education learning environments allow children to develop positive attitudes towards science through fun experiences. Outdoor education learning environments include science centers, museums, zoos, botanical gardens, planetarium, industrial establishments, aquariums and national parks. Such learning environments allow learners to be exposed to scientific experiences through cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor interactions, and increase their motivation to learn (Andiema, 2016). As a result of the survey, the planetarium tour showed that the planetarium tour was suitable for science learning and that the information became more permanent and that such outdoor education learning environments were fun and effective (Sontay, Tutar, Karamustafaoğlu 6). Science museums contribute to children's scientific literacy and inquiry skills (Henriksen & Froyland, 2000). The planetarium, another outdoor learning environment, contributes to children's basic astronomical knowledge and helps develop three-dimensional thinking skills (Fisher, 1997) European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 12 │ 2017 345 Ulas Kubat DETERMINATION OF SCIENCE TEACHERS' OPINIONS ABOUT OUTDOOR EDUCATION The basic aim of the outdoor education learning is an effective and permanent learning. For this reason, such activities can also be used to further strengthen learning activities in school. Students discover objects, materials and events in an outdoor education learning environment by making direct observations in-field. In addition, such learning environments help on developing the problem-solving skills, having positive attitudes towards science, and motivating. The observation of students in an outdoor education environment makes them to construct a cause-effect relationship in the events, improves their examining skills. In short, outdoor learning environments support the development of students in all three areas, cognitive, emotional and psychomotor. The aim of this research is to discover what science teachers' opinions about outdoor learning environments are. To this end, the following questions were asked to science teachers: 1. Where and why do you take your students as outdoor education learning environments? 2. How are your conditions for taking students to outdoor education settings? 3. What do you think about the negative aspects of the outdoor education learning environment? For viewing / downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1309 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 12 │ 2017 346