Academia.eduAcademia.edu
European Journal of Education Studies ISSN: 2501 - 1111 ISSN-L: 2501 - 1111 Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/edu doi: 10.5281/zenodo.887944 Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 EXAMINATION OF THE SKILL AREAS OF GIFTED CHILDREN USING WISC-R INTELLIGENCE SCALE SCORES Ahmet Bildireni Dr., Assistant Professor, Adnan Menderes University, Special Education Department Abstract: In this study, it was examined whether the WISC-R test scores of gifted children differ according to their area of special ability or not. The sample group of the study was selected from 5 different cities and was comprised of a total of 237 gifted children with 48,9 % girls (n=116) and 51,1 % boys (n=121). The class level of the children varies between 4th and 11th grades. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze whether there are statistically significant differences between the ability areas of gifted children or not according to their WISC-R intelligence scale scores. In case of a difference, post-hoc tests were carried out for determining the groups with the difference. The accepted level of significance was 0,05. Study results put forth that the intelligence scores of gifted children varied according to their individual ability areas of performance. Keywords: gifted children, WISC-R, area of ability 1. Introduction Many approaches have been put forth until today regarding the skill areas (Binet & Simon, 1905; Gagne, 2003; Gardner, 2003; Sternberg, 2003; Renzullli, 1984; Stenberg & Zhang, 1998; Tannenbaum, 2003; Taylor, 1973; Terman, 1926). Even though opinions differ, majority has agreed that the potential may be diagnosed in some children and that the skill may be examined in different categories when this potential develops towards certain characteristics. Various theorists have focused on the genetic components of the gift and intelligence, whereas others have separated gift from talent Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. © 2015 – 2017 Open Access Publishing Group 378 Ahmet Bildiren EXAMINATION OF THE SKILL AREAS OF GIFTED CHILDREN USING WISC-R INTELLIGENCE SCALE SCORES using factors of potential, luck and environment. Another group emphasized multiple intelligence. The definition and concepts of gift from the first years have been seen to be equivalent with high IQ levels. Psychometry experts such as Alfred Binet and Lewis Terman and psychologists were the first to emphasize that intelligence has genetic components. Binet (1905) and Terman (1926) developed a general test of intelligence applied for diagnosing gifted children. Intelligence tests were revised following these years and used frequently for diagnosing gifts. The opinions of these theorists regarding superiority are generally intelligence test focused. However, some theorists have argued recently that intelligence cannot be expressed in a single way and that superiority should include multi-dimensional concepts (Gagne, 2003; Gardner, 2003; Renzulli, 1984; Sternberg, 2003; Stenberg and Zhang, 1998, Tannenbaum, 2003; Taylor, 1973). Renzulli developed the Three Ring Model in the field of superior ability and put forth this model with an educational perspective (Renzulli, 2005). In this model, factors of personality and environment interact with three property sets: Above average ability, Task commitment and Creativity. Especially Above average ability makes up 15-20% of the performance or performance potential. Task Commitment is a form of motivation. Whereas creativity emphasizes the creative successes of the individual. In this model, Renzulli (2005) has emphasized that a single ring or a set do not mean anything by themselves and that all three should be together for superiority. Whereas Abraham Tannenbaum focused the definition of superiority on children with potential to display performances and create ideas in areas encompassing the moral, physical, social, emotional or aesthetic lives of people (Tannenbaum, 2003, p. 45). Tannenbaum 00 suggests the Star Model for diagnosing children. The Star Model is comprised of five interactive factors with contribution to the superior behavior: a) superior general intellect, b) distinctive special aptitude, c) non-intellective traits, d) a challenging and facilitative environment, e) luck. These five factors interact in different ways to form different categories; however all should be present for giftedness. When these factors are combined, it means that the child has a potential to be a gifted adult in the future. For downloading the full article, please access the following link: https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/1024 European Journal of Education Studies - Volume 3 │ Issue 9 │ 2017 379